S J Langenfeld1, M A Fuglestad2, K G Cologne3, J S Thompson2, C Are2, S R Steele4. 1. Department of Surgery, University of Nebraska Medical Center, 620 S 42nd St and Emile St, Omaha, NE, 68198, USA. sean.langenfeld@unmc.edu. 2. Department of Surgery, University of Nebraska Medical Center, 620 S 42nd St and Emile St, Omaha, NE, 68198, USA. 3. Department of Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, 1975 Zonal Ave, Los Angeles, CA, 90033, USA. 4. Department of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Duty hour restrictions have increased the role of simulation in surgical education. A simulation that recreates the unique visual, anatomic, and ergonomic challenges of anorectal surgery has yet to be described. The aim of this study was to develop a low-cost, low-fidelity anorectal surgery simulator and provide validity evidence for the model. METHODS: A novel, low-fidelity simulator was constructed, and anorectal surgery workshops were implemented for general surgery interns at a single institution. Face and content validity were assessed with separate questionnaires using a 5-point Likert scale. Participants performed a simulated hemorrhoid excision with longitudinal wound closure, and transverse wound closure. Time-to-task completion and quality of suturing/knot tying were evaluated by a blinded observer to assess construct validity. RESULTS: Material cost was US $11 per simulator. We recruited 20 first-year surgery residents (novices) and 4 practicing colorectal surgeons (experts), and conducted 3 workshops in 2014-2016. All face and content validity measures achieved a median score greater than 4 (range 4.0-5.0). Time-to-task completion was significantly lower in the expert cohort (hemorrhoid excision with longitudinal wound closure: 195 vs. 477 s and transverse closure: 79 vs. 192 s, p < 0.001 for both). Suturing and knot-tying scores were significantly higher in the expert cohort for both tasks (p < 0.05 for all comparisons). CONCLUSIONS: Our low-fidelity, low-cost anorectal surgery model demonstrated evidence of face, content, and construct validity. We believe that this simulator could be a useful instrument in the education of junior surgical trainees and will allow residents to obtain proficiency in anorectal suturing tasks in conjunction with traditional surgical training.
BACKGROUND: Duty hour restrictions have increased the role of simulation in surgical education. A simulation that recreates the unique visual, anatomic, and ergonomic challenges of anorectal surgery has yet to be described. The aim of this study was to develop a low-cost, low-fidelity anorectal surgery simulator and provide validity evidence for the model. METHODS: A novel, low-fidelity simulator was constructed, and anorectal surgery workshops were implemented for general surgery interns at a single institution. Face and content validity were assessed with separate questionnaires using a 5-point Likert scale. Participants performed a simulated hemorrhoid excision with longitudinal wound closure, and transverse wound closure. Time-to-task completion and quality of suturing/knot tying were evaluated by a blinded observer to assess construct validity. RESULTS: Material cost was US $11 per simulator. We recruited 20 first-year surgery residents (novices) and 4 practicing colorectal surgeons (experts), and conducted 3 workshops in 2014-2016. All face and content validity measures achieved a median score greater than 4 (range 4.0-5.0). Time-to-task completion was significantly lower in the expert cohort (hemorrhoid excision with longitudinal wound closure: 195 vs. 477 s and transverse closure: 79 vs. 192 s, p < 0.001 for both). Suturing and knot-tying scores were significantly higher in the expert cohort for both tasks (p < 0.05 for all comparisons). CONCLUSIONS: Our low-fidelity, low-cost anorectal surgery model demonstrated evidence of face, content, and construct validity. We believe that this simulator could be a useful instrument in the education of junior surgical trainees and will allow residents to obtain proficiency in anorectal suturing tasks in conjunction with traditional surgical training.
Authors: Samuel I Schwartz; Joseph Galante; Amy Kaji; Matthew Dolich; David Easter; Marc L Melcher; Kevin Patel; Mark E Reeves; Ali Salim; Anthony J Senagore; Danny M Takanishi; Christian de Virgilio Journal: JAMA Surg Date: 2013-09 Impact factor: 14.766
Authors: Samer G Mattar; Adnan A Alseidi; Daniel B Jones; D Rohan Jeyarajah; Lee L Swanstrom; Ralph W Aye; Steven D Wexner; José M Martinez; Sharona B Ross; Michael M Awad; Morris E Franklin; Maurice E Arregui; Bruce D Schirmer; Rebecca M Minter Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2013-09 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Lena M Napolitano; Mark Savarise; Juan C Paramo; Laurel C Soot; S Rob Todd; Jay Gregory; Gary L Timmerman; William G Cioffi; Elisabeth Davis; Ajit K Sachdeva Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2014-02-06 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: Arjun D Koch; Vivian E Ekkelenkamp; Jelle Haringsma; Erik J Schoon; Robert A de Man; Ernst J Kuipers Journal: Gastrointest Endosc Date: 2014-12-02 Impact factor: 9.427
Authors: Ryan M Antiel; Darcy A Reed; Kyle J Van Arendonk; Sean C Wightman; Daniel E Hall; John R Porterfield; Karen D Horvath; Kyla P Terhune; John L Tarpley; David R Farley Journal: JAMA Surg Date: 2013-05 Impact factor: 14.766
Authors: Najma Ahmed; Katharine S Devitt; Itay Keshet; Jonathan Spicer; Kevin Imrie; Liane Feldman; Jonathan Cools-Lartigue; Ahmed Kayssi; Nir Lipsman; Maryam Elmi; Abhaya V Kulkarni; Chris Parshuram; Todd Mainprize; Richard J Warren; Paola Fata; M Sean Gorman; Stan Feinberg; James Rutka Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2014-06 Impact factor: 12.969