Literature DB >> 25480064

Discrimination of frequency variance for tonal sequences.

Andrew J Byrne1, Neal F Viemeister1, Mark A Stellmack1.   

Abstract

Real-world auditory stimuli are highly variable across occurrences and sources. The present study examined the sensitivity of human listeners to differences in global stimulus variability. In a two-interval, forced-choice task, variance discrimination was measured using sequences of five 100-ms tone pulses. The frequency of each pulse was sampled randomly from a distribution that was Gaussian in logarithmic frequency. In the non-signal interval, the sampled distribution had a variance of σSTAN (2), while in the signal interval, the variance of the sequence was σSIG (2) (with σSIG (2) >  σSTAN (2)). The listener's task was to choose the interval with the larger variance. To constrain possible decision strategies, the mean frequency of the sampling distribution of each interval was randomly chosen for each presentation. Psychometric functions were measured for various values of σSTAN (2). Although the performance was remarkably similar across listeners, overall performance was poorer than that of an ideal observer (IO) which perfectly compares interval variances. However, like the IO, Weber's Law behavior was observed, with a constant ratio of ( σSIG (2)- σSTAN (2)) to σSTAN (2) yielding similar performance. A model which degraded the IO with a frequency-resolution noise and a computational noise provided a reasonable fit to the real data.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25480064      PMCID: PMC4257963          DOI: 10.1121/1.4900825

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  9 in total

1.  The "proportion-of-the-total-duration rule" for the discrimination of auditory patterns.

Authors:  G R Kidd; C S Watson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Informational masking for simultaneous nonspeech stimuli: psychometric functions for fixed and randomly mixed maskers.

Authors:  Nathaniel I Durlach; Christine R Mason; Frederick J Gallun; Barbara Shinn-Cunningham; H Steven Colburn; Gerald Kidd
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Informational processing of complex sound. III: interference.

Authors:  R A Lutfi
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Effect of temporal position, proportional variance, and proportional duration on decision weights in temporal pattern discrimination.

Authors:  T Sadralodabai; R D Sorkin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Factors in the discrimination of tonal patterns. II. Selective attention and learning under various levels of stimulus uncertainty.

Authors:  C S Watson; W J Kelly; H W Wroton
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1976-11       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Psychometric functions for the discrimination of spectral variance.

Authors:  R A Lutfi; K A Doherty; E Oh
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  The effects of unmodulated carrier fringes on the detection of frequency modulation.

Authors:  Andrew J Byrne; Neal F Viemeister; Mark A Stellmack
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Variability discrimination in humans and animals: implications for adaptive action.

Authors:  Edward A Wasserman; Michael E Young; Robert G Cook
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  2004-12

9.  A 'dipper' function for texture discrimination based on orientation variance.

Authors:  Michael Morgan; Charles Chubb; Joshua A Solomon
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2008-08-22       Impact factor: 2.240

  9 in total
  1 in total

1.  Evidence for a Global Sampling Process in Extraction of Summary Statistics of Item Sizes in a Set.

Authors:  Midori Tokita; Sachiyo Ueda; Akira Ishiguchi
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-05-13
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.