Literature DB >> 15584822

Variability discrimination in humans and animals: implications for adaptive action.

Edward A Wasserman1, Michael E Young, Robert G Cook.   

Abstract

Both humans and animals live in a rich world of events. Some events repeat themselves, whereas others constantly change. The authors propose that discriminating this stability, sameness, and uniformity from change, differentness, and diversity is fundamental to adaptive action. Evidence from many areas of behavioral science indicates that the discrimination of and preference for stimulus variability affects both human and animal action. Recent comparative research with humans and animals illustrates a promising approach to the study of these issues. Discovering and understanding the behavioral and neural processes related to stimulus variability and its consequences for behavior offer distinctive challenges and important new opportunities for psychologists and neuroscientists. ((c) 2004 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15584822     DOI: 10.1037/0003-066X.59.9.879

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Psychol        ISSN: 0003-066X


  14 in total

1.  Optimal inference of sameness.

Authors:  Ronald van den Berg; Michael Vogel; Kresimir Josic; Wei Ji Ma
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-02-06       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Monitoring same/different discrimination behavior in time and space: finding differences and anticipatory discrimination behavior.

Authors:  Daniel I Brooks; Edward A Wasserman
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2010-04

3.  Same/different discrimination learning with trial-unique stimuli.

Authors:  Daniel I Brooks; Edward A Wasserman
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2008-06

4.  Issues in the Comparative Cognition of Abstract-Concept Learning.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Katz; Anthony A Wright; Kent D Bodily
Journal:  Comp Cogn Behav Rev       Date:  2007-01-01

5.  Discrimination of frequency variance for tonal sequences.

Authors:  Andrew J Byrne; Neal F Viemeister; Mark A Stellmack
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  No evidence for feature binding by pigeons in a change detection task.

Authors:  Olga F Lazareva; Edward A Wasserman
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2015-09-21       Impact factor: 1.777

7.  Too much of a good thing? Variety is confusing in mate choice.

Authors:  Alison P Lenton; Marco Francesconi
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2011-03-02       Impact factor: 3.703

8.  Effects of stimulus size and spatial organization on pigeons' conditional same-different discrimination.

Authors:  Leyre Castro; Edward A Wasserman
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 1.777

9.  Detection and discrimination of complex sounds by pigeons (Columba livia).

Authors:  Robert G Cook; Muhammad A J Qadri; Ryan Oliveira
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2015-11-23       Impact factor: 1.777

10.  Effects of number of items and visual display variability on same-different discrimination behavior.

Authors:  Leyre Castro; Michael E Young; Edward A Wasserman
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.