Literature DB >> 25481713

Comparison of China-US Engineering Ethics Educations in Sino-Western Philosophies of Technology.

Gui Hong Cao1.   

Abstract

Ethics education has become essential in modern engineering. Ethics education in engineering has been increasingly implemented worldwide. It can improve ethical behaviors in technology and engineering design under the guidance of the philosophy of technology. Hence, this study aims to compare China-US engineering ethics education in Sino-Western philosophies of technology by using literature studies, online surveys, observational researches, textual analyses, and comparative methods. In my original theoretical framework and model of input and output for education, six primary variables emerge in the pedagogy: disciplinary statuses, educational goals, instructional contents, didactic models, teaching methods, and edificatory effects. I focus on the similarities and differences of engineering ethics educations between China and the U.S. in Chinese and Western philosophies of technology. In the field of engineering, the U.S. tends toward applied ethics training, whereas China inclines toward practical moral education. The U.S. is the leader, particularly in the amount of money invested and engineering results. China has quickened its pace, focusing specifically on engineering labor input and output. Engineering ethics is a multiplayer game effected at various levels among (a) lower level technicians and engineers, engineering associations, and stockholders; (b) middle ranking engineering ethics education, the ministry of education, the academy of engineering, and the philosophy of technology; and (c) top national and international technological policies. I propose that professional engineering ethics education can play many important roles in reforming engineering social responsibility by international cooperation in societies that are becoming increasingly reliant on engineered devices and systems. Significantly, my proposals contribute to improving engineering ethics education and better-solving engineering ethics issues, thereby maximizing engineering sustainability.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Codes of engineering ethics; Engineering education; Engineering ethics; Pedagogy; Philosophy of technology; Social responsibility

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25481713     DOI: 10.1007/s11948-014-9611-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics        ISSN: 1353-3452            Impact factor:   3.525


  7 in total

1.  Investigating ethical issues in engineering design.

Authors:  I van de Poel
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 3.525

2.  The professional approach to engineering ethics: five research questions.

Authors:  M Davis
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 3.525

3.  Ethics as a core competency in science and engineering.

Authors:  Stephanie J Bird
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 3.525

4.  "Mind the gaps": an empirical approach to engineering ethics, 1997-2001.

Authors:  Robert E McGinn
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 3.525

5.  The dilemma of ethics in engineering education.

Authors:  Byron Newberry
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 3.525

6.  Ways of thinking about and teaching ethical problem solving: microethics and macroethics in engineering.

Authors:  Joseph R Herkert
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 3.525

7.  Teaching ethics in science and engineering: effective online education.

Authors:  Stephanie J Bird; Joan E Sieber
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 3.525

  7 in total
  3 in total

1.  A Systematic Literature Review of US Engineering Ethics Interventions.

Authors:  Justin L Hess; Grant Fore
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2017-04-11       Impact factor: 3.525

2.  Development of Ethics Education in Science and Technology in Technical Universities in China : Commentary on "Ethics 'upfront': Generating an Organizational Framework for a New University of Technology".

Authors:  Qian Wang; Ping Yan
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 3.525

3.  Engineers' Moral Responsibility: A Confucian Perspective.

Authors:  Shan Jing; Neelke Doorn
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2019-02-26       Impact factor: 3.525

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.