| Literature DB >> 25470412 |
Sergii Yakunin1, Dmitry N Dirin, Loredana Protesescu, Mykhailo Sytnyk, Sajjad Tollabimazraehno, Markus Humer, Florian Hackl, Thomas Fromherz, Maryna I Bodnarchuk, Maksym V Kovalenko, Wolfgang Heiss.
Abstract
Highly photoconductive thin films of inorganic-capped PbS nanocrystal quantum dots (QDs) are reported. Stable colloidal dispersions of (NH4)3AsS3-capped PbS QDs were processed by a conventional dip-coating technique into a thin homogeneous film of electronically coupled PbS QDs. Upon drying at 130 °C, (NH4)3AsS3 capping ligands were converted into a thin layer of As2S3, acting as an infrared-transparent semiconducting glue. Photodetectors obtained by depositing such films onto glass substrates with interdigitate electrode structures feature extremely high light responsivity and detectivity with values of more than 200 A/W and 1.2×10(13) Jones, respectively, at infrared wavelengths up to 1400 nm. Importantly, these devices were fabricated and tested under ambient atmosphere. Using a set of time-resolved optoelectronic experiments, the important role played by the carrier trap states, presumably localized on the arsenic-sulfide surface coating, has been elucidated. Foremost, these traps enable a very high photoconductive gain of at least 200. The trap state density as a function of energy has been plotted from the frequency dependence of the photoinduced absorption (PIA), whereas the distribution of lifetimes of these traps was recovered from PIA and photoconductivity (PC) phase spectra. These trap states also have an important impact on carrier dynamics, which led us to propose a kinetic model for trap state filling that consistently describes the experimental photoconductivity transients at various intensities of excitation light. This model also provides realistic values for the photoconductive gain and thus may serve as a useful tool to describe photoconductivity in nanocrystal-based solids.Entities:
Keywords: inorganic ligands; lead sulfide; nanocrystals; photodetectors; trap states
Year: 2014 PMID: 25470412 PMCID: PMC4278417 DOI: 10.1021/nn5067478
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ACS Nano ISSN: 1936-0851 Impact factor: 15.881
Figure 1Photodetector preparation and characteristics. (a) Absorption spectra of a DMSO solution (black) and 20 layer thick film (red) of PbS NCs capped with AsS33– ligands. The inset shows a model sketch of a PbS NC with attached AsS33– ligand groups. (b) TEM image of a monolayer of PbS NCs capped with As2S3. (c) SEM cross-sectional image of a 20 layer PbS/As2S3 film, deposited on glass substrate for photoconductivity measurement. The inset shows a sketch of the substrate with an interdigitated gold electrode, covered by a PbS/As2S3film. (d) Responsivity (black) and product of EQE and gain (red) spectra for a 20 layer PbS/As2S3 film. The arrow indicates the excitonic peak for which the detectivity value is given. The inset shows the IV characteristics of the same sample.
Figure 2Modulated photoconductivity experiments. (a) Responsivity (black) and detectivity (red) measured at a wavelength of 1300 nm as a function of modulation frequency. (b) PC transients at a wavelength of 1300 nm, for light pulses durations in between 50 μs and 50 ms.
Figure 3Carrier dynamics. (a) Time resolved fluorescence traces of oleate-capped PbS NCs (black) and As2S3-capped PbS NCs (red). The portion of the PL spectrum used for the time-resolved experiment is shaded in the PL spectrum, shown in the inset. Pump–probe trace for PbS/AsS33– film recorded with a probe at 1440 nm. Black points, experiment data; red curve, exponential fit. Inset: PIA spectrum of a PbS/As2S3 film. The red point indicates the probe-wavelength from the transient experiment.
Figure 4Trap states: distribution and lifetimes. (a,b) PIA amplitude and phase spectra, measured at two light modulation frequencies (80 Hz, black; 20 kHz, red). The difference between these spectra shown in green corresponds to the slow component of the PIA and represents the product of trap density distribution N(λ) and light absorption cross-section σ(λ). (c) From (b) and eq the electron trap state escape time distribution is calculated (green). The same time evaluated from the PC response phase of Figure S9 is given in blue. The dashed line represents eq , and the same data are shown on Figure S10 on a Arrhenius plot. The lifetime deduced from the pump–probe experiment, red point, fits well to the prediction of eq .
Figure 5Carrier dynamics model and fit to experiment. (a) Sketch of energy diagram where the arrows describe light absorption A, electron trapping (time constant τ ∼ 500 ps) and escape (arrows with time constant τ 0.1 ms to 0.5 s) from trap states with different binding energies. (b) Photoconductivity decay transients after light pulses with various durations. The symbols are the experimental data from Figure b, whereas the lines are fits obtained with eq .