Literature DB >> 20457582

Activation-deactivation rapid palatal expansion and reverse headgear in Class III cases.

Devrim Isci1, Tamer Turk, Selma Elekdag-Turk.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the dentofacial effects of 1 week rapid palatal expansion (RPE) and activation-deactivation (A/D) RPE protocols with reverse headgear (RH). Two groups, each containing 15 subjects, were included in this study. In the RPE group (seven males and eight females, 11.94 ± 1.62 years), Hyrax screws were activated every 12 hours for 1 week. At the end of this period, RPE was stopped and the patients were instructed to wear the RH. In the A/D-RPE group (seven males and eight females, 11.34 ± 1.81 years), the screws were activated every 12 hours for 1 week. Subsequently, the screws were deactivated every 12 hours for 1 week followed by activation and deactivation for the following 2 weeks. After this protocol, the patients were instructed to use the RH. A total force of 700 g was applied to both groups for 16-18 hours/day for the first 3 months, for 12 hours/day for the second 3 months, and for 6 hours/day for the second 6 months. Lateral cephalometric films were taken before treatment (T1) and at the end of the first (T2) and second (T3) 6 months to evaluate the dentofacial changes. Intragroup differences of each landmark at T2-T1, T3-T2, and T3-T1 were analysed with a paired t-test (P < 0.016), and intergroup differences were compared with an independent t-test (P < 0.05). Anterior movement of point A (4.13 mm) for the A/D-RPE group was approximately twice of the RPE group (2.33 mm; P < 0.001). Backward movement of the mandible showed no significant difference between the groups. Anterior face height increases did not demonstrate significant differences between the groups. The pronounced anterior movement of point A demonstrates that the A/D-RPE procedure positively affects maxillary protraction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20457582     DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cjq006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Orthod        ISSN: 0141-5387            Impact factor:   3.075


  15 in total

Review 1.  Effectiveness of maxillary protraction using facemask with or without maxillary expansion: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Moritz Foersch; Collin Jacobs; Susanne Wriedt; Marlene Hechtner; Heinrich Wehrbein
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2015-05-19       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Maxillary protraction in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate : Evaluation of soft and hard tissues using the Alt-RAMEC protocol.

Authors:  Ege Dogan; Ozlem Seckin
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2020-03-27       Impact factor: 1.938

3.  Does Maxillary Protraction with Alt-RAMEC Protocol Affect Inferior Sclera Exposure? A Controlled 3dMD Study.

Authors:  Yasemin Bahar Acar; Hanife Nuray Yılmaz; Elvan Önem Özbilen
Journal:  Turk J Orthod       Date:  2022-03

4.  Does the Alternate Rapid Maxillary ExpansionConstriction/Reverse Headgear Therapy Enhance Pharyngeal Airway Dimensions?

Authors:  Nivethitha Bhaskar; Shobha Sundareswaran; Latheef Vadakkeypeediakkal; Praveen Santhakumar; Sreehari Sathyanathan
Journal:  Turk J Orthod       Date:  2022-03

5.  Comparative characterization of maxillary expansion and alternate maxillary expansions and constrictions in rats.

Authors:  Guang-Yao Feng; Bing-Shuang Zou; Xiang-Long Zeng
Journal:  J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci       Date:  2014-12-06

6.  Three-dimensional evaluation of treatment results of the Alt-RAMEC and facemask protocol in growing patients.

Authors:  V Sitaropoulou; H N Yilmaz; B Yilmaz; N Kucukkeles
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2020-07-16       Impact factor: 1.938

7.  Comparison of the Changes Following Two Treatment Approaches: Rapid Maxillary Expansion Versus Alternate Rapid Maxillary Expansion and Constriction.

Authors:  Fatih Çelebi; Murat Çelikdelen
Journal:  Turk J Orthod       Date:  2020-03-01

8.  Is alternate rapid maxillary expansion and constriction an effective protocol in the treatment of Class III malocclusion? A systematic review.

Authors:  Matheus Melo Pithon; Nathalia de Lima Santos; Camila Rangel Barreto Dos Santos; Felipe Carvalho Souza Baião; Murilo Costa Rangel Pinheiro; Manoel Matos; Ianderlei Andrade Souza; Rafael Pereira de Paula
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2016 Nov-Dec

Review 9.  Bone- and dentoalveolar-anchored dentofacial orthopedics for Class III malocclusion: new approaches, similar objectives? : a systematic review.

Authors:  Marta Morales-Fernández; Alejandro Iglesias-Linares; Rosa Maria Yañez-Vico; Asuncion Mendoza-Mendoza; Enrique Solano-Reina
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2012-09-26       Impact factor: 2.079

10.  Effects of rapid maxillary expansion or alternating rapid maxillary expansion and constriction on nasal mucociliary clearance : A randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Zeynep Çoban Büyükbayraktar; Cenk Doruk; Mansur Doğan; Gökcan Ertaş
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 1.938

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.