Literature DB >> 25483970

The impact of acid mine drainage on the methylmercury cycling at the sediment-water interface in Aha Reservoir, Guizhou, China.

Tianrong He1, Yuzhen Zhu, Deliang Yin, Guangjun Luo, Yanlin An, HaiYu Yan, Xiaoli Qian.   

Abstract

The methylmercury (MeHg) cycling at water-sediment interface in an acid mine drainage (AMD)-polluted reservoir (Aha Reservoir) and a reference site (Hongfeng Reservoir) were investigated and compared. Both reservoirs are seasonal anoxic and alkaline. The concentrations of sulfate, sulfide, iron, and manganese in Aha Reservoir were enriched compared to the reference levels in Hongfeng reservoir due to the AMD input. It was found that the MeHg accumulation layer in Aha Reservoir transitioned from the top sediment layer in winter to the water-sediment interface in spring and then to the overlying water above sediment in summer. It supported the assumption that spring methylation activity may start in sediments and migrate into the water column with seasonal variation. The weaker methylation in sediment during spring and summer was caused by the excessive sulfide (∼15-20 μM) that reduced the bioavailability of mercury, while sulfate reduction potential was in the optimal range for the methylation in the overlying water. This led to a transport flux of MeHg from water to sediment in spring and summer. In contrast, such inversion of MeHg accumulation layer did not occur in Hongfeng Reservoir. The sulfate reduction potential was in the optimal range for the methylation in top sediment, and dissolved MeHg was positively related to sulfide in pore water of Hongfeng Reservoir (r = 0.67, p < 0.001). This result suggested that accumulation of MeHg in lake water and cycling of MeHg at sediment-water interface associate with some sensitive environmental factors, such as sulfur.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25483970     DOI: 10.1007/s11356-014-3864-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int        ISSN: 0944-1344            Impact factor:   4.223


  16 in total

1.  The influence of sulfide on solid-phase mercury bioavailability for methylation by pure cultures of Desulfobulbus propionicus (1pr3).

Authors:  J M Benoit; C C Gilmour; R P Mason
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2001-01-01       Impact factor: 9.028

2.  Mercury methylation by novel microorganisms from new environments.

Authors:  Cynthia C Gilmour; Mircea Podar; Allyson L Bullock; Andrew M Graham; Steven D Brown; Anil C Somenahally; Alex Johs; Richard A Hurt; Kathryn L Bailey; Dwayne A Elias
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2013-09-26       Impact factor: 9.028

3.  Mercury methylation from unexpected sources: molybdate-inhibited freshwater sediments and an iron-reducing bacterium.

Authors:  Emily J Fleming; E Erin Mack; Peter G Green; Douglas C Nelson
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 4.  Recovery of mercury-contaminated fisheries.

Authors:  John Munthe; R A Drew Bodaly; Brian A Branfireun; Charles T Driscoll; Cynthia C Gilmour; Reed Harris; Milena Horvat; Marc Lucotte; Olaf Malm
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 5.129

5.  The impact of eutrophication on the biogeochemical cycling of mercury species in a reservoir: a case study from Hongfeng Reservoir, Guizhou, China.

Authors:  Tianrong He; Xinbin Feng; Yanna Guo; Guangle Qiu; Zhonggen Li; Lian Liang; Julia Lu
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2007-12-26       Impact factor: 8.071

6.  Effects of sulfate reducing bacteria and sulfate concentrations on mercury methylation in freshwater sediments.

Authors:  Dingding Shao; Yuan Kang; Shengchun Wu; Ming H Wong
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2012-03-22       Impact factor: 7.963

7.  Decrease in net mercury methylation rates following iron amendment to anoxic wetland sediment slurries.

Authors:  Anna S Mehrotra; David L Sedlak
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2005-04-15       Impact factor: 9.028

8.  Biogeochemical factors influencing net mercury methylation in contaminated freshwater sediments from the St. Lawrence River in Cornwall, Ontario, Canada.

Authors:  Mary-Luyza Avramescu; Emmanuel Yumvihoze; Holger Hintelmann; Jeff Ridal; Danielle Fortin; David R S Lean
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2010-12-21       Impact factor: 7.963

9.  Geochemical controls on the production and distribution of methylmercury in near-shore marine sediments.

Authors:  Chad R Hammerschmidt; William F Fitzgerald
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2004-03-01       Impact factor: 9.028

Review 10.  Mercury and monomethylmercury: present and future concerns.

Authors:  W F Fitzgerald; T W Clarkson
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  1 in total

1.  Optimization of pretreatment procedure for MeHg determination in sediments and its applications.

Authors:  Xiaonan Ji; Chengbin Liu; Jianbo Shi; Gang Pan
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2019-04-27       Impact factor: 4.223

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.