Literature DB >> 25479736

Cognitive effects and autonomic responses to transcranial pulsed current stimulation.

Leon Morales-Quezada1, Camila Cosmo, Sandra Carvalho, Jorge Leite, Laura Castillo-Saavedra, Joanna R Rozisky, Felipe Fregni.   

Abstract

Transcranial pulsed current stimulation (tPCS) is emerging as an option in the field of neuromodulation; however, little is known about its effects on cognition and behavior and its neurophysiological correlates as indexed by autonomic responses. Our aim was to identify the effects of tPCS on arithmetic processing and risk-taking behavior, and to further categorize physiological autonomic responses by heart rate variability (HRV) and electrodermal activity measurements before, during, and after exposure to task performance and stimulation. Thirty healthy volunteers were randomized to receive a single session of sham or active stimulation with a current intensity of 2 mA and a random frequency between 1 and 5 Hz. Our results showed that tPCS has a modest and specific effect on cognitive performance as indexed by the cognitive tasks chosen in this study. There was a modest effect of active tPCS only on performance facilitation on a complex-level mathematical task as compared to sham stimulation. On autonomic responses, we observed that HRV total power increased while LF/HF ratio decreased in the tPCS active group compared to sham. There were no group differences for adverse effects. Based on our results, we conclude that tPCS, in healthy subjects, has a modest and specific cognitive effect as shown by the facilitation of arithmetical processing on complex mathematical task. These effects are accompanied by modulation of the central autonomic network providing sympathetic-vagal balance during stressful conditions. Although behavioral results were modest, they contribute to the understanding of tPCS effects and cognitive enhancement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25479736     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-014-4147-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  23 in total

1.  The use of cranial electrotherapy stimulation in the management of chronic pain: A review.

Authors:  Daniel L. Kirsch; Ray B. Smith
Journal:  NeuroRehabilitation       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.138

2.  Vagal influence on working memory and attention.

Authors:  Anita Lill Hansen; Bjørn Helge Johnsen; Julian F Thayer
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 2.997

3.  To retrieve or to calculate? Left angular gyrus mediates the retrieval of arithmetic facts during problem solving.

Authors:  Roland H Grabner; Daniel Ansari; Karl Koschutnig; Gernot Reishofer; Franz Ebner; Christa Neuper
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2008-10-21       Impact factor: 3.139

4.  Heart rate variability. Standards of measurement, physiological interpretation, and clinical use. Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and the North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology.

Authors: 
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 29.983

5.  Training-related brain plasticity in subjects at risk of developing Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Sylvie Belleville; Francis Clément; Samira Mellah; Brigitte Gilbert; Francine Fontaine; Serge Gauthier
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2011-03-22       Impact factor: 13.501

6.  Combining transcranial direct current stimulation and neuroimaging: novel insights in understanding neuroplasticity.

Authors:  Anusha Venkatakrishnan; Marco Sandrini
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 7.  Behavioural facilitation following brain stimulation: implications for neurorehabilitation.

Authors:  Giuseppe Vallar; Nadia Bolognini
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rehabil       Date:  2011-05-27       Impact factor: 2.868

Review 8.  Can noninvasive brain stimulation enhance cognition in neuropsychiatric disorders?

Authors:  Asli Demirtas-Tatlidede; Andrew M Vahabzadeh-Hagh; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Neuropharmacology       Date:  2012-06-28       Impact factor: 5.250

Review 9.  Brain plasticity and motor practice in cognitive aging.

Authors:  Liuyang Cai; John S Y Chan; Jin H Yan; Kaiping Peng
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2014-03-10       Impact factor: 5.750

Review 10.  From the heart to the mind: cardiac vagal tone modulates top-down and bottom-up visual perception and attention to emotional stimuli.

Authors:  Gewnhi Park; Julian F Thayer
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-05-01
View more
  9 in total

1.  Neural signature of tDCS, tPCS and their combination: Comparing the effects on neural plasticity.

Authors:  Aurore Thibaut; Cristina Russo; Leon Morales-Quezada; Aura Hurtado-Puerto; Alícia Deitos; Steven Freedman; Sandra Carvalho; Felipe Fregni
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2016-10-17       Impact factor: 3.046

2.  Patterns of brain oscillations across different electrode montages in transcranial pulsed current stimulation.

Authors:  Alejandra C Vasquez; Aurore Thibaut; Leon Morales-Quezada; Jorge Leite; Felipe Fregni
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2017-05-24       Impact factor: 1.837

3.  Home-based transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and motor imagery for phantom limb pain using statistical learning to predict treatment response: an open-label study protocol.

Authors:  Kevin Pacheco-Barrios; Alejandra Cardenas-Rojas; Paulo S de Melo; Anna Marduy; Paola Gonzalez-Mego; Luis Castelo-Branco; Augusto J Mendes; Karen Vásquez-Ávila; Paulo E P Teixeira; Anna Carolyna Lepesteur Gianlorenco; Felipe Fregni
Journal:  Princ Pract Clin Res       Date:  2021-12-27

4.  Tolerability of Repeated Application of Transcranial Electrical Stimulation with Limited Outputs to Healthy Subjects.

Authors:  Bhaskar Paneri; Devin Adair; Chris Thomas; Niranjan Khadka; Vaishali Patel; William J Tyler; Lucas Parra; Marom Bikson
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2016-05-24       Impact factor: 8.955

Review 5.  Safety of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation: Evidence Based Update 2016.

Authors:  Marom Bikson; Pnina Grossman; Chris Thomas; Adantchede Louis Zannou; Jimmy Jiang; Tatheer Adnan; Antonios P Mourdoukoutas; Greg Kronberg; Dennis Truong; Paulo Boggio; André R Brunoni; Leigh Charvet; Felipe Fregni; Brita Fritsch; Bernadette Gillick; Roy H Hamilton; Benjamin M Hampstead; Ryan Jankord; Adam Kirton; Helena Knotkova; David Liebetanz; Anli Liu; Colleen Loo; Michael A Nitsche; Janine Reis; Jessica D Richardson; Alexander Rotenberg; Peter E Turkeltaub; Adam J Woods
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2016-06-15       Impact factor: 8.955

6.  Transcranial Pulsed-Current Stimulation versus Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Patients with Disorders of Consciousness: A Pilot, Sham-Controlled Cross-Over Double-Blind Study.

Authors:  Alice Barra; Martin Rosenfelder; Sepehr Mortaheb; Manon Carrière; Geraldine Martens; Yelena G Bodien; Leon Morales-Quezada; Andreas Bender; Steven Laureys; Aurore Thibaut; Felipe Fregni
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2022-03-24

7.  The effects of direct current stimulation and random noise stimulation on attention networks.

Authors:  Alberto Lema; Sandra Carvalho; Felipe Fregni; Óscar F Gonçalves; Jorge Leite
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-18       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Effect of Transcranial Pulsed Current Stimulation on Fatigue Delay after Medium-Intensity Training.

Authors:  Qingchang Wu; Guoliang Fang; Jiexiu Zhao; Jian Liu
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-06-08       Impact factor: 4.614

9.  Effect of Theta Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation and Phase-Locked Transcranial Pulsed Current Stimulation on Learning and Cognitive Control.

Authors:  Farrokh Mansouri; Alaa Shanbour; Frank Mazza; Peter Fettes; José Zariffa; Jonathan Downar
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 4.677

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.