Literature DB >> 25475901

Simulated colonoscopy training leads to improved performance during patient-based assessment.

Arjun D Koch1, Vivian E Ekkelenkamp1, Jelle Haringsma1, Erik J Schoon2, Robert A de Man1, Ernst J Kuipers1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Virtual reality (VR) endoscopy simulators are increasingly being used in the training of novice endoscopists. There are, however, insufficient data regarding the effect of simulator training on the early learning curve of novice endoscopists.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the clinical performance of novice endoscopists during colonoscopy after intensive and prolonged training on a VR endoscopy simulator.
DESIGN: Prospective study.
SETTING: Single university medical center. PATIENTS: Patient-based assessment (PBA) of performance was carried out on patients routinely scheduled for colonoscopy.
INTERVENTIONS: Eighteen trainees without any endoscopic experience were included in the study. They were divided into 2 groups. The simulator-training program consisted of either 50 (group I) or 100 (group II) VR colonoscopies. After 10, 30, and 50 (group I) and after 20, 60, and 100 (group II) VR colonoscopies, trainees underwent both simulator-based assessment and PBA. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Cecal intubation time, colonic insertion depth, and cecal intubation rate.
RESULTS: Eighteen novices participated in the study. All completed VR training and assessments. The mean cecal intubation time on the SBA decreased from a baseline of 9.50 minutes to 2.20 minutes at completion of the training (P = .002). Colonic insertion depth during PBA improved from 29.4 cm to 63.7 cm (P < .001). The learning effect of simulator training ceased after 60 colonoscopies. LIMITATIONS: Single-center study, no formal sample size calculation.
CONCLUSIONS: VR training by using a colonoscopy simulator leads to a significant improvement in performance with the simulator itself and, more importantly, to significantly improved performances during patient-based colonoscopy. This study demonstrates the rationale for intensive simulator training in the early learning curve of novices performing colonoscopy.
Copyright © 2015 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25475901     DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.09.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc        ISSN: 0016-5107            Impact factor:   9.427


  13 in total

1.  Endoscopy training in Canadian general surgery residency programs.

Authors:  Nori L Bradley; Amy Bazzerelli; Jenny Lim; Valerie Wu Chao Ying; Sarah Steigerwald; Matt Strickland
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 2.089

Review 2.  Training in Endoscopy.

Authors:  Keith Siau; Neil D Hawkes; Paul Dunckley
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-09

Review 3.  Quality Indicators in Colonoscopy.

Authors:  Kjetil Garborg; Thomas de Lange; Michael Bretthauer
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-09

4.  Less is more: creation and validation of a novel, affordable suturing simulator for anorectal surgery.

Authors:  S J Langenfeld; M A Fuglestad; K G Cologne; J S Thompson; C Are; S R Steele
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2019-11-11       Impact factor: 3.781

5.  Preclinical endoscopic training using a part-task simulator: learning curve assessment and determination of threshold score for advancement to clinical endoscopy.

Authors:  Pichamol Jirapinyo; Wasif M Abidi; Hiroyuki Aihara; Theodore Zaki; Cynthia Tsay; Avlin B Imaeda; Christopher C Thompson
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-02-22       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Virtual reality simulation training for health professions trainees in gastrointestinal endoscopy.

Authors:  Rishad Khan; Joanne Plahouras; Bradley C Johnston; Michael A Scaffidi; Samir C Grover; Catharine M Walsh
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-08-17

7.  A novel physical colonoscopy simulator based on analysis of data from computed tomography colonography.

Authors:  Katsuhisa Noda; Takatoshi Kitada; Yasumoto Suzuki; Hugh Shunsuke Colvin; Taishi Hata; Tsunekazu Mizushima
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2017-05-03       Impact factor: 2.549

8.  Face and construct validity of a novel mechanical ERCP simulator.

Authors:  Sophia E van der Wiel; Arjun D Koch; Marco J Bruno
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2018-06-05

Review 9.  Gaming science innovations to integrate health systems science into medical education and practice.

Authors:  Earla J White; Joy H Lewis; Lise McCoy
Journal:  Adv Med Educ Pract       Date:  2018-05-31

Review 10.  The impact of surgical simulation on patient outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Trym R Meling; Torstein R Meling
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2020-05-13       Impact factor: 3.042

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.