| Literature DB >> 32258992 |
Lauren A Fowler1,2, Lacey N Dennis-Cornelius2, John A Dawson1,3, Robert J Barry2, James L Davis2, Mickie L Powell1,2, Yuan Yuan2, Michael B Williams2, Robert Makowsky4, Louis R D'Abramo2, Stephen A Watts1,2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Controversial findings have been reported in human and animal studies regarding the influence of n-6 (ω-6) to n-3 (ω-3) fatty acid ratios on obesity and health. Two confounding factors may be related to interactions with other dietary lipid components or sex-specific differences in fatty acid metabolism.Entities:
Keywords: body composition; diet-induced obesity; dietary lipid composition; reproductive health; zebrafish
Year: 2020 PMID: 32258992 PMCID: PMC7108797 DOI: 10.1093/cdn/nzaa034
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Curr Dev Nutr ISSN: 2475-2991
Experimental water quality conditions for each recirculating system
| Recirculating system | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Parameter | Target range | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
| pH | 6.80–8.50 | 7.45 ± 0.01 | 7.40 ± 0.01 | 7.39 ± 0.01 | 7.40 ± 0.01 |
| Conductivity, mS/cm | 1.40–1.50 | 1.42 ± 0.01 | 1.50 ± 0.01 | 1.52 ± 0.01 | 1.49 ± 0.01 |
| Salinity, ppt | 0.60–0.70 | 0.69 ± 0.003 | 0.70 ± 0.003 | 0.70 ± 0.004 | 0.70 ± 0.003 |
| Temperature,°C | 27–28 | 27.4 ± 0.02 | 27.2 ± 0.02 | 27.2 ± 0.02 | 27.9 ± 0.03 |
| TAN, mg/L | ∼ 0 | 0.01 ± 0.01 | 0.03 ± 0.03 | 0.01 ± 0.01 | 0.01 ± 0.01 |
| Nitrite, mg/L | ∼ 0 | 0.19 ± 0.08 | 0.33 ± 0.09 | 0.36 ± 0.07 | 0.22 ± 0.08 |
| Nitrate, mg/L | < 200 | 101 ± 1.25 | 100 ± 0 | 100 ± 0 | 100 ± 0 |
| Alkalinity, mg/L CaCO3 | 50–150 | 50–52 | 50–52 | 50–52 | 50–52 |
Values are mean ± SEM obtained over the course of the experiment. mS, milliSiemens; ppt, parts per thousand; TAN, total ammonia nitrogen.
Sample sizes of male and female zebrafish evaluated for outcomes in growth and body composition, by dietary lipid component and individual diets
| Wet body mass, | Total body length, | Total lipid mass, | TG mass, | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| M | F | M | F | M | F | M | F | |
| TDL (g/kg) | ||||||||
| 80 | 239 | 370 | 234 | 353 | 35 | 36 | 32 | 28 |
| 110 | 238 | 369 | 232 | 363 | 32 | 33 | 32 | 33 |
| 140 | 222 | 356 | 217 | 352 | 35 | 36 | 28 | 28 |
| RFA | ||||||||
| 1.4:1 | 206 | 396 | 197 | 385 | 34 | 35 | 27 | 28 |
| 4:1 | 261 | 345 | 257 | 341 | 34 | 36 | 34 | 36 |
| 9.5:1 | 232 | 354 | 229 | 342 | 35 | 34 | 31 | 30 |
| Individual diet | ||||||||
| 80 g/kg TDL | ||||||||
| 1.4:1 | 69 | 126 | 66 | 119 | 12 | 12 | 9 | 9 |
| 5:1 | 92 | 117 | 91 | 116 | 11 | 12 | 11 | 12 |
| 9.5:1 | 78 | 127 | 77 | 118 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 12 |
| 110 g/kg TDL | ||||||||
| 1.4:1 | 70 | 138 | 66 | 137 | 10 | 11 | 10 | 11 |
| 5:1 | 89 | 120 | 87 | 118 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 12 |
| 9.5:1 | 79 | 111 | 79 | 108 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 |
| 140 g/kg TDL | ||||||||
| 1.4:1 | 67 | 132 | 65 | 129 | 12 | 12 | 8 | 8 |
| 5:1 | 80 | 108 | 79 | 107 | 11 | 12 | 11 | 12 |
| 9.5:1 | 75 | 116 | 73 | 116 | 12 | 12 | 9 | 8 |
RFA, dietary ratio of n–6 to n–3 fatty acids; TDL, total dietary lipid; TG, triglyceride.
FIGURE 1Main and interactive effects of TDL and RFA on terminal body mass and body composition in male and female zebrafish. Contour plots: (A) male body mass; (B) female body mass; (C) male total lipid mass; and (D) female total lipid mass. Table values represent parameter estimates from regression analysis. *,**Significant change from reference group (80 g/kg TDL or 1.4/1 RFA): *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01. NS, P > 0.05. adj., adjusted; RFA, ratio of n–6 to n–3 fatty acids; TDL, total dietary lipid.
Terminal triglyceride mass content of male and female zebrafish by dietary lipid component
| Percentage of dry body mass | ||
|---|---|---|
| Male | Female | |
| Total dietary lipid (g/kg) | ||
| 80 (reference) | 9.92 ± 0.625 | 9.87 ± 0.856 |
| 110 | 11.2 ± 0.869 | 12.11 ± 0.876 |
| 140 | 9.87 ± 0.608 | 11.7 ± 0.741 |
| Dietary ratio of n–6 to n–3 fatty acids | ||
| 1.4:1 (reference) | 11.9 ± 0.804 | 12.3 ± 0.971 |
| 5:1 | 10.8 ± 0.660 | 11.5 ± 0.852 |
| 9.5:1 | 8.51 ± 0.596** | 9.75 ± 0.645 |
Values are percentage mean ± SEM and represent measures obtained at termination of the 16-wk feeding trial. Differences were evaluated with additive effects regression and analyzed separately in males and females. **Different from the reference group (P < 0.01) within each dietary lipid component. NS, P > 0.05.
Spawning success of female zebrafish by dietary lipid component and week
| Successful/total breeding events | Proportion successful | Estimate |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total dietary lipid (g/kg) | ||||
| 80 (reference) | 72/96 | 0.75 | ||
| 110 | 67/96 | 0.70 | −0.22 (0.33) | 0.51 |
| 140 | 57/96 | 0.59 | −0.70 (0.32) | 0.030 |
| Dietary ratio of n–6 to n–3 fatty acids | ||||
| 1.4:1 (reference) | 75/96 | 0.78 | ||
| 5:1 | 61/96 | 0.64 | −0.69 (0.33) | 0.038 |
| 9.5:1 | 60/96 | 0.63 | −0.74 (0.33) | 0.026 |
| Week | ||||
| 1 (reference) | 39/72 | 0.54 | ||
| 2 | 51/72 | 0.71 | 0.82 (0.36) | 0.024 |
| 3 | 50/72 | 0.69 | 0.68 (0.36) | 0.06 |
| 4 | 53/72 | 0.74 | 0.97 (0.37) | 0.009 |
Assessed over a 4-wk breeding period following termination of the 16-wk feeding trial. Successful events = female released eggs; n = 32 total breeding events per diet.
Estimates are from the logistic component of zero-inflated negative binomial regression analysis and represent probability of a successful spawn relative to the reference group within each predictor variable. Significant P values (P < 0.05) represent differences from the reference group.
FIGURE 2Effects of total dietary lipid and ratio of n–6 to n–3 fatty acids on reproductive success in female zebrafish. (A, C) Boxplots for total egg production. (B, D) Boxplots for embryo viability (ratio of viable eggs/total eggs produced). Data are from successful breeding events and represent counts from individual events. Boxes represent the IQR of values (bottom, lower quartile/25th percentile; center bar, median value/50th percentile; top, upper quartile/75th percentile). Upper/lower whiskers signify values within 1.5 IQR of the upper/lower quartiles. Outliers (closed circles) and mean values (diamond markers) are also shown on plots. Differences from the reference group within each dietary lipid component were evaluated with zero-inflated regression analysis. ***Different from 1.4:1 ratio, P < 0.001. NS, P > 0.05.