Literature DB >> 25477766

Distraction Effects of Smoking Cues in Antismoking Messages: Examining Resource Allocation to Message Processing as a Function of Smoking Cues and Argument Strength.

Sungkyoung Lee1, Joseph N Cappella1.   

Abstract

Findings from previous studies on smoking cues and argument strength in antismoking messages have shown that the presence of smoking cues undermines the persuasiveness of antismoking public service announcements (PSAs) with weak arguments. This study conceptualized smoking cues (i.e., scenes showing smoking-related objects and behaviors) as stimuli motivationally relevant to the former smoker population and examined how smoking cues influence former smokers' processing of antismoking PSAs. Specifically, by defining smoking cues and the strength of antismoking arguments in terms of resource allocation, this study examined former smokers' recognition accuracy, memory strength, and memory judgment of visual (i.e., scenes excluding smoking cues) and audio information from antismoking PSAs. In line with previous findings, the results of the study showed that the presence of smoking cues undermined former smokers' encoding of antismoking arguments, which includes the visual and audio information that compose the main content of antismoking messages.

Entities:  

Keywords:  argument strength; audio processing; memory; smoking cues; visual processing

Year:  2013        PMID: 25477766      PMCID: PMC4250969          DOI: 10.1080/15213269.2012.755454

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Media Psychol        ISSN: 1521-3269


  16 in total

1.  Activation in mesolimbic and visuospatial neural circuits elicited by smoking cues: evidence from functional magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Deborah L Due; Scott A Huettel; Warren G Hall; David C Rubin
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 18.112

2.  Comparing attentional bias to smoking cues in current smokers, former smokers, and non-smokers using a dot-probe task.

Authors:  Ronald N Ehrman; Steven J Robbins; Melissa A Bromwell; Megan E Lankford; John R Monterosso; Charles P O'Brien
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2002-07-01       Impact factor: 4.492

3.  Attentional and evaluative biases for smoking cues in nicotine dependence: component processes of biases in visual orienting.

Authors:  B Bradley; M Field; K Mogg; J De Houwer
Journal:  Behav Pharmacol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.293

4.  Impact of tobacco control policies and mass media campaigns on monthly adult smoking prevalence.

Authors:  Melanie A Wakefield; Sarah Durkin; Matthew J Spittal; Mohammad Siahpush; Michelle Scollo; Julie A Simpson; Simon Chapman; Victoria White; David Hill
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2008-06-12       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Smoking cues, argument strength, and perceived effectiveness of antismoking PSAs.

Authors:  Sungkyoung Lee; Joseph N Cappella; Caryn Lerman; Andrew A Strasser
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2011-01-24       Impact factor: 4.244

6.  Humor in the eye tracker: attention capture and distraction from context cues.

Authors:  Madelijn Strick; Rob W Holland; Rick Van Baaren; Ad Van Knippenberg
Journal:  J Gen Psychol       Date:  2010 Jan-Mar

7.  A Measure of Perceived Argument Strength: Reliability and Validity.

Authors:  Xiaoquan Zhao; Andrew Strasser; Joseph N Cappella; Caryn Lerman; Martin Fishbein
Journal:  Commun Methods Meas       Date:  2011-03-04

8.  Effects of cue exposure and deprivation on cognitive resources in smokers.

Authors:  M A Sayette; M R Hufford
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  1994-11

9.  Cue exposure treatment for smoking relapse prevention: a controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  R Niaura; D B Abrams; W G Shadel; D J Rohsenow; P M Monti; A D Sirota
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 6.526

10.  Eye movements to smoking-related pictures in smokers: relationship between attentional biases and implicit and explicit measures of stimulus valence.

Authors:  Karin Mogg; Brendan P Bradley; Matt Field; Jan De Houwer
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 6.526

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Perceived Message Effectiveness Meets the Requirements of a Reliable, Valid, and Efficient Measure of Persuasiveness.

Authors:  Joseph N Cappella
Journal:  J Commun       Date:  2018-08-28

2.  Countering Craving with Disgust Images: Examining Nicotine Withdrawn Smokers' Motivated Message Processing of Anti-Tobacco Public Service Announcements.

Authors:  Russell B Clayton; Glenn Leshner; Rachel L Tomko; Timothy J Trull; Thomas M Piasecki
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2017-02-19

3.  Effects of advertisements on smokers' interest in trying e-cigarettes: the roles of product comparison and visual cues.

Authors:  Jessica K Pepper; Sherry L Emery; Kurt M Ribisl; Brian G Southwell; Noel T Brewer
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 7.552

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.