Literature DB >> 9699402

Cephalometric and occlusal changes following maxillary expansion and protraction.

P Ngan1, C Yiu, A Hu, U Hägg, S H Wei, E Gunel.   

Abstract

A prospective clinical trial was conducted to determine the cephalometric and occlusal changes following maxillary expansion and protraction. Twenty Southern Chinese patients (eight males and 12 females with a mean age of 8.4 +/- 1.8 years) with skeletal Class III malocclusions were treated consecutively with maxillary expansion and a protraction facemask. Growth adaptation of these patients was followed for 2 years after removal of the appliances and compared with a control group of subjects with no treatment. Lateral cephalometric radiographs were used to quantify the skeletal and dental changes before treatment (T1), immediately after treatment (T2) and 2 years after removal of appliances (T3). With 8 months of treatment (T2-T1), overjet was overcorrected from a -2.0 to 3.5 mm. The maxilla moved forwards by an average of 2.1 mm and the molar relationship was improved to a Class I dental arch relationship. The palatal and occlusal planes were tilted upward 1.0 and 2.0 degrees, respectively. Two years following removal of the appliances (T3-T2), a positive overjet was maintained in 18 out of 20 patients. The maxilla continued to move forwards in the treated subjects similar to the controls. The mandible outgrew the maxilia. In most instances, dental compensation with proclination of the maxillary incisors was observed. The palatal plane returned to pre-treatment value. The occlusal plane continued to tilt upward due to eruption of the molars and proclination of the incisors. Analysis of dental casts showed a significant increase in maxillary intercanine (2.2 mm) and intermolar widths (2.3 mm) with 7 days of rapid palatal expansion followed by maxillary protraction. The percentage relapse in maxillary intermolar widths was 30-45 per cent after 1 year, in most cases with minimal retention. In the mandibular arch, the concurrent increase in intermolar width (2.3 mm) was primarily due to buccal uprighting of the posterior molars when the maxilla was protracted into a Class I skeletal relationship and was stable after 1 year. The results of this study indicate stability of orthopaedic treatment of Class III malocclusions directed at the maxilla. Despite some relapse, a net improvement in maxillomandibular relationship and a positive overjet was maintained in 18 out of 20 patients at the end of the follow-up period.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9699402     DOI: 10.1093/ejo/20.3.237

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Orthod        ISSN: 0141-5387            Impact factor:   3.075


  27 in total

1.  Zygomaticomaxillary suture maturation: Part II-The influence of sutural maturation on the response to maxillary protraction.

Authors:  F Angelieri; A C Ruellas; M S Yatabe; L H S Cevidanes; L Franchi; C Toyama-Hino; H J De Clerck; T Nguyen; J A McNamara
Journal:  Orthod Craniofac Res       Date:  2017-06-29       Impact factor: 1.826

2.  Factors associated with long-term vertical skeletal changes induced by facemask therapy in patients with Class III malocclusion.

Authors:  Hee-Jong Kwak; Hae-Jin Park; Yoon-Ji Kim; Dong-Yul Lee
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2017-11-13       Impact factor: 2.079

3.  Stability of maxillary protraction therapy in children with Class III malocclusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yifan Lin; Runzhi Guo; Liyu Hou; Zhen Fu; Weiran Li
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2018-02-10       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Bonded versus banded rapid palatal expander followed by facial mask therapy: analysis on digital dental casts.

Authors:  Roberta Lione; Luis Tomas Huanca Ghislanzoni; Efisio Defraia; Lorenzo Franchi; Paola Cozza
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  2015-06-11       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Treatment of Class III malocclusion using miniscrew-anchored inverted Forsus FRD: Controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  Osama Eissa; Mahmoud ElShennawy; Safaa Gaballah; Ghada ElMehy; Tarek El-Bialy
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2018-06-18       Impact factor: 2.079

6.  Zygomaticomaxillary suture maturation: A predictor of maxillary protraction? Part I - A classification method.

Authors:  F Angelieri; L Franchi; L H S Cevidanes; C T Hino; T Nguyen; J A McNamara
Journal:  Orthod Craniofac Res       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 1.826

7.  Effects of facemask treatment anchored with miniplates after alternate rapid maxillary expansions and constrictions; a pilot study.

Authors:  Demet Kaya; Ilken Kocadereli; Bahadir Kan; Ferda Tasar
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-02-07       Impact factor: 2.079

8.  A comparison of two different techniques for early correction of Class III malocclusion.

Authors:  J Seehra; P S Fleming; N Mandall; A T Dibiase
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-08-01       Impact factor: 2.079

9.  Comparative characterization of maxillary expansion and alternate maxillary expansions and constrictions in rats.

Authors:  Guang-Yao Feng; Bing-Shuang Zou; Xiang-Long Zeng
Journal:  J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci       Date:  2014-12-06

10.  Reverse Forsus vs. facemask/rapid palatal expansion appliances in growing subjects with mild class III malocclusions : A randomized controlled clinical study.

Authors:  Mehmet Ali Yavan; Aysegul Gulec; Metin Orhan
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2021-07-16       Impact factor: 1.938

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.