Literature DB >> 23363116

The effects of unmodulated carrier fringes on the detection of frequency modulation.

Andrew J Byrne1, Neal F Viemeister, Mark A Stellmack.   

Abstract

Detection thresholds for 100 ms of either 5- or 20-Hz frequency modulation (FM) were measured at various temporal positions within a 600-ms, 4-kHz pure-tone carrier. The results indicated that the temporal position of the signal relative to the fringe influences detection thresholds, including an effect that is reminiscent of auditory backward recognition masking. A task involving frequency increments, rather than sinusoidal FM, yielded similar results. Additional manipulation of total carrier duration indicated that FM detection thresholds improve as the duration of the forward fringe increases, while a backward fringe only degrades performance in the absence of any forward fringe. The results suggest that listeners are insensitive to subtle frequency changes that occur at the onset of a longer stimulus and that the interaction between the opposing effects of the forward and backward fringes is not additive.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23363116      PMCID: PMC3574128          DOI: 10.1121/1.4773353

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  16 in total

1.  Short-term adaptation of auditory receptive fields to dynamic stimuli.

Authors:  Mark N Kvale; Christoph E Schreiner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Temporal recognition masking--or interference?

Authors:  D W Sparks
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1976-12       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Backward recognition masking.

Authors:  D W Massaro
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1975-11       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Forward masking of frequency modulation.

Authors:  Andrew J Byrne; Magdalena Wojtczak; Neal F Viemeister
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Frequency discrimination in the presence of another tone.

Authors:  B Leshowitz; E Cudahy
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1973-10       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Changes in frequency discrimination caused by leading and trailing tones.

Authors:  D A Ronken
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1972-06       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Pitch of tone bursts of changing frequency.

Authors:  I V Nábĕlek; A K Nábĕlek; I J Hirsh
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1970-08       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics.

Authors:  H Levitt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1971-02       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Frequency discrimination for pulsed versus modulated tones.

Authors:  H Fastl
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1978-01       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Theory of frequency modulation detection for low modulation frequencies.

Authors:  W M Hartmann; M A Klein
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1980-03       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  2 in total

1.  Discrimination of frequency variance for tonal sequences.

Authors:  Andrew J Byrne; Neal F Viemeister; Mark A Stellmack
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Encoding frequency contrast in primate auditory cortex.

Authors:  Brian J Malone; Brian H Scott; Malcolm N Semple
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-03-05       Impact factor: 2.714

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.