Literature DB >> 11789772

Transthoracic esophagectomy with radical mediastinal and abdominal lymph node dissection and cervical esophagogastrostomy for esophageal carcinoma.

S J Swanson1, H F Batirel, R Bueno, M T Jaklitsch, J M Lukanich, E Allred, S J Mentzer, D J Sugarbaker.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Several techniques for esophageal resection have been reported. This study examines the morbidity, mortality, and early survival of patients after transthoracic esophagectomy for esophageal carcinoma using current staging techniques and neoadjuvant therapy. The technique includes right thoracotomy, laparotomy, and cervical esophagogastrostomy (total thoracic esophagectomy) with radical mediastinal and abdominal lymph node dissection.
METHODS: Three hundred forty-two patients had surgery for esophageal carcinoma between 1989 and 2000 at our institution. Two hundred fifty consecutive patients had esophagectomy using this technique. Kaplan-Meier curves and univariate and multivariate analyses were performed by postsurgical pathologic stage.
RESULTS: Median age was 62.7 years (31 to 86 years). Fifty-nine were female. Eighty-one percent (202) had induction chemotherapy (all patients with clinical T3/4 or N1). Early postoperative complications included recurrent laryngeal nerve injury (14% [35]), chylothorax (9%, [22]), and leak (8%, [19]). Median length of stay was 13 days (5 to 330 days). In-hospital or 30-day mortality was 3.6% (9). Overall survival at 3 years was 44%; median survival was 25 months, and 3-year survival by posttreatment pathologic stage was: stage 0 (complete response) (n = 60), 56%; stage I (n = 32), 65%; stage IIA (n = 67), 41%; stage IIB (n = 30), 46%; and stage III (n = 49), 17%. Mean follow-up was 24 months (SEM 1.6, 0 to 138 months). Five patients with tumor in situ, 6 patients with stage IV disease, and 1 patient who could not be staged (12 pts) were excluded from survival and multivariate calculations. In univariate and different models of multivariate analysis, age more than 65 years, posttreatment T3, and nodal involvement were predictive of poor survival. For univariate analysis, p = 0.002, p = 0.004, p = 0.02, respectively; for multivariate analysis, p = 0.001, p = 0.003, p = 0.02, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Total thoracic esophagectomy with node dissection for esophageal cancer appears to have acceptable morbidity and mortality with encouraging survival results in the setting of neoadjuvant therapy. Patients who show complete response after induction chemoradiotherapy appear to have improved long-term survival.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11789772     DOI: 10.1016/s0003-4975(01)03203-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  52 in total

1.  Outcomes after minimally invasive esophagectomy: review of over 1000 patients.

Authors:  James D Luketich; Arjun Pennathur; Omar Awais; Ryan M Levy; Samuel Keeley; Manisha Shende; Neil A Christie; Benny Weksler; Rodney J Landreneau; Ghulam Abbas; Matthew J Schuchert; Katie S Nason
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 2.  Multimodality therapy for gastroesophageal cancers.

Authors:  Kenneth K Wang
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2002 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Anatomical basis of the risk of injury to the right laryngeal recurrent nerve during thoracic surgery.

Authors:  Vincent Benouaich; Jean Porterie; Ourdia Bouali; Jacques Moscovici; Raphaël Lopez
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2012-02-25       Impact factor: 1.246

4.  Initial clinical outcomes after completion of training in a Canadian Royal College thoracic surgery program.

Authors:  Steven Milman; Thomas Ng
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 2.089

5.  Traveling to a High-volume Center is Associated With Improved Survival for Patients With Esophageal Cancer.

Authors:  Paul J Speicher; Brian R Englum; Asvin M Ganapathi; Xiaofei Wang; Matthew G Hartwig; Thomas A D'Amico; Mark F Berry
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Clinical application of mucosal valve technique for anastomosis during esophagogastrostomy.

Authors:  Bin Li; Yu-Min Li; Jian-Hua Zhang; Yun-Feng Su; Cheng Wang; Zhi-Qiang Wang; Yun-Jiu Gou; Tie-Niu Song; Jian-Bao Yang
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2013-10-18       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  Results of a multimodal therapy in patients with stage IV Barrett's adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Matthias Schauer; Hubert Stein; Florian Lordick; Marcus Feith; Joerg Theisen; Joerg Ruediger Siewert
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Minimally invasive transhiatal esophagectomy: lessons learned.

Authors:  Grant Sanders; Frederic Borie; Emanuel Husson; Pierre Marie Blanc; Gianluca Di Mauro; Christiano Claus; Bertrand Millat
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-05-04       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Impact of Positive Margins on Survival in Patients Undergoing Esophagogastrectomy for Esophageal Cancer.

Authors:  Jeffrey Javidfar; Paul J Speicher; Matthew G Hartwig; Thomas A D'Amico; Mark F Berry
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2015-11-11       Impact factor: 4.330

10.  Clinicopathologic characteristics of esophagectomy for esophageal carcinoma in elderly patients.

Authors:  Jian-Yang Ma; Zhu Wu; Yun Wang; Yong-Fan Zhao; Lun-Xu Liu; Ying-Li Kou; Qing-Hua Zhou
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-02-28       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.