Literature DB >> 31028624

Optimization of pretreatment procedure for MeHg determination in sediments and its applications.

Xiaonan Ji1,2, Chengbin Liu1,2, Jianbo Shi1, Gang Pan3,4,5,6.   

Abstract

Methylmercury (MeHg) in sediment is difficult to be determined due to its low concentration and binding compounds like sulfide and organic matter. Moreover, wet sediment samples have been suggested to behave differently from certified reference materials in MeHg analysis. Optimal pretreatment procedure for MeHg determination in sediments has not been ascertained and whether the procedure could apply to sediment samples with complex matrix merits further research. This work firstly compared recovery results of five pretreatment procedures for MeHg determination using ERM-CC580. Using the optimal pretreatment procedure, recovery results were analyzed in different sediment samples after manipulation of moisture content, organic matter, and acid volatile sulfide. The procedure using CuSO4/HNO3 as leaching solutions and mechanical shaking as extraction method was proved to produce the most satisfactory recovery results (100.67 ± 6.75%, mean ± standard deviation). And when moisture content varied from 20 to 80%, average recovery results in sediment samples ranged from 100 to 125%. Furthermore, before and after the manipulation of organic matter or acid volatile sulfide, spiking recovery results varied little and were all within acceptable limit (85~105%). Therefore, the procedure of CuSO4/HNO3-mechanical is proposed as a universal pretreatment method for MeHg determination in sediment samples with various characteristics.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acid volatile sulfide; Methylmercury; Moisture content; Organic matter; Pretreatment; Sediment

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31028624     DOI: 10.1007/s11356-019-05179-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int        ISSN: 0944-1344            Impact factor:   4.223


  26 in total

1.  Contribution of coexisting sulfate and iron reducing bacteria to methylmercury production in freshwater river sediments.

Authors:  Ri-Qing Yu; J R Flanders; E Erin Mack; Ralph Turner; M Bilal Mirza; Tamar Barkay
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2012-02-09       Impact factor: 9.028

Review 2.  The toxicology of mercury and its chemical compounds.

Authors:  Thomas W Clarkson; Laszlo Magos
Journal:  Crit Rev Toxicol       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 5.635

3.  Whole-ecosystem study shows rapid fish-mercury response to changes in mercury deposition.

Authors:  Reed C Harris; John W M Rudd; Marc Amyot; Christopher L Babiarz; Ken G Beaty; Paul J Blanchfield; R A Bodaly; Brian A Branfireun; Cynthia C Gilmour; Jennifer A Graydon; Andrew Heyes; Holger Hintelmann; James P Hurley; Carol A Kelly; David P Krabbenhoft; Steve E Lindberg; Robert P Mason; Michael J Paterson; Cheryl L Podemski; Art Robinson; Ken A Sandilands; George R Southworth; Vincent L St Louis; Michael T Tate
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-09-27       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Simple solvent extraction technique for elimination of matrix interferences in the determination of methylmercury in environmental and biological samples by ethylation-gas chromatography-cold vapor atomic fluorescence spectrometry.

Authors:  L Liang; M Horvat; E Cernichiari; B Gelein; S Balogh
Journal:  Talanta       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 6.057

5.  Organic material: the primary control on mercury methylation and ambient methyl mercury concentrations in estuarine sediments.

Authors:  Lars Lambertsson; Mats Nilsson
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2006-03-15       Impact factor: 9.028

6.  Methylmercury production in soil in the water-level-fluctuating zone of the Three Gorges Reservoir, China: The key role of low-molecular-weight organic acids.

Authors:  Deliang Yin; Yongmin Wang; Tao Jiang; Caiqing Qin; Yuping Xiang; Qiuyu Chen; Jinping Xue; Dingyong Wang
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2018-01-04       Impact factor: 8.071

7.  Mechanism of Accumulation of Methylmercury in Rice ( Oryza sativa L.) in a Mercury Mining Area.

Authors:  Zhangwei Wang; Ting Sun; Charles T Driscoll; Yongguang Yin; Xiaoshan Zhang
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2018-08-21       Impact factor: 9.028

8.  Mercury distribution and speciation in water and fish from abandoned Hg mines in Wanshan, Guizhou province, China.

Authors:  Guangle Qiu; Xinbin Feng; Shaofeng Wang; Xuewu Fu; Lihai Shang
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2009-07-03       Impact factor: 7.963

Review 9.  Mercury pollution in Asia: a review of the contaminated sites.

Authors:  P Li; X B Feng; G L Qiu; L H Shang; Z G Li
Journal:  J Hazard Mater       Date:  2009-03-18       Impact factor: 10.588

10.  Spectrophotometric determination of iron(II) with 1,10-phenanthroline in the presence of large amounts of iron(III).

Authors:  H Tamura; K Goto; T Yotsuyanagi; M Nagayama
Journal:  Talanta       Date:  1974-04       Impact factor: 6.057

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.