Literature DB >> 21176945

Biogeochemical factors influencing net mercury methylation in contaminated freshwater sediments from the St. Lawrence River in Cornwall, Ontario, Canada.

Mary-Luyza Avramescu1, Emmanuel Yumvihoze, Holger Hintelmann, Jeff Ridal, Danielle Fortin, David R S Lean.   

Abstract

The activity of various anaerobic microbes, including sulfate reducers (SRB), iron reducers (FeRP) and methanogens (MPA) has been linked to mercury methylation in aquatic systems, although the relative importance of each microbial group in the overall process is poorly understood in natural sediments. The present study focused on the biogeochemical factors (i.e. the relative importance of various groups of anaerobic microbes (FeRP, SRB, and MPA) that affect net monomethylmercury (MMHg) formation in contaminated sediments of the St. Lawrence River (SRL) near Cornwall (Zone 1), Ontario, Canada. Methylation and demethylation potentials were measured separately by using isotope-enriched mercury species ((200)Hg(2+) and MM(199)Hg(+)) in sediment microcosms treated with specific microbial inhibitors. Sediments were sampled and incubated in the dark at room temperature in an anaerobic chamber for 96h. The potential methylation rate constants (K(m)) and demethylation rates (K(d)) were found to differ significantly between microcosms. The MPA-inhibited microcosm had the highest potential methylation rate constant (0.016d(-1)), whereas the two SRB-inhibited microcosms had comparable potential methylation rate constants (0.003d(-1) and 0.002d(-1), respectively). The inhibition of methanogens stimulated net methylation by inhibiting demethylationand by stimulating methylation along with SRB activity. The inhibition of both methanogens and SRB was found to enhance the iron reduction rates but did not completely stop MMHg production. The strong positive correlation between K(m) and Sulfate Reduction Rates (SRR) and between K(d) and Methane Production Rates (MPR) supports the involvement of SRB in Hg methylation and MPA in MMHg demethylation in the sediments. In contrast, the strong negative correlation between K(d) and Iron Reduction Rates (FeRR) shows that the increase in FeRR corresponds to a decrease in demethylation, indicating that iron reduction may influence net methylation in the SLR sediments by decreasing demethylation rather than favouring methylation. Copyright Â
© 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21176945     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.11.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  12 in total

1.  The impact of acid mine drainage on the methylmercury cycling at the sediment-water interface in Aha Reservoir, Guizhou, China.

Authors:  Tianrong He; Yuzhen Zhu; Deliang Yin; Guangjun Luo; Yanlin An; HaiYu Yan; Xiaoli Qian
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2014-12-09       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 2.  In situ remediation technologies for mercury-contaminated soil.

Authors:  Feng He; Jie Gao; Eric Pierce; P J Strong; Hailong Wang; Liyuan Liang
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-04-09       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Ruditapes philippinarum and Ruditapes decussatus under Hg environmental contamination.

Authors:  Cátia Velez; Petrus Galvão; Renan Longo; Olaf Malm; Amadeu M V M Soares; Etelvina Figueira; Rosa Freitas
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-04-14       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Genome-Resolved Metagenomics and Detailed Geochemical Speciation Analyses Yield New Insights into Microbial Mercury Cycling in Geothermal Springs.

Authors:  Caitlin M Gionfriddo; Matthew B Stott; Jean F Power; Jacob M Ogorek; David P Krabbenhoft; Ryan Wick; Kathryn Holt; Lin-Xing Chen; Brian C Thomas; Jillian F Banfield; John W Moreau
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2020-07-20       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Effect of Elodea nuttallii roots on bacterial communities and MMHg proportion in a Hg polluted sediment.

Authors:  Nicole Regier; Beat Frey; Brandon Converse; Eric Roden; Alexander Grosse-Honebrink; Andrea Garcia Bravo; Claudia Cosio
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-17       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Methylation index as means of quantification of the compliance of sedimentary mercury to be methylated.

Authors:  Jacek Bełdowski; Michał Miotk; Janusz Pempkowiak
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2015-07-10       Impact factor: 2.513

7.  Contribution of Shellfish Consumption to Lower Mercury Health Risk for Residents in Northern Jiaozhou Bay, China.

Authors:  Lei Zhang; Lei Zhang
Journal:  Bioinorg Chem Appl       Date:  2015-05-25       Impact factor: 7.778

8.  Factors Affecting Elevated Arsenic and Methyl Mercury Concentrations in Small Shield Lakes Surrounding Gold Mines near the Yellowknife, NT, (Canada) Region.

Authors:  Adam James Houben; Rebecca D'Onofrio; Steven V Kokelj; Jules M Blais
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-04-06       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Anaerobic microbial community response to methanogenic inhibitors 2-bromoethanesulfonate and propynoic acid.

Authors:  Tara M Webster; Adam L Smith; Raghav R Reddy; Ameet J Pinto; Kim F Hayes; Lutgarde Raskin
Journal:  Microbiologyopen       Date:  2016-03-14       Impact factor: 3.139

10.  Challenges and opportunities for managing aquatic mercury pollution in altered landscapes.

Authors:  Heileen Hsu-Kim; Chris S Eckley; Dario Achá; Xinbin Feng; Cynthia C Gilmour; Sofi Jonsson; Carl P J Mitchell
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 5.129

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.