Literature DB >> 21969994

Dynamic regime marginal structural mean models for estimation of optimal dynamic treatment regimes, Part I: main content.

Liliana Orellana1, Andrea Rotnitzky, James M Robins.   

Abstract

Dynamic treatment regimes are set rules for sequential decision making based on patient covariate history. Observational studies are well suited for the investigation of the effects of dynamic treatment regimes because of the variability in treatment decisions found in them. This variability exists because different physicians make different decisions in the face of similar patient histories. In this article we describe an approach to estimate the optimal dynamic treatment regime among a set of enforceable regimes. This set is comprised by regimes defined by simple rules based on a subset of past information. The regimes in the set are indexed by a Euclidean vector. The optimal regime is the one that maximizes the expected counterfactual utility over all regimes in the set. We discuss assumptions under which it is possible to identify the optimal regime from observational longitudinal data. Murphy et al. (2001) developed efficient augmented inverse probability weighted estimators of the expected utility of one fixed regime. Our methods are based on an extension of the marginal structural mean model of Robins (1998, 1999) which incorporate the estimation ideas of Murphy et al. (2001). Our models, which we call dynamic regime marginal structural mean models, are specially suitable for estimating the optimal treatment regime in a moderately small class of enforceable regimes of interest. We consider both parametric and semiparametric dynamic regime marginal structural models. We discuss locally efficient, double-robust estimation of the model parameters and of the index of the optimal treatment regime in the set. In a companion paper in this issue of the journal we provide proofs of the main results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21969994

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Biostat        ISSN: 1557-4679            Impact factor:   0.968


  75 in total

1.  When to start treatment? A systematic approach to the comparison of dynamic regimes using observational data.

Authors:  Lauren E Cain; James M Robins; Emilie Lanoy; Roger Logan; Dominique Costagliola; Miguel A Hernán
Journal:  Int J Biostat       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 0.968

2.  Dynamic regime marginal structural mean models for estimation of optimal dynamic treatment regimes, Part II: proofs of results.

Authors:  Liliana Orellana; Andrea Rotnitzky; James M Robins
Journal:  Int J Biostat       Date:  2010-03-03       Impact factor: 0.968

3.  Identifying a set that contains the best dynamic treatment regimes.

Authors:  Ashkan Ertefaie; Tianshuang Wu; Kevin G Lynch; Inbal Nahum-Shani
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2015-08-03       Impact factor: 5.899

4.  Set-valued dynamic treatment regimes for competing outcomes.

Authors:  Eric B Laber; Daniel J Lizotte; Bradley Ferguson
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Identifying optimal biomarker combinations for treatment selection via a robust kernel method.

Authors:  Ying Huang; Youyi Fong
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2014-08-14       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Introduction to SMART designs for the development of adaptive interventions: with application to weight loss research.

Authors:  Daniel Almirall; Inbal Nahum-Shani; Nancy E Sherwood; Susan A Murphy
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 3.046

7.  Robustifying Trial-Derived Optimal Treatment Rules for A Target Population.

Authors:  Ying-Qi Zhao; Donglin Zeng; Catherine M Tangen; Michael L LeBlanc
Journal:  Electron J Stat       Date:  2019-04-30       Impact factor: 1.125

8.  Longitudinal Effects of Adaptive Interventions With a Speech-Generating Device in Minimally Verbal Children With ASD.

Authors:  Daniel Almirall; Charlotte DiStefano; Ya-Chih Chang; Stephanie Shire; Ann Kaiser; Xi Lu; Inbal Nahum-Shani; Rebecca Landa; Pamela Mathy; Connie Kasari
Journal:  J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol       Date:  2016-03-08

9.  Dynamic models for estimating the effect of HAART on CD4 in observational studies: Application to the Aquitaine Cohort and the Swiss HIV Cohort Study.

Authors:  Mélanie Prague; Daniel Commenges; Jon Michael Gran; Bruno Ledergerber; Jim Young; Hansjakob Furrer; Rodolphe Thiébaut
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2016-07-26       Impact factor: 2.571

10.  Inverse probability weighted estimation of risk under representative interventions in observational studies.

Authors:  Jessica G Young; Roger W Logan; James M Robins; Miguel A Hernán
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2018-08-10       Impact factor: 5.033

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.