| Literature DB >> 25473630 |
Ashraf Kazemi1, Fatemeh Ramezanzadeh2, Mohammad Hosein Nasr-Esfahani3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: High dietary fat consumption may alter oocyte development and embryonic development. This prospective study was conducted to determine the relation between dietary fat consumption level, its food sources and the assisted reproduction parameters.Entities:
Keywords: Assisted reproduction; Dietary fats; Embryo quality; Pregnancy rate
Year: 2014 PMID: 25473630 PMCID: PMC4227979
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Reprod Infertil ISSN: 2228-5482
Results of multiple regression analysis adjusted for age, physical activity, BMI and etiology of infertility
| Variables | Standardized Coefficient | 95% Confidence Interval | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
| Beta | Lower | Upper | |
|
| |||
| Total fat (g/d) | 12.5 | 0.18 | 25.1 |
| Total fat (cal%) | 10.37 | -11.8 | 32.6 |
| Sat. FA (g/d) | 0.15 | -11.2 | 11.5 |
| Trans FA (g/d) | -0.15 | -0.59 | 0.29 |
| PUFA (g/d) | -1.76 | -13.6 | 10.1 |
| MUFA (g/d) | -6.71 | -19.7 | 6.3 |
| meat (g/w) | 0.17 | -1.65 | 1.97 |
| Dairy (g/w) | -3.23 | -6.61 | 0.16 |
| Sausage & ham (g/w) | -1.1 | -2.08 | -.03 |
| Oil (g/w) | 0.44 | -4.19 | 5.08 |
|
| |||
| Total fat (g/d) | 37.62 | -2.39 | 77.62 |
| Total fat (cal%) | -15.4 | -84.1 | 53.41 |
| Sat. FA (g/d) | 31.71 | -3.5 | 66.88 |
| Trans FA (g/d) | -0.91 | -0.49 | 0.31 |
| PUFA (g/d) | -34.2 | -70.8 | 2.5 |
| MUFA (g/d) | -26.1 | -66.4 | 14.14 |
| meat (g/w) | 3.51 | -1.34 | 8.36 |
| Dairy (g/w) | 1.31 | -9.79 | 12.4 |
| Sausage & ham (g/w) | -4.9 | -11 | -3.58 |
| Oil (g/w) | -5.9 | -18.2 | -4.34 |
|
| |||
| Total fat (g/d) | 33.16 | -19.8 | 86.11 |
| Total fat (cal%) | 29.79 | -61.2 | 120.8 |
| Sat. FA (g/d) | 21.19 | -25.4 | 67.74 |
| Trans FA (g/d) | 0.61 | -0.91 | 2.13 |
| PUFA (g/d) | -66 | -115 | -18.2 |
| MUFA (g/d) | 14.92 | -38.4 | 68.22 |
| meat (g/w) | 3.99 | -3.16 | 11.14 |
| Dairy (g/w) | 2.83 | -12.6 | 18.21 |
| Sausage & ham (g/w) | -1.51 | -9.87 | 6.84 |
| Oil (g/w) | -21 | -39.6 | -2.85 |
|
| |||
| Total fat (g/d) | -0.30 | -0.55 | -0.01 |
| Total fat (cal%) | -0.82 | -1.4 | -0.22 |
| Sat. FA (g/d) | 0.04 | -0.1 | 0.17 |
| Trans FA | 0.47 | -1.12 | 2.05 |
| PUFA (g/d) | -0.26 | -0.49 | -0.01 |
| MUFA (g/d) | -0.22 | -0.51 | 0.07 |
| meat (g/w) | 0.04 | -0.03 | 0.11 |
| Dairy (g/w) | -0.07 | -0.06 | 1.02 |
| Sausage & ham (g/w) | -0.01 | -0.09 | 0.08 |
| Oil (g/w) | -0.14 | -0.32 | 0.04 |
p<0.05
p<0.01
Comparison of assisted reproduction parameters between groups of calorie intake as fat
| Calorie Intake as Fat | ≤35 (n=182) | >35 (n=54) |
|---|---|---|
|
| ||
| Mean±SD | ||
|
| 11.25±8.69 | 11.52±10.61 |
|
| 79.74±27.43 | 75.51±28.1 |
|
| 62.82±29.79 | 61.79±31.21 |
|
| 72.96±36.36 | 66.61±5.09 |
|
| 51.11±2.85 | 33.43±37.43 |
|
| 30.79% | 34.54% |
p<0.01