BACKGROUND: Interaction of proteins with other molecules plays an important role in many biological activities. As many structures of protein-DNA complexes and protein-RNA complexes have been determined in the past years, several databases have been constructed to provide structure data of the complexes. However, the information on the binding sites between proteins and nucleic acids is not readily available from the structure data since the data consists mostly of the three-dimensional coordinates of the atoms in the complexes. RESULTS: We analyzed the huge amount of structure data for the hydrogen bonding interactions between proteins and nucleic acids and developed a database called DBBP (DataBase of Binding Pairs in protein-nucleic acid interactions, http://bclab.inha.ac.kr/dbbp). DBBP contains 44,955 hydrogen bonds (H-bonds) of protein-DNA interactions and 77,947 H-bonds of protein-RNA interactions. CONCLUSIONS: Analysis of the huge amount of structure data of protein-nucleic acid complexes is labor-intensive, yet provides useful information for studying protein-nucleic acid interactions. DBBP provides the detailed information of hydrogen-bonding interactions between proteins and nucleic acids at various levels from the atomic level to the residue level. The binding information can be used as a valuable resource for developing a computational method aiming at predicting new binding sites in proteins or nucleic acids.
BACKGROUND: Interaction of proteins with other molecules plays an important role in many biological activities. As many structures of protein-DNA complexes and protein-RNA complexes have been determined in the past years, several databases have been constructed to provide structure data of the complexes. However, the information on the binding sites between proteins and nucleic acids is not readily available from the structure data since the data consists mostly of the three-dimensional coordinates of the atoms in the complexes. RESULTS: We analyzed the huge amount of structure data for the hydrogen bonding interactions between proteins and nucleic acids and developed a database called DBBP (DataBase of Binding Pairs in protein-nucleic acid interactions, http://bclab.inha.ac.kr/dbbp). DBBP contains 44,955 hydrogen bonds (H-bonds) of protein-DNA interactions and 77,947 H-bonds of protein-RNA interactions. CONCLUSIONS: Analysis of the huge amount of structure data of protein-nucleic acid complexes is labor-intensive, yet provides useful information for studying protein-nucleic acid interactions. DBBP provides the detailed information of hydrogen-bonding interactions between proteins and nucleic acids at various levels from the atomic level to the residue level. The binding information can be used as a valuable resource for developing a computational method aiming at predicting new binding sites in proteins or nucleic acids.
Protein-nucleic acid interactions play an important role in many biological activities. Site-specific DNA-binding proteins or transcription factors (TFs) play important roles in gene regulations by forming protein complexes [1]. These protein-DNA complexes may bind alone or in combination near the genes whose expression they control [2]. For example, DNA-binding proteins may regulate the expression of a target gene [1], so protein-DNA interactions are important for DNA replication, transcription and gene regulations in general.Protein-RNA interactions also have important roles in a wide variety of gene expression [3]. For instance, ribonucleoprotein particles (RNPs) bind to RNA in the post-transcriptional regulation of gene expression [4], and tRNAs bind to aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases to properly translate the genetic code into amino acids [5]. As protein and RNA mutually interact, RNA-binding proteins are essential molecules in degradation, localization, regulating RNA splicing, RNA metabolism, stability, translation, and transport [6]. Therefore, identification of amino acids involved in DNA/RNA binding or (ribo)nucleotides involved in amino acid binding is important for understanding of the mechanism of gene regulations.As the number of structures of protein-DNA/RNA complexes that have been resolved has been increased plentifully for the past few years, a huge amount of structure data is available at several databases [7-10]. However, the data on the binding sites between proteins and nucleic acids is not readily available from the structure data, which consist mostly of the three-dimensional coordinates of the atoms in the complexes. A recent database called the Protein-RNA Interface Database (PRIDB) [9] provides the information on protein-RNA interfaces by showing interacting amino acids and ribonucleotides in the primary sequences. However, it does not provide the binding sites on the interacting partners of the amino acids and ribonucleotides in protein-RNA interfaces.In this study we performed wide analysis of the structures of protein-DNA/RNA complexes and built a database called DBBP (DataBase of Binding Pairs in protein-nucleic acid interactions). The database shows hydrogen-bonding interactions between proteins and nucleic acids at an atomic level, which is not readily available in any other databases, including the Protein Data Bank (PDB) [11]. The binding pairs of hydrogen bonds provided by the database will help researchers determine DNA (or RNA) binding sites in proteins and protein binding sites in DNA or RNA molecules. It can also be used as a valuable resource for developing a computational method aiming at predicting new binding sites in proteins or nucleic acids. The rest of the paper presents the structure and interface of the database.
Materials and methods
Protein-DNA/RNA complexes
The protein-DNA/RNA complexes determined by X-ray crystallography were selected from PDB. As of February, 2013 there were 2,568 protein-DNA complexes and 1,355 protein-RNA complexes in PDB. After extracting complexes with a resolution of 3.0 Å or better, 2,138 protein-DNA complexes (called the DS1 data set) and 651 protein-RNA complexes (the DS2 data set) remained.
Binding sites in protein-nucleic acid interactions
Different studies [9,12-14] have defined slightly different criteria for a binding site in protein-nucleic acid interactions. For example, in RNABindR [15,16] and BindN [17] an amino acid with an atom within a distance of 5 Å from any other atom of a ribonucleotide was considered to be an RNA-binding amino acid.As for the criteria for a binding site between proteins and nucleic acids, we use a hydrogen bond (H-bond), which is stricter than the distance criteria. The locations of hydrogen atoms (H) were inferred from the surrounding atoms since hydrogen atoms are invisible in purely X-ray-derived structures. H-bonds between proteins and nucleic acids were identified by finding all proximal atom pairs between H-bond donors (D) and acceptors (A) that satisfy the following the geometric criteria: (1) the hydrogen-acceptor (H-A) distance <2.5 Å, (2) the donor-hydrogen-acceptor (D-H-A) angle >90°, (3) the contacts with the donor-acceptor (D-A) distance <3.9 Å, (4) H-A-AA angle >90°, where AA is an acceptor antecedent. These are the most commonly used criteria for H bonds. In particular, the criteria of H-A distance <2.5 Å and D-H-A angle >90° are essential for H bonds [18]. If there is no H-bond within a protein-nucleic acid complex, we eliminated the complex from the data sets of DS1 and DS2. As a result, we gathered 2,068 protein-DNA complexes (DS3) and 637 protein-RNA complexes (DS4).As an example, Figure 1 shows three H-bonds between Threonine (Thr224) and Cytosine (C8) in a protein-RNA complex (PDB ID: 4F3T) [19]. In protein-RNA interactions, OG1 and N of Threonine can act as a hydrogendonor and OG1 and O of Threonine can act as a hydrogen acceptor. N3, N4, O2′ and O3′ of Cytosine can act as a hydrogendonor and N3, O2, O2′, O3′, O4′, O5′, OP1 and OP2 of Cytosine can act as a hydrogen acceptor. In this example, Cytosine is the 8th nucleotide in RNA chain R and Threonine is the 224th amino acid in protein chain A. OG1 of Threonine donates hydrogen to O2′ of Cytosine, OG1 of Threonine donates hydrogen to O3′ of Cytosine, and O2' of Cytosine donates hydrogen to OG1 of Threonine. Figure 2 shows the structure of the protein-RNA complex (PDB ID: 4F3T).
Figure 1
Three H-bonds between Cytosine (C8) and Threonine (Thr224). Three H-bonds between Cytosine (C8) and Threonine (Thr224) of a protein-RNA complex (PDB ID: 4F3T). O2′ of Cytosine donates hydrogen to OG1 of Threonine. OG1 of Threonine donates hydrogen to O2′ of Cytosine and OG1 of Threonine donates hydrogen to O3′ of Cytosine.
Figure 2
The structure of a protein-RNA complex (PDB ID: 4F3T). The enlarged box shows three hydrogen bonds between Cytosine and Threonine. O2′ donates hydrogen to OG1. OG1 donates hydrogen to O2′ and O3′.
Three H-bonds between Cytosine (C8) and Threonine (Thr224). Three H-bonds between Cytosine (C8) and Threonine (Thr224) of a protein-RNA complex (PDB ID: 4F3T). O2′ of Cytosine donates hydrogen to OG1 of Threonine. OG1 of Threonine donates hydrogen to O2′ of Cytosine and OG1 of Threonine donates hydrogen to O3′ of Cytosine.The structure of a protein-RNA complex (PDB ID: 4F3T). The enlarged box shows three hydrogen bonds between Cytosine and Threonine. O2′ donates hydrogen to OG1. OG1 donates hydrogen to O2′ and O3′.
The probability of binding amino acid
Let P (+) be the probability that an amino acid is a binding site and P (−) be the probability that an amino acid is a non-binding site in protein-nucleic acid interactions (Equations 1 and 2).Then, the conditional probability P(A|+) is the probability that the binding amino acid is A. Likewise, the conditional probability P(A|−) is the probability that the non-binding amino acid is A. Equation 5 is the log-likelihood ratio of P(A|+) and P(A|−).
Results and discussion
Hydrogen bonds in protein-nucleic acid interactions
We obtained H-bonds from 2,068 protein-DNA complexes (DS3) and 637 protein-RNA complexes (DS4) using HBPLUS [18,20] with the H-bond criteria: , ∠DHA >90°, . There are a total of 44,955 H-bonds in protein-DNA complexes and 77,947 H-bonds in protein-RNA complexes. Table 1 shows the number of atoms, which are occurrences in H-bonds of amino acids. In the 44,955 H-bonds of protein-DNA complexes, there are 41,298 hydrogen donors and 3,657 hydrogen acceptors in amino acids. In the 77,947 H-bonds of protein-RNA complexes, there are 59,796 hydrogen donors and 18,151 hydrogen acceptors in amino acids. Table 2 shows the number of atoms, which are occurrences in H-bonds of (ribo)nucleotides. In the 44,955 H-bonds of protein-DNA complexes, there are 3,657 hydrogen donors and 41,298 hydrogen acceptors in DNAs. In the 77,947 H-bonds of protein-RNA complexes, there are 18,151 hydrogen donors and 59,796 hydrogen acceptors in RNAs.
Table 1
Atoms of amino acids involved in H-bonding interactions with nucleic acids.
RNA-protein complex
DNA-protein complex
AA
Atom
Acceptor
Donor
#H-bonds
Acceptor
Donor
#H-bonds
Ala
N
1,069
1,653
674
808
O
567
134
OXT
17
Arg
NH2
9,252
22,395
6,144
13,705
NH1
7,278
4,665
NE
4,011
2,191
N
1,388
606
O
455
99
OXT
13
Asn
ND2
3,268
4,953
2349
3,119
OD1
934
408
N
549
261
O
202
101
Asp
OD2
1,416
2,829
353
735
OD1
1,183
290
O
178
31
N
52
61
Cys
SG
23
76
125
19
120
215
O
24
N
2
76
Gln
NE2
168
2496
4,468
2
1,593
2,571
OE1
1,108
363
521
N
480
O
216
92
Glu
OE2
1,691
3,507
275
737
OE1
1,315
260
O
193
19
N
308
183
Gly
N
1,518
2,699
1749
1,902
O
1,175
153
OXT
6
His
NE2
412
1,454
3,591
30
768
1,254
ND1
536
1,014
15
327
N
106
90
O
69
24
Ile
N
258
309
433
466
O
40
33
OXT
11
Leu
N
507
766
362
387
O
259
25
Lys
NZ
9,864
5,145
6,351
N
852
11,436
86
1,120
O
717
OXT
3
Met
SD
105
662
15
147
O
276
13
119
N
278
OXT
3
Phe
O
333
539
42
247
N
206
205
Pro
O
161
161
28
28
Ser
OG
1,179
4,675
6,997
182
3,533
4,741
N
683
958
O
460
68
Thr
OG1
1,058
4,406
7,267
158
3,017
4,252
O
750
132
N
1,053
945
Trp
NE1
532
582
358
393
OXT
16
O
14
10
N
20
25
Tyr
OH
597
1,935
2,682
133
1,800
2,511
O
93
28
N
57
550
Val
O
174
326
36
386
N
151
350
OXT
1
18,151
59,796
77,947
3,657
41,298
44,955
Table 2
Atoms of nucleotides involved in H-bonding interactions with amino acids.
RNA-protein complex
DNA-protein complex
Nucleotide
Atom
Acceptor
Donor
#H-bonds
Acceptor
Donor
#H-bonds
A
N1
402
140
22,103
58
23
10,254
N3
1,071
79
748
26
N6
1,472
621
N7
505
580
O2'
4,240
4,269
O3'
1,711
86
361
100
O4'
252
276
O5'
110
188
OP1
1,754
4,039
OP2
6,012
3,234
C
N3
335
49
16,189
127
3
9,502
N4
785
1,272
O2
2,556
959
O2'
2,101
2,209
1
1
O3'
1,150
56
257
139
O4'
663
209
O5'
117
118
OP1
5,176
3,858
OP2
992
2,558
G
N1
547
759
30,350
2
204
14,864
N2
3,907
761
N3
655
53
399
2
N7
1,660
2,238
O2'
2,047
2,383
O3'
1,031
24
438
157
O4'
450
420
O5'
585
197
O6
2,396
2,272
OP1
10,523
4,359
OP2
3,330
3,415
U/T
N3
173
386
9,305
29
234
10,335
O2
1,561
1,165
O2'
1,310
1,445
O3'
1,067
49
351
114
O4
1,199
796
O4'
166
257
O5'
45
216
OP1
1,108
3,548
OP2
796
3,625
59,796
18,151
77,947
41,298
3,657
44,955
Atoms of amino acids involved in H-bonding interactions with nucleic acids.Atoms of nucleotides involved in H-bonding interactions with amino acids.If an atom of DNA acts as a hydrogen acceptor, an atom of protein should be a hydrogendonor. Hence, the number of DNA acceptors (41,298) is the same as the number of protein donors (41,298), and the number of DNA donors (3,657) is the same as the number of protein acceptors (3,657). Likewise, the number of RNA acceptors (59,796) is the same as the number of protein donors (59,796) and the number of RNA donors (18,151) is the same as the number of protein acceptors (18,151).Figure 3 shows RNA-binding amino acids in protein-RNA complexes. Ala, Arg, Glu, Gly, Leu, Lys, and Val are more frequent than others in protein-RNA complexes (Figure 3A). In binding sites with RNA, Arg has the most frequently observed amino acid. Figure 3C shows the log-likelihood ratio (Equation 5) for each amino acid. Amino acids with a positive log-likelihood ratio have a higher chance to bind to RNA than those with a negative log-likelihood ratio. Arg has the highest log-likelihood ratio (1.59), and Val has the lowest log-likelihood ratio (-4.24). Interestingly, Ala has a negative log-likelihood ratio although it is frequently observed in protein-RNA complexes. This is because Ala is rarely observed in binding sites.
Figure 3
RNA-binding amino acids in protein-RNA complexes. (A) Amino acids in the protein-RNA complexes and RNA-binding amino acids. (B) The probability that the binding amino acid is A (P(A|+)) and the probability that non-binding amino acid is A (P(A|−)). (C) The log-likelihood ratio log2(P(A|+)/P(A|−)).
RNA-binding amino acids in protein-RNA complexes. (A) Amino acids in the protein-RNA complexes and RNA-binding amino acids. (B) The probability that the binding amino acid is A (P(A|+)) and the probability that non-binding amino acid is A (P(A|−)). (C) The log-likelihood ratio log2(P(A|+)/P(A|−)).Figure 4 shows DNA-binding amino acids in protein-DNA complexes. Ala, Arg, Glu, Gly, Leu, Lys, Ser, and Val are more frequent than others in protein-DNA complexes (Figure 4A). As in protein-RNA interactions, Arg has the most frequently observed amino acid in the binding sites with DNA.
Figure 4
DNA-binding amino acids in protein-DNA complexes. (A) Amino acids in the protein-DNA complexes and DNA-binding amino acids. (B) The probability that the binding amino acid is A (P(A|+)) and the probability that non-binding amino acid is A (P(A|−)). (C) The log-likelihood ratio log2(P(A|+)/P(A|−)).
DNA-binding amino acids in protein-DNA complexes. (A) Amino acids in the protein-DNA complexes and DNA-binding amino acids. (B) The probability that the binding amino acid is A (P(A|+)) and the probability that non-binding amino acid is A (P(A|−)). (C) The log-likelihood ratio log2(P(A|+)/P(A|−)).
Web interface
DBBP shows binding pairs at various levels, from the atomic level to the residue level. When it shows detailed information on H-Bonds, it shows the donors and acceptors of each H-bond. A same type of atom can play a role of hydrogendonor or acceptor depending on the context. We generated XML files for binding sites of protein-DNA/RNA complexes. Users of the database can access the XML file via PDB ID.Figure 5 shows our XML schema. The BindPartner element has elements and attributes, which are PDB ID, protein sequence (proSeq), protein bond (proBnd), DNA/RNA sequence (dnaSeq, rnaSeq), and DNA/RNA bond (dnaBnd, rnaBnd). DNA/RNA and protein bonds represent binding site '+' and non-binding site '-'. The BindingSite element has attributes, which are PDBID, Acceptor, Acceptor chain, Acceptor index, Acceptor residue, Donor, Donor chain, Donor index, and Donor residue.
Figure 5
The XML schema of the database. XML files were generated for the binding sites in protein-DNA complexes and protein-RNA complexes via the XML schema.
The XML schema of the database. XML files were generated for the binding sites in protein-DNA complexes and protein-RNA complexes via the XML schema.
Conclusion
From an extensive analysis of the structure data of protein-DNA/RNA complexes extracted from PDB, we have identified hydrogen bonds (H-bonds). Analysis of the large amount of structure data for H-bonds is labor-intensive, yet provides useful information for studying protein-nucleic acid interactions. The protein-DNA complexes contain 44,955 H-bonds, which have 3,657 hydrogen acceptors (HA) and 41,298 hydrogen donors (HD) in amino acids, and 41,298 HA and 3,657 HD in nucleotides. The protein-RNA complexes contain 77,947 H-bonds, which have 18,151 HA and 59,796 HD in amino acids, and 59,796 HA and 18,151 HD in nucleotides. Using the data of H-bonding interactions, we developed a database called DBBP (DataBase of Binding Pairs in protein-nucleic acid interactions). DBBP provides the detailed information of H-bonding interactions between proteins and nucleic acids at various levels. Such information is not readily available in any other databases, including PDB, but will help researchers determine DNA (or RNA) binding sites in proteins and protein binding sites in DNA or RNA molecules. It can also be used as a valuable resource for developing a computational method aiming at predicting new binding sites in proteins or nucleic acids. The database is available at http://bclab.inha.ac.kr/dbbp.
Authors' contributions
Byungkyu Park implemented the databse and prepared the first draft of the manuscript. Hyungchan Kim drew figures and prepared the manuscript together. Kyungsook Han supervised the work and rewrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Authors: H M Berman; J Westbrook; Z Feng; G Gilliland; T N Bhat; H Weissig; I N Shindyalov; P E Bourne Journal: Nucleic Acids Res Date: 2000-01-01 Impact factor: 16.971
Authors: Michael M Hoffman; Maksim A Khrapov; J Colin Cox; Jianchao Yao; Lingnan Tong; Andrew D Ellington Journal: Nucleic Acids Res Date: 2004-01-01 Impact factor: 16.971
Authors: Michael Terribilini; Jeffry D Sander; Jae-Hyung Lee; Peter Zaback; Robert L Jernigan; Vasant Honavar; Drena Dobbs Journal: Nucleic Acids Res Date: 2007-05-05 Impact factor: 16.971
Authors: Donny D Licatalosi; Aldo Mele; John J Fak; Jernej Ule; Melis Kayikci; Sung Wook Chi; Tyson A Clark; Anthony C Schweitzer; John E Blume; Xuning Wang; Jennifer C Darnell; Robert B Darnell Journal: Nature Date: 2008-11-02 Impact factor: 49.962