Literature DB >> 27765610

Neural signature of tDCS, tPCS and their combination: Comparing the effects on neural plasticity.

Aurore Thibaut1, Cristina Russo2, Leon Morales-Quezada3, Aura Hurtado-Puerto4, Alícia Deitos5, Steven Freedman6, Sandra Carvalho7, Felipe Fregni8.   

Abstract

Transcranial pulsed current stimulation (tPCS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) are two noninvasive neuromodulatory brain stimulation techniques whose effects on human brain and behavior have been studied individually. In the present study we aimed to quantify the effects of tDCS and tPCS, individually and in combination, on cortical activity, sensitivity and pain-related assessments in healthy individuals in order to understand their neurophysiological mechanisms and potential applications in clinical populations. A total of 48 healthy individuals participated in this randomized double blind sham controlled study. Participants were randomized to receive a single stimulation session of either: active or sham tPCS and active or sham tDCS. Quantitative electroencephalography (qEEG), sensitivity and pain assessments were used before and after each stimulation session. We observed that tPCS had a higher effect on power, as compared to tDCS, in several bandwidths on various cortical regions: the theta band in the parietal region (p=0.021), the alpha band in the temporal (p=0.009), parietal (p=0.0063), and occipital (p<0.0001) regions. We found that the combination of tPCS and tDCS significantly decreased power in the low beta bandwidth of the frontal (p=0.0006), central (p=0.0001), and occipital (p=0.0003) regions, when compared to sham stimulation. Additionally, tDCS significantly increased power in high beta over the temporal (p=0.0015) and parietal (p=0.0007) regions, as compared to sham. We found no effect on sensitivity or pain-related assessments. We concluded that tPCS and tDCS have different neurophysiological mechanisms, elicit distinct signatures, and that the combination of the two leads to no effect or a decrease on qEEG power. Further studies are required to examine the effects of these techniques on clinical populations in which EEG signatures have been found altered.
Copyright © 2016. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  EEG; Non-invasive brain stimulation; Top-down/bottom-up connectivity; tDCS; tPCS

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27765610      PMCID: PMC5541936          DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2016.10.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosci Lett        ISSN: 0304-3940            Impact factor:   3.046


  42 in total

1.  Prefrontal direct current stimulation modulates resting EEG and event-related potentials in healthy subjects: a standardized low resolution tomography (sLORETA) study.

Authors:  D Keeser; F Padberg; E Reisinger; O Pogarell; V Kirsch; U Palm; S Karch; H-J Möller; M A Nitsche; C Mulert
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-12-10       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Behavioral effects of transcranial pulsed current stimulation (tPCS): Speed-accuracy tradeoff in attention switching task.

Authors:  Leon Morales-Quezada; Jorge Leite; Sandra Carvalho; Laura Castillo-Saavedra; Camila Cosmo; Felipe Fregni
Journal:  Neurosci Res       Date:  2016-02-03       Impact factor: 3.304

Review 3.  Modelling non-invasive brain stimulation in cognitive neuroscience.

Authors:  Carlo Miniussi; Justin A Harris; Manuela Ruzzoli
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2013-07-01       Impact factor: 8.989

4.  Anodal transcranial pulsed current stimulation: A novel technique to enhance corticospinal excitability.

Authors:  Shapour Jaberzadeh; Andisheh Bastani; Maryam Zoghi
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-09-26       Impact factor: 3.708

5.  Beta-frequency EEG activity increased during transcranial direct current stimulation.

Authors:  Myeongseop Song; Yungjae Shin; Kyongsik Yun
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2014-12-17       Impact factor: 1.837

6.  Sustained excitability elevations induced by transcranial DC motor cortex stimulation in humans.

Authors:  M A Nitsche; W Paulus
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2001-11-27       Impact factor: 9.910

Review 7.  Coma and consciousness: paradigms (re)framed by neuroimaging.

Authors:  Steven Laureys; Nicholas D Schiff
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2011-12-27       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  A voxel-based analysis of FDG-PET in traumatic brain injury: regional metabolism and relationship between the thalamus and cortical areas.

Authors:  Javier García-Panach; Nuria Lull; Juan José Lull; Joan Ferri; Carlos Martínez; Pablo Sopena; Montserrat Robles; Javier Chirivella; Enrique Noé
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 5.269

Review 9.  Does anodal transcranial direct current stimulation modulate sensory perception and pain? A meta-analysis study.

Authors:  B Vaseghi; M Zoghi; S Jaberzadeh
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-02-04       Impact factor: 3.708

10.  tDCS and Robotics on Upper Limb Stroke Rehabilitation: Effect Modification by Stroke Duration and Type of Stroke.

Authors:  Sofia Straudi; Felipe Fregni; Carlotta Martinuzzi; Claudia Pavarelli; Stefano Salvioli; Nino Basaglia
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 3.411

View more
  7 in total

1.  Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation, Transcranial Pulsed Current Stimulation, and Their Combination on Brain Oscillations in Patients with Chronic Visceral Pain: A Pilot Crossover Randomized Controlled Study.

Authors:  Aurore Thibaut; Cristina Russo; Aura Maria Hurtado-Puerto; Jorge Leon Morales-Quezada; Alícia Deitos; John Christopher Petrozza; Steven Freedman; Felipe Fregni
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 4.003

2.  Bilateral Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Reshapes Resting-State Brain Networks: A Magnetoencephalography Assessment.

Authors:  Giovanni Pellegrino; Matteo Maran; Cristina Turco; Luca Weis; Giovanni Di Pino; Francesco Piccione; Giorgio Arcara
Journal:  Neural Plast       Date:  2018-01-11       Impact factor: 3.599

3.  Exploring the effects of anodal and cathodal high definition transcranial direct current stimulation targeting the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex.

Authors:  Wing Ting To; Justin Eroh; John Hart; Sven Vanneste
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-03-13       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Optimized Electrode Placements for Non-invasive Electrical Stimulation of the Olfactory Bulb and Olfactory Mucosa.

Authors:  Yusuf Ozgur Cakmak; Kamran Nazim; Chris Thomas; Abhishek Datta
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2020-11-12       Impact factor: 4.677

5.  The effect of combined transcranial pulsed current stimulation and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation on lower limb spasticity in children with spastic cerebral palsy: a randomized and controlled clinical study.

Authors:  Zhenhuan Liu; Shangsheng Dong; Sandra Zhong; Fang Huang; Chuntao Zhang; Yuan Zhou; Haorong Deng
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2021-03-24       Impact factor: 2.125

Review 6.  The Efficacy of Transcranial Current Stimulation Techniques to Modulate Resting-State EEG, to Affect Vigilance and to Promote Sleepiness.

Authors:  Ludovica Annarumma; Aurora D'Atri; Valentina Alfonsi; Luigi De Gennaro
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2018-07-20

7.  Dual-task interference is related to attentional level in healthy farmers: An observational study.

Authors:  Dabi Shin; Eun Kyoung Kang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-07-02       Impact factor: 1.817

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.