Literature DB >> 25482136

Opportunities to integrate new approaches in genetic toxicology: an ILSI-HESI workshop report.

Errol Zeiger1, Bhaskar Gollapudi, Marilyn J Aardema, Scott Auerbach, Darrell Boverhof, Laura Custer, Peter Dedon, Masamitsu Honma, Seiichi Ishida, Andrea L Kasinski, James H Kim, Mugimane G Manjanatha, Jennifer Marlowe, Stefan Pfuhler, Igor Pogribny, William Slikker, Leon F Stankowski, Jennifer Y Tanir, Raymond Tice, Jan van Benthem, Paul White, Kristine L Witt, Véronique Thybaud.   

Abstract

Genetic toxicity tests currently used to identify and characterize potential human mutagens and carcinogens rely on measurements of primary DNA damage, gene mutation, and chromosome damage in vitro and in rodents. The International Life Sciences Institute Health and Environmental Sciences Institute (ILSI-HESI) Committee on the Relevance and Follow-up of Positive Results in In Vitro Genetic Toxicity Testing held an April 2012 Workshop in Washington, DC, to consider the impact of new understanding of biology and new technologies on the identification and characterization of genotoxic substances, and to identify new approaches to inform more accurate human risk assessment for genetic and carcinogenic effects. Workshop organizers and speakers were from industry, academe, and government. The Workshop focused on biological effects and technologies that would potentially yield the most useful information for evaluating human risk of genetic damage. Also addressed was the impact that improved understanding of biology and availability of new techniques might have on genetic toxicology practices. Workshop topics included (1) alternative experimental models to improve genetic toxicity testing, (2) Biomarkers of epigenetic changes and their applicability to genetic toxicology, and (3) new technologies and approaches. The ability of these new tests and technologies to be developed into tests to identify and characterize genotoxic agents; to serve as a bridge between in vitro and in vivo rodent, or preferably human, data; or to be used to provide dose response information for quantitative risk assessment was also addressed. A summary of the workshop and links to the scientific presentations are provided.
© 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  epigenetics; genetic toxicity; genomics; mutation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25482136      PMCID: PMC4615680          DOI: 10.1002/em.21923

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen        ISSN: 0893-6692            Impact factor:   3.216


  3 in total

1.  Quantitative approaches for assessing dose-response relationships in genetic toxicology studies.

Authors:  B B Gollapudi; G E Johnson; L G Hernandez; L H Pottenger; K L Dearfield; A M Jeffrey; E Julien; J H Kim; D P Lovell; J T Macgregor; M M Moore; J van Benthem; P A White; E Zeiger; V Thybaud
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  2012-09-18       Impact factor: 3.216

Review 2.  New and emerging technologies for genetic toxicity testing.

Authors:  Anthony M Lynch; Jennifer C Sasaki; Rosalie Elespuru; David Jacobson-Kram; Véronique Thybaud; Marlies De Boeck; Marilyn J Aardema; Jiri Aubrecht; R Daniel Benz; Stephen D Dertinger; George R Douglas; Paul A White; Patricia A Escobar; Albert Fornace; Masamitsu Honma; Russell T Naven; James F Rusling; Robert H Schiestl; Richard M Walmsley; Eiji Yamamura; Jan van Benthem; James H Kim
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  2010-08-25       Impact factor: 3.216

3.  Derivation of point of departure (PoD) estimates in genetic toxicology studies and their potential applications in risk assessment.

Authors:  G E Johnson; L G Soeteman-Hernández; B B Gollapudi; O G Bodger; K L Dearfield; R H Heflich; J G Hixon; D P Lovell; J T MacGregor; L H Pottenger; C M Thompson; L Abraham; V Thybaud; J Y Tanir; E Zeiger; J van Benthem; P A White
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  2014-05-06       Impact factor: 3.216

  3 in total
  5 in total

1.  Genetic toxicology in silico protocol.

Authors:  Catrin Hasselgren; Ernst Ahlberg; Yumi Akahori; Alexander Amberg; Lennart T Anger; Franck Atienzar; Scott Auerbach; Lisa Beilke; Phillip Bellion; Romualdo Benigni; Joel Bercu; Ewan D Booth; Dave Bower; Alessandro Brigo; Zoryana Cammerer; Mark T D Cronin; Ian Crooks; Kevin P Cross; Laura Custer; Krista Dobo; Tatyana Doktorova; David Faulkner; Kevin A Ford; Marie C Fortin; Markus Frericks; Samantha E Gad-McDonald; Nichola Gellatly; Helga Gerets; Véronique Gervais; Susanne Glowienke; Jacky Van Gompel; James S Harvey; Jedd Hillegass; Masamitsu Honma; Jui-Hua Hsieh; Chia-Wen Hsu; Tara S Barton-Maclaren; Candice Johnson; Robert Jolly; David Jones; Ray Kemper; Michelle O Kenyon; Naomi L Kruhlak; Sunil A Kulkarni; Klaus Kümmerer; Penny Leavitt; Scott Masten; Scott Miller; Chandrika Moudgal; Wolfgang Muster; Alexandre Paulino; Elena Lo Piparo; Mark Powley; Donald P Quigley; M Vijayaray Reddy; Andrea-Nicole Richarz; Benoit Schilter; Ronald D Snyder; Lidiya Stavitskaya; Reinhard Stidl; David T Szabo; Andrew Teasdale; Raymond R Tice; Alejandra Trejo-Martin; Anna Vuorinen; Brian A Wall; Pete Watts; Angela T White; Joerg Wichard; Kristine L Witt; Adam Woolley; David Woolley; Craig Zwickl; Glenn J Myatt
Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  2019-06-11       Impact factor: 3.271

2.  Validation of the hen's egg test for micronucleus induction (HET-MN): detailed protocol including scoring atlas, historical control data and statistical analysis.

Authors:  Katrin Maul; Dagmar Fieblinger; Andreas Heppenheimer; Juergen Kreutz; Manfred Liebsch; Andreas Luch; Ralph Pirow; Albrecht Poth; Pamela Strauch; Eva Dony; Markus Schulz; Thorsten Wolf; Kerstin Reisinger
Journal:  Mutagenesis       Date:  2022-05-04       Impact factor: 2.954

3.  Validation of the 3D reconstructed human skin micronucleus (RSMN) assay: an animal-free alternative for following-up positive results from standard in vitro genotoxicity assays.

Authors:  Stefan Pfuhler; Thomas R Downs; Nicola J Hewitt; Sebastian Hoffmann; Greg C Mun; Gladys Ouedraogo; Shambhu Roy; Rodger D Curren; Marilyn J Aardema
Journal:  Mutagenesis       Date:  2021-04-28       Impact factor: 3.000

4.  Considerations for Using Genetic and Epigenetic Information in Occupational Health Risk Assessment and Standard Setting.

Authors:  P A Schulte; C Whittaker; C P Curran
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.155

5.  Validation of the 3D reconstructed human skin Comet assay, an animal-free alternative for following-up positive results from standard in vitro genotoxicity assays.

Authors:  Stefan Pfuhler; Ralph Pirow; Thomas R Downs; Andrea Haase; Nicola Hewitt; Andreas Luch; Marion Merkel; Claudia Petrick; André Said; Monika Schäfer-Korting; Kerstin Reisinger
Journal:  Mutagenesis       Date:  2021-04-28       Impact factor: 3.000

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.