Colloidal semiconductor nanocrystals (NCs) are widely studied as building blocks for novel solid-state materials. Inorganic surface functionalization, used to displace native organic capping ligands from NC surfaces, has been a major enabler of electronic solid-state devices based on colloidal NCs. At the same time, very little is known about the atomistic details of the organic-to-inorganic ligand exchange and binding motifs at the NC surface, severely limiting further progress in designing all-inorganic NCs and NC solids. Taking thiostannates (K4SnS4, K4Sn2S6, K6Sn2S7) as typical examples of chalcogenidometallate ligands and oleate-capped CdSe NCs as a model NC system, in this study we address these questions through the combined application of solution (1)H NMR spectroscopy, solution and solid-state (119)Sn NMR spectroscopy, far-infrared and X-ray absorption spectroscopies, elemental analysis, and by DFT modeling. We show that through the X-type oleate-to-thiostannate ligand exchange, CdSe NCs retain their Cd-rich stoichiometry, with a stoichiometric CdSe core and surface Cd adatoms serving as binding sites for terminal S atoms of the thiostannates ligands, leading to all-inorganic (CdSe)core[Cdm(Sn2S7)yK(6y-2m)]shell (taking Sn2S7(6-) ligand as an example). Thiostannates SnS4(4-) and Sn2S7(6-) retain (distorted) tetrahedral SnS4 geometry upon binding to NC surface. At the same time, experiments and simulations point to lower stability of Sn2S6(4-) (and SnS3(2-)) in most solvents and its lower adaptability to the NC surface caused by rigid Sn2S2 rings.
Colloidal semiconductor nanocrystals (NCs) are widely studied as building blocks for novel solid-state materials. Inorganic surface functionalization, used to displace native organic capping ligands from NC surfaces, has been a major enabler of electronic solid-state devices based on colloidal NCs. At the same time, very little is known about the atomistic details of the organic-to-inorganic ligand exchange and binding motifs at the NC surface, severely limiting further progress in designing all-inorganic NCs and NC solids. Taking thiostannates (K4SnS4, K4Sn2S6, K6Sn2S7) as typical examples of chalcogenidometallate ligands and oleate-capped CdSe NCs as a model NC system, in this study we address these questions through the combined application of solution (1)H NMR spectroscopy, solution and solid-state (119)Sn NMR spectroscopy, far-infrared and X-ray absorption spectroscopies, elemental analysis, and by DFT modeling. We show that through the X-type oleate-to-thiostannate ligand exchange, CdSe NCs retain their Cd-rich stoichiometry, with a stoichiometric CdSe core and surface Cd adatoms serving as binding sites for terminal S atoms of the thiostannates ligands, leading to all-inorganic (CdSe)core[Cdm(Sn2S7)yK(6y-2m)]shell (taking Sn2S7(6-) ligand as an example). Thiostannates SnS4(4-) and Sn2S7(6-) retain (distorted) tetrahedral SnS4 geometry upon binding to NC surface. At the same time, experiments and simulations point to lower stability of Sn2S6(4-) (and SnS3(2-)) in most solvents and its lower adaptability to the NC surface caused by rigid Sn2S2 rings.
In a nonvacuum environment, metal ions and atoms do not exist in
a completely isolable form but in a solvated or ligand-coordinated
state. Similarly, inorganic nanoparticles or nanocrystals (NCs, crystalline
nanoparticles) require a shell of capping molecules, also known as
ligands, to ensure their chemical and colloidal stability. Proper
selection of organic surface capping ligands, such as long-chain organic
molecules with a metal binding functional headgroup, has enabled the
development of monodisperse colloidal NCs since the early 1990s.[1] Capping ligands also largely dictate the individual
physical and chemical properties of NCs, as well as the collective
electronic properties in the densely packed NC solids.[1a,2] Owing to the highly insulating character of commonly used long-chain
capping ligands, novel chemistries based on short-chain and conductive
ligands, organic or inorganic, were required for demonstration of
NC-based solar cells,[3] light-emitting diodes,[4] photodetectors,[5] thermoelectrics,[6] transistors,[5c,7] and integrated
electronic circuits.[8] In this regard, colloidally
stable, all-inorganic NCs are readily obtained by solution-phase exchange
of organic ligands with common inorganic anions such as metal chalcogenide
complexes (MCCs, also known as chalcogenidometallates),[9] metal-free ions (S2–, HS–, Se2–, OH–, SCN–, I–, etc.),[7,8b,10] oxo- and polyoxometallates,[11] and metal halide complexes (halometallates).[10c,12] In addition, a powerful and complementary methodology is the formation
of cationic and naked, but colloidally stable, NCs upon controlled
stripping of the strongly bound native organic ligands with the simultaneous
coordination of metal cations on the NC surface with weakly nucleophilic
ligands.[13]Overall, the inorganic
surface functionalization of semiconductor
NCs has been the major enabler of NC-based electronic and optoelectronic
devices in the last 5 years. Thus far, particularly efficient inorganic
ligands, in terms of the speed of ligand-exchange (LE) reactions,
affinity to and compatibility with various NCs, have been MCCs due
to the high affinity of terminal chalcogen atoms to undercoordinated
metal atoms on the NC surface. In highly polar solvents, such as water
or methylformamide (MFA), these NCs are electrostatically stabilized
due to adsorption of anionic ligands onto the NC surface and electrostatic
dissociation of the counterions. Not only are the integrity and size-tunable
optical properties of NCs fully preserved, but also the charge transport
in the solids comprising such all-inorganic NCs is greatly improved,
and electronic mobilities of 5–35 cm2 V–1 s–1 are now routinely obtained.[7,8,14] Additionally, these all-inorganic colloids
of semiconductor NCs have enabled photodetectors with detectivities
of up to 1013 Jones,[15] improved
electrocatalytic properties of CdSe NCs (hydrogen evolution),[16] and enhanced electronic transport in NC-based
Li-ion batteries.[17] Inorganic-capped NCs
have also served as fully inorganic inks for solution-deposited CuInS2, Cu(In1–Ga)Se2, Cu2ZnSn(S,Se)4 (CZTS), and PbS phases as thin-film absorbers for photovoltaics,[18] ionically conductive composites of Ag2S NCs embedded into a GeS2 matrix,[19] or Sb2Te3-based nanocomposites for
thermoelectrics;[6a,6d] for integration of highly luminescent
PbS/CdS NCs into fully inorganic infrared-transparent matrices;[20] and for design of NC-in-glass windows with electrochemically
tunable transmittance.[11a,21] Solution-phase or solid-state
preparation of NCs with either partial or full surface coverage by
halide ions has also been reported by several groups.[22] Halide ion ligands provide improved electronic passivation
of semiconductor NCs, high oxidative stability, and power conversion
efficiencies of up to 8.6% in PbS NC-based photovoltaics.[23]The aforementioned superior electrical
characteristics of the solids
composed of inorganically capped NCs have stimulated this study. Here,
we aim to better understand the underlying chemistry of the organic-to-inorganic
LE and to unveil the atomistic ligand bonding motifs. Contrary to
very successful recent studies on the atomistic details of organic
ligand capping,[22f,22h,24] so far no systematic and direct spectroscopic studies, and atomistic
simulations of the inorganic surface capping and LE reactions with
complex ions such as chalcogenidometalates, have been reported. The
completeness of the removal of initial organic ligands as well as
the presence of smaller, inorganic capping species was mainly judged
from indirect observations such as diminishing of the C–H stretching
modes in FTIR spectra, solubility in polar solvents and electrophoretic
mobility measurements, elemental analysis, increased electronic coupling,
and decreased interparticle spacing in NC solids. These techniques,
however, do not provide direct information about the chemical identity
of the surface-bound species and do not probe local binding motifs
at the NC surface. Only one recent direct spectroscopic study had
dealt with smaller thiocyanate-ligands and confirmed the formation
of chemical bonds between inorganic ligands and the NC surface (FTIR
spectra of the metal- inorganic ligand bonds at the surface).[10d] In contrast with thiocyanates, MCC ligands
have a higher affinity for NC surfaces and are capable of multidentate
bonding. The lack of knowledge about the mechanism of the LE reactions
with MCCs and other inorganic ligands hinders the rational design
of new materials and our ability to further tune their electronic
and optical characteristics.An atomically precise image of
the NC surface is not yet available,
nor are the NCs surfaces atomically precise and static. Faceting,
surface reconstructions, and the dynamic nature of these phenomena
complicate the task.[24] Furthermore, the
techniques that are used to determine the atomic coordinates in crystalline
inorganic materials are inherently blind to the surfaces (e.g., X-ray
or electron diffraction). Therefore, building the atomistic picture
of ligand-capped NCs requires a powerful combination of modern experimental
tools and atomistic modeling. In this study, several experimental
techniques (nuclear magnetic resonance, X-ray absorption, Raman and
far-infrared spectroscopies, and elemental analysis) were combined
with atomistic simulations at density functional theory level (DFT)
in order to understand the LE reactions involving carboxylate-capped
CdSe NCs and thiostannate ligands (Sn2S64–, Sn2S76–,
SnS44–). Our study has concentrated on
these air-stable, sulfide-based ligands to minimize the effects caused
by the degradation of the ligands. The majority of results concern
Sn–S MCCs, due to high suitability of the 119Sn
isotope for solution and solid-state NMR studies and because we also
wanted to shed light onto the solution-based equilibria between several
Sn–S ligands. In particular, 119Sn solution NMR
spectroscopy allowed us to identify the ligands and their equilibria
in various solvents, while 119Sn solid-state NMR provides
insight into their surface-bound state. CdSe NCs serve as a convenient
model NC system due to extensive prior work on their synthesis, surface
chemistry, and photophysics. In particular, carboxylate-capped CdSe
NCs were previously shown to consist of a stoichiometric CdSe core
covered with a layer of Cd(O2CR)2.[22f−22h] Thus, an important question specific to LE with MCCs is whether
carboxylate is replaced as an anionic moiety (X-type exchange) or
is detached as molecular complex Cd(O2CR)2.The key findings of this study are as follows. First, we identify
the presence of Sn2S76– ions
and their role as a predominant form of thiostannate in N-methylformamide (MFA). Second, the LE reaction with all studied
thiostannate and other MCC ligands retains the Cd-rich stoichiometry
of CdSe NC surface, with a purely X-type displacement of the initial
oleate ligand. This study also compares relative binding strengths
of MCC ligands and simple S2– ions, including several
MCCs that had not been used as capping ligands before (GeS44–, SbS43–, and Sn2S76–). Thiostannate ligands SnS44–, Sn2S64–, and Sn2S76– convert into
each other upon dissolution in various solvents, pointing to the importance
of solution equilibra. Thiostannate ions largely maintain a tetrahedral
SnS4 motif after the binding to the NC surface. The multidentate
nature of MCCs allows a broad spectrum of binding modes. Atomistic
simulations support this observation and suggest polydentate binding
of SnS44– and Sn2S76– ions as most plausible forms of Sn–S
adsorbates on CdSe NC surfaces. Finally, atomistic simulations also
corroborate previously reported optical and charge transport measurements,
showing the key role played by the ligand in quenching the photoluminescence
and for stable n-type doping. Knowledge obtained for CdSe–thiostannate
system may shed light onto behavior of other technologically important
NC–MCC systems.
CdSe NCs were
synthesized following
the established procedure.[25] For preparing
the cadmium myristate precursor, cadmium nitrate solution in MeOH
(5 mmol/50 mL) was added dropwise into Na myristate solution (obtained
by dissolving 15 mmol NaOH and 15 mmol myristic acid in 500 mL of
methanol). The resulting white precipitate was washed with methanol
three times, and then dried at 70 °C. In a typical synthesis
of CdSe NCs, cadmium myristate (1.132 g) and SeO2 (0.222
g) were mixed with dried ODE (128 mL) in a 500 mL three-neck flask
and heated to 240 °C at a rate of 20 °C/min (the solution
has dried for 30 min at 100 C). After 3 min at 240 °C, 2 mL of
dried oleic acid was injected, and the solution was cooled to ca.
140 °C, followed by the removal of ODE via vacuum distillation.
After 30 min, when ca. 20 mL of ODE was left in the flask, the solution
was cooled down to RT and CdSe NCs were washed 3 times with hexane
and ethanol. After this purification step, CdSe NCs were redispersed
in hexane and used for further experiments. For comparison, we also
replaced Cd myristate by Cd oleate and obtained identical results
in terms of particle size and chemical composition. The cadmium oleate
precursor was prepared by mixing 0.250 g of CdO (2 mmol) and 6 mL
of OA in 128 mL of ODE, heating to 240 °C until the mixture become
colorless, followed by cooling to 100 °C, and drying under vacuum
for 1 h.
Synthesis of Inorganic Ligands
SnS2 was
prepared according to ref (9a). (N2H5)4Sn2S6 was obtained by dissolving elemental tin (118.7 mg,
1 mmol) in 3 mL of 1 M S/N2H4 solution and 1
mL of N2H4 upon stirring at ca. 100 °C
for 3 days forming a slightly yellow solution. K4SnS4 was obtained by combining K2S (0.22 g, 2 mmol)
and SnS2 (0.183 g 1 mmol) in 4 mL of water (stirring for
4 h at RT). Afterward, the solution was filtered, and white K4SnS4 was isolated by adding acetone (40 mL), followed
by 3 rinses with acetone and vacuum-drying. All other chalcogenidometallates
were isolated and dried in the same manner. K4Sn2S6 was obtained in a similar manner to K4SnS4; however, the quantity of K2S was adjusted (0.11
g, 1 mmmol). K6Sn2S7 cannot be obtained
in aqueous solution; however, it can be obtained in MFA by combining
stoichiometric amounts of SnS2 and K2S or by
dissolving K4SnS4 in MFA. K3AsS4 was prepared by combining As2S5 (0.310
g, 1 mmol) and K2S (0.33 g, 3 mmol) and 10 mL of H2O at room temperature. K3SbS4 was prepared
by dissolution Sb2S3 (0.339 g, 1 mmol) in a
solution containing K2S (0.33 g, 3 mmol) and S (0.064 g,
2 mmol) in 10 mL of H2O at RT. K4GeS4 was prepared by dissolving GeS (0.104 g, 1 mmol), in a solution
containing K2S (0.27g, 2.5 mmol), S (0.064 g, 2 mmol) in
10 mL of H2O at 50 °C.
Organic-to-Inorganic Ligand
Exchange
In a typical procedure,
50 mg of K4SnS4 (or K4Sn2S6, K2S, K3AsS4, K3SbS4, K4GeS4) was dissolved
in 10 mL of FA or MFA and mixed with 10 mL of hexane solution of oleate-capped
CdSe NCs (ca. 50 mg). The mixture was vigorously stirred for 30 min
until the hexane phase became colorless and all NCs migrated into
polar solvent. The hexane layer was carefully removed, and the polar
phase was rinsed 3 times with pure hexane, and then filtered through
a 0.2-μm filter. CdSe NCs were precipitated with a minimal amount
of MeCN. For more efficient precipitation, MeCN can be mixed with
a small amount of toluene (e.g., 10:1 ratio). For elemental analysis,
NCs were redispersed in MFA and precipitated once again with MeCN.
Analogous ligand exchange reactions were conducted with other solvents:
H2O (K4SnS4) and N2H4 (for the (N2H5)4Sn2S6 ligand). In the case of N2H4,
all steps were carried out in a glovebox. Ligand removal with Et3OBF4 was carried out according to known procedure,[13b] and stabilization with (NH4)SCN
was performed according to the established procedure.[10d]
Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) Spectroscopy
Liquid
state 119Sn NMR spectra were recorded at 186.5 MHz using
a Bruker 500 MHz DRX spectrometer. Spectra were obtained at room temperature
without deuterium locking of the main magnetic field. The pulse width
was set at 10 μs, and the relaxation delay was 0.5 s. The number
of scans used for experiments was 4800. The NMR samples were prepared
in 5 mm tube in glovebox/air using high purity solvents (C ∼
0.05 M). All 119Sn chemical shifts were referenced to Sn(CH3)4. The latter, sealed in a capillary, was also
used as an internal standard for accurate normalization of all spectra
enabling the quantification of the amounts of absorbed thoistannates.
Liquid state 1H NMR spectra were recorded using Bruker
250 and 300 MHz spectrometers. Spectra were obtained at room temperature
with locking of the main magnetic field. The pulse width was set at
11.5 μs, and the relaxation delay was 2 s. The number of scans
used for experiments was 32. The NMR samples were prepared in 5 mm
tubes using C6D6 or DMSO-d6 as solvents. All spectra were referenced to tetramethylsilane.
Solid-state CPMG[26] (Car–Purcel–Meiboom–Gill;
CPMG is a spin echo pulse sequence consisting of 90° radio frequency
pulse followed by an echo train induced by successive 180° pulses)
MAS 119Sn spectra of dry powdered materials were acquired
on a 700 MHz spectrometer (ν0(119Sn) =
261.06 MHz) with a 2.5 mm double resonance probe at reduced temperature
(250 K). Sample spinning rates of 25 kHz were employed. For the crystalline
materials 119Sn NMR spectra could be acquired in reasonably
short experiment times. However, the 119Sn longitudinal
relaxation times were very long as signal could only be observed with
lengthy recycle delays (>60 s). CPMG spectra are shown in their
echo
reconstructed form. They were obtained by summing the whole echoes
of the FIDs in the time domain, followed by Fourier transform and
application of a first order phase correction.[26]119Sn chemical shifts were referenced to Sn(CH3)4.
X-ray Absorption Spectroscopy
This
was carried out
at the X10DA (Super XAS) beamline at the Swiss Light Source, Villigen,
Switzerland, which operated with a ring current of approximately 400
mA in top-up mode. The polychromatic radiation from a superbend magnet,
with a magnetic field of 2.9 T and critical energy of 11.9 keV, was
monochromatized using a channel cut Si(311) crystal monochromator.
Spectra were collected on pressed pellets optimized to 1 absorption
length at the Sn K-edge (29 200.1 eV) in transmission mode.
For absolute energy calibration, the absorption of a Sb foil was measured
simultaneously between the second ionization chamber and third ionization
chamber. All 30 cm long ionization chambers were filled with Ar. Spectra
were normalized using Athena,[27] and EXAFS
spectra were fitted using FEFF[28] interface
Artemis.[27] Fourier transformation of the
background-subtracted EXAFS spectra was carried out in a k-range from 3 to 12 Å–1, with a δk of 1. Fitting of the EXAFS data was realized using scattering
path obtained from theoretical standards for Na4SnS4, Na4Sn2S6, Na6Sn2S7. The Sn–S coordination shell was
fitted first, in a range from 1 to 2.6 Å, without constraining
the fitting parameters (amplitude reduced factor s02, energy shift E0, bond distances Δr, Debye–Waller factor
σ2). The amplitude reduction factors were calibrated
first for the free ligands (coordination number fixed at 4). Then,
for the second shell, CN, E0, and Δr were fixed at their best value, and the fit range was
extended to 4 Å in order to determine the parameters for the
second shell. Cd atoms were introduced into the existing paths by
replacing the Na atoms. The scattering path of the second shell Sn–Cd
was added to the fits with its own set of s02 and Δr. Fitting of both shells
provided a single energy shift and Debye–Waller factor valid
for both shells, as well as amplitude reduced factor and bond distances
for each shell.
(ICP-OES) was carried out using commercial ICP-OES
spectrometer (Spectro
Arcos, SPECTRO Analytical Instruments GmbH, Kleve, Germany). Experimental
conditions for all measurements were the same and are summarized in Supporting Information Table S1. Every sample
was measured 3 or 5 times, and the average result is reported. Samples
were prepared by microwave-assisted digestion in a closed container
of the dried materials in a mixture of 3 mL of HNO3, 3
mL of HCl, and 0.5 mL of H2O2. Mn was used to
control the digestion recovery. Element quantification was carried
out by external calibration.
Other Characterization
UV–vis
absorption spectra
for colloidal solutions were collected using a Jasco V670 spectrometer
in transmission mode. Attenuated total reflectance-Fourier-transform
infrared spectra (ATR-FTIR, in mid-IR and far-IR spectral regions)
were recorded using Thermo Scientific Nicolet 6700 FT-IR spectrometer.
Powdered samples were deposited onto Si substrates, turned upside
down, and pressed against the diamond ATR crystal. For quantifying
the removal of initial organic ligands, FTIR spectra were calibrated
with internal standard KCN added to the sample (CN stretches are well
separated from CH). Liquid samples were measured by placing a small
droplet directly onto ATR crystal. Raman spectra were recorded with
a Renishaw inVia Raman microscope. Samples were run with a 785 nm
laser, with 64 × 2 s scans at 2 mW power.
Calculation of the Ligand
Surface Coverage
The wavelength
of the 1Se–2Sh1/2 transition maximum
was used to determine the mean NC diameter.[29] From the NC size, the number of CdSe units per crystals was calculated,
assuming a spherical shape and the molar volume of bulk cadmium selenide.
The concentration of the NCs, the ratio of ligands per nanocrystal,
and the ligand surface density assuming spherical shape were calculated
from the number of CdSe units per NCs, the molar concentration of
CdSe, and ligands in solutions.
DFT Simulations
Calculations were carried out using
the Quickstep module of the CP2K program suite.[30] CP2K is freely available from http://www.cp2k.org/ and utilizes a dual basis of localized Gaussians and plane waves.[31] The plane wave cutoff was 300 Ry, appropriate
for the Goedecker–Teter–Hutter pseudopotentials[32] that we employed, and the localized basis set
of double-ζ plus polarization (DZVP) quality optimized to reduce
the basis set superposition errors.[33] Calculations
were performed using the Perdew–Burke–Ernzerhof (PBE)
exchange correlation functional. Simulations were performed with nonperiodic
boundary conditions in a 50 × 50 × 50 Å3 unit cell for 2.5 and 3 nm NC sizes. The NC core was carved out
of bulk zinc blende CdSe. All single-bonded atoms were discarded,
resulting in a faceted cuboctahedron shape. Cd-rich (100) facets with
two dangling bonds per atom were passivated with ligands, whereas
(111) facets with one dangling bond per atom were left intact and
facet passivation was achieved by adding surface vacancies, as described
previously.[24] Chlorine was used for simplicity
as a ligand electronically similar to oleate, except for calculation
of oleate binding energy where it was taken explicitly. Care was taken
to select the stoichiometry that preserves the charge neutrality of
the dot, necessary to position the Fermi level in the midgap.[34] In case of MCC adsorption, the ligand was added
together with potassium counterions in the amount required to maintain
the charge neutrality. All geometries were initially propagated through
a molecular dynamics simulation of at least 1 ps and then relaxed
until forces on atoms reduced below 40 meV/Å. Optimized geometries
and full input files for simulations are provided in Supporting Information.
It is known that carboxylate
ligands can be fully exchanged with
MCC ligands,[9,23c] but details of this process
are lacking. As shown by Owen et al.,[22f] carboxylate (oleate, myristate, etc.) can be removed as an anionic
(X-type) RCO2– moiety or as a Cd(O2CR)2 molecule, depending upon the type of incoming
ligand (anionic or neutral molecule). Furthermore, the atomic structure
of inorganic MCC ligands in solution at the NC surface and their bonding
motifs at the NC surface are poorly understood. We have chosen ∼3.5
nm carboxylate-terminated zinc blende (zb) CdSe NCs[25] as a model system for studying the LE reactions with MCC
ligands. According to the detailed surface chemistry study by Owen
and co-workers,[22f] the structure of carboxylate-capped
CdSe NCs can be represented with the formula (CdSe)[Cd(O2CR)2], where carboxylate surface coverage is 1.5–4 carboxylates/nm2, depending upon the purification procedure and nature and
quantity of solvents and surfactants used. Hence the overall NC stoichiometry
is Cd-rich. No other ligands such as neutral molecules of phosphines
or amines (L-type ligands) were involved in the preparation of such
CdSe NCs, thus providing a well-defined and simple starting material
for LE reactions. We began our study by addressing the initial key
question about the actual mass-balance during the LE reaction with
MCCs.
Schematics of the Organic-to-Inorganic Ligand Exchange on the
Surface
of CdSe NCs Showing the Formation of Fully Inorganic Composition (1)
That Retains All Cd Atoms
The second possible
pathway
corresponds to loss of molecular Cd-oleate and was not observed in
this study.
Fate of Oleate and the
Mass Balance of the LE Reaction
The organic-to-inorganic
LE was carried out via a phase-transfer
reaction (Scheme 1). The initially carboxylate
capped CdSe NCs migrate from the nonpolar phase (hexane) to a polar
phase (MFA or N2H4) upon LE due to the change
from a hydrophobic surface functionality (with steric stabilization)
to a hydrophilic surface functionality (electrostatic stabilization).
Note that this is the first time that several of these MCCs have been
used as capping ligands (K6Sn2S7,
K4GeS4, K3SbS4). For comparison,
LE reactions were also performed with a metal-free S2– ligand and with Et3OBF4 (Meerwein’s
salt).[13b] To the best of our knowledge,
MFA has the highest known static dielectric constant (ε = 176)
for solvents; therefore, MFA enables the efficient dissociation of
cations, leading to stable colloidal solutions. In order to remove
any unbound ligands following LE, the NCs are precipitated from the
MFA phase by adding a minimal amount of nonsolvent (usually MeCN).
The nonsolvent and its quantity are chosen such that the free ligands
remain soluble in the solvent/nonsolvent mixture. The LE reaction
mass-balance was estimated by quantitative elemental analysis (ICP-OES, Supporting Information Tables S1 and S2), ATR-FTIR,
and 1H and 119Sn NMR spectroscopies of all phases:
initial oleate-capped NCs, precipitated thiostannate-capped NCs, and
hexane and MFA phases collected after phase-separation, including
all supernatants. For ICP-OES analysis, all dried residues were acid
digested using standard procedures. Results are detailed below.
Scheme 1
Schematics of the Organic-to-Inorganic Ligand Exchange on the
Surface
of CdSe NCs Showing the Formation of Fully Inorganic Composition (1)
That Retains All Cd Atoms
The second possible
pathway
corresponds to loss of molecular Cd-oleate and was not observed in
this study.
As expected from the formula (CdSe)[Cd(O2CR)2], the initial
oleate capped 3.5 nm spherical NCs are Cd-rich, and a Cd:Se atomic
ratio of 1.22 was determined by ICP-OES analysis. In all cases ATR-FTIR,
and NMR spectra indicate removal of at least 99.9% of the initial
oleate ligands from the NC surface following LE (Supporting Information Figures S1 and S2). Figure 1 shows the optical absorption spectra of the NCs
capped with the initial oleate ligand and capped with various MCCs,
sulfide ions, or weakly bound BF4– ions.
The excitonic absorption peak of the MCC and sulfide capped CdSe NCs
exhibit only small red shifts (1–11 nm) and a blue shift of
∼11 nm, respectively, in comparison to the excitonic absorption
peak of the initial oleate capped NCs. This suggests that there are
only small differences in the radius of the particles following LE
with these inorganic ligands. On the other hand, LE with Et3OBF4 leads to a noticeable ∼25 nm blue shift of
the excitonic absorption peak (Figure 1) and
a Se-rich stoichiometry of the NCs (Supporting
Information Table S2). This blue shift corresponds to decrease
of NC diameter by ca. 0.5 nm (a Cd–Se bond is ca. 0.2–0.3 nm long, depending upon the crystallographic direction)
or ca. 35% reduction in volume (from 22.4 to 14.2 nm3).
Presumably, Et3OBF4 removes not only the oleate
capping ligands, but also an excessive monolayer of Cd atoms as a
highly soluble Cd(BF4)2 salt. Another characteristic
effect of LE is the disappearance of the second absorption peak (2Sh2/3–1Se) in all inorganic capped NC samples.
A similar effect has also been observed by Owen et al.[22f] and by others in studies dealing with LE reactions
with organic ligands.[35] Nondiscrete separation
between the 1Sh2/3 and 2Sh2/3 hole levels is
most plausibly explained by heterogeneity of the surface hole states
due to increased stoichiometric (e.g, incorporation of S) and structural
surface irregularities.[36]
Figure 1
Absorption spectra of
∼3.5 nm CdSe NCs capped with initial
oleate ligands and, after ligand exchange, with various chalcogenidometallate
complexes, sulfide ions, or weakly bound BF4– ions.
Absorption spectra of
∼3.5 nm CdSe NCs capped with initial
oleate ligands and, after ligand exchange, with various chalcogenidometallate
complexes, sulfide ions, or weakly bound BF4– ions.ICP-OES elemental analysis indicates
that all MCC capped NCs retain
a Cd-rich stoichiometry, with Cd:Se ratios of 1.15–1.30 (Supporting Information Table S2). Increased Cd
stoichiometries may be caused by partial anion exchange of Se-to-S
at the NC surface. ICP-OES analysis of the hexane phase following
LE shows that less than 1% of Cd remained in the hexane phase. Upon
precipitation and separation of NCs, less than 0.1% of Cd can be found
in MFA. Consequently, no more than 5% of the Cd from the initial Cd(O2CR)2 ligand shell is detached from the NC surface
during the LE reactions with MCCs and sulfide as ligands. Somewhat
contrary to the common notion that long-chain organic ligands should
remain in the nonpolar phase, 1H solution NMR spectra indicate
no residual oleate-anions in hexane phase after LE, but rather large
amount of potassium oleate in the MFA phase following LE (Supporting Information Figure S3, vinylic hydrogens
at δ = 5.1–6.1 ppm were monitored). Quantitatively, the
amount of potassium oleate corresponds to ca. 2 carboxylates/nm2 of the initial CdSe NCs, consistent with the density of 1.5–4
carboxylates/nm2 reported by Owen et al.[22f] The amount of incoming MCC ligands varies from 0.65 to
2 MCC ligands/nm2. Taken together, ICP-OES and 1H NMR experiments on NCs and supernatant solutions provide strong
evidence for the formation of the all-inorganic MCC-capped CdSe NCs
with the composition expressed with formula 1 in Scheme 1. This implies the purely X-type ligand-exchange and the formation
of Cd–S bonds at the NC/MCCs interface.
Solution Phase Behavior
of Sn–S MCCs and Their Adsorption
onto NC Surface
Sn2S64– and SnS44– anions were introduced by
Krebs[37] and later studied by Kanatzidis,[38] Dehnen,[39] and others.
These ions are very convenient for solution NMR studies due to good
sensitivity of (natural abundance) 119Sn NMR, with spin
of 1/2 leading to narrow NMR peaks. Thiostannate
anions often interconvert depending upon the solvent or pH, while
their isotropic chemical shifts (δ(119Sn)) are well-documented
and rather weakly solvent or counterion dependent.[39a] δ(119Sn) values of all thiostannate anions
fall in relatively narrow range 49–74 ppm indicating that the
tetrahedral environment for 119Sn nuclei is maintained,
whereas the change in coordination number by 1 would lead to ca. 150
ppm change in chemical shift. No SnS32– anions were observed in our solution NMR studies.[40] No other Sn species, such as tin-oxosulfide ions, were
detected by NMR spectroscopy (from −1000 to 1000 ppm). SnTe44– ions differ from thiostannate ions in
that they contain more polarizable Te atoms, and therefore, their 119Sn chemical shifts are highly variable due to solvation
or ion-pairing effects and are generally observed between −1675
and −1825 ppm.[41] Furthermore, Se-
and Te-based stannates are much more sensitive to oxygen. For these
reasons, we concentrated our solution NMR studies exclusively on thiostannate
ions.Before studying the LE reaction with solution NMR spectroscopy,
we studied the actual species existing in solutions of these thiostannate
compounds in nonaqueous solvents commonly used in LE reactions. K4SnS4 and K4Sn2S6 can be prepared in water by combining SnS2 with the correct
molar proportions of K2S. Figure 2 shows the effect of the solvent, as observed by solution 119Sn NMR, upon dissolution of the pure substances K4SnS4 and K4Sn2S6. The most interesting
observation is the appearance of highly charged Sn2S76– ions as the predominant ion in MFA solutions
upon dissolving K4SnS4. An analogous NMR spectrum
is obtained by combining SnS2 and K2S directly
in MFA. Na6Sn2S7 has been previously
obtained by solid-state synthesis by Krebs et al.[37a] and characterized with solid-state NMR spectra by Mundus
et al.[42] A clear spectroscopic signature
that distinguishes Sn2S76– from Sn2S64– is the presence
(in good agreement with natural abundances of 117Sn nuclei)
of weaker satellite peaks caused by heteronuclear two bond 119Sn–S–117Sn spin–spin coupling. The 2J(119Sn, 117Sn) coupling
constant in K6Sn2S7 is 349.4 Hz which
is in good agreement with literature.[43] In the rigid Sn2S64– this
coupling seems to be absent or much weaker, possibly due to poorer
S-orbital overlap caused by the rigid conformation of Sn2S2 ring.[40] A lack of coupling
could also occur because of a dynamic process such as equilibria between
two kinds of thiostannate ions or if the Sn–S bridging bonds
are labile.
Figure 2
General scheme for transformations of K4SnS4 and K4Sn2S6 upon dissolution in
H2O, FA, MFA, and N2H4. Solution 119Sn NMR spectra of K4SnS4 dissolved
in H2O (A, 74 ppm), K4SnS4 dissolved
in MFA (B, 68 ppm corresponding to K6Sn2S7, see main text), K4Sn2S6 in FA (C, 55 ppm, corresponding to K4Sn2S6), (N2H4)4Sn2S6 in hydrazine (49 ppm). Two kinds of S atoms are present in
SnS44– (4 terminal, 0 bridging), Sn2S64– (4 terminal, 2 bridging),
and Sn2S76– (6 terminal, one
bridging).
General scheme for transformations of K4SnS4 and K4Sn2S6 upon dissolution in
H2O, FA, MFA, and N2H4. Solution 119Sn NMR spectra of K4SnS4 dissolved
in H2O (A, 74 ppm), K4SnS4 dissolved
in MFA (B, 68 ppm corresponding to K6Sn2S7, see main text), K4Sn2S6 in FA (C, 55 ppm, corresponding to K4Sn2S6), (N2H4)4Sn2S6 in hydrazine (49 ppm). Two kinds of S atoms are present in
SnS44– (4 terminal, 0 bridging), Sn2S64– (4 terminal, 2 bridging),
and Sn2S76– (6 terminal, one
bridging).A clear distinction between all
three thiostannate ions can be
obtained also by Raman spectroscopy (Figure 3). The solid-state Raman spectrum of K4Sn2S6 is characterized by two symmetric Sn–Sterminal vibrations at 386 and 373 cm–1, vibration of Sn2S2 ring at 277 cm–1, and Sn–Sbridging vibration at 347 cm–1;[18b,37d,44] K4SnS4 exhibits
only two bands at 351 and 370 cm–1, characteristic
of symmetric and asymmetric Sn–S modes.[18b,37a] The spectrum of solid K6Sn2S7 isolated
from MFA is characterized by the strong band at ca. 360 cm–1, presumably due to SnS3–S–SnS3 bridges, while the other two modes at 340–1 and
380 cm–1 are assigned to Sn–S vibrations
(similar to SnS44–). The solution phase
Raman spectra of Sn2S64– in
FA and Sn2S76– in MFA resemble
those of the solid-state samples. Further illustrating the effect
of solvent, the pH value of the solution plays an important role as
well. Sn2S76–/MFA converts
into Sn2S64–/MFA upon addition
of KOH K2S (that reacts with residual moisture giving KOH
and KHS). This can be explained by the importance of protonation for
the stability of Sn2S76–.
In N2H4, only Sn2S64– is stable, and it does not convert into SnS44– or Sn2S76– upon addition of S2– (Supporting
Information Figure S4). On the basis of the above solution 119Sn NMR and Raman spectroscopic data, we further studied
the LE with the oleate capped NCs for four ligand/solvent combinations.
Only those ligand/solvent combinations which clearly yield a single
form of anion without altering the pH of the solution (Figure 2) were chosen: SnS44–/H2O, Sn2S64–/FA,
Sn2S64–/N2H4, and Sn2S76–/MFA.
Figure 3
(A) Raman
spectra of solid K4SnS4 (green),
K4Sn2S6 (blue), and K6Sn2S7 (red). (B) Solution-phase Raman spectra
of K4Sn2S6 in FA (blue) and K6Sn2S7 in MFA (red).
(A) Raman
spectra of solid K4SnS4 (green),
K4Sn2S6 (blue), and K6Sn2S7 (red). (B) Solution-phase Raman spectra
of K4Sn2S6 in FA (blue) and K6Sn2S7 in MFA (red).Upon binding of the anions to the NC the isotropic molecular
tumbling
slows, leading to significant broadening and attenuation of NMR signals
from bound ligands.[45] The NMR signal broadening
arises from large anisotropic dipolar couplings and anisotropies of
the chemical shifts which are no longer averaged away.[46] In the case of MCC ligands bound to the NC surface,
the signal mostly vanishes (Figure 4), allowing
quantitative estimation of the amount of surface-bound ligands by
measuring intensity from the remaining unbound ligand. Thiostannate
ligands can act as polydentate ligands due to multiple terminal S
atoms. On the basis of the LE reaction shown in Scheme 1, the following solution equilibrium between bound and unbound
MCC ligand can be postulated assuming K6Sn2S7 as a single thiostannate form in MFA:
Figure 4
Solution 119Sn NMR spectra
for K4Sn2S6/FA and K6Sn2S7/MFA
solutions before LE, and after LE with increasing amounts of CdSe
NCs. Note that 24 mg of CdSe NCs corresponds to y/m ratio of ca. 2–2.2 in eq 1; i.e., the amount of thiostannate ligand is sufficiently
high for monodentate binding to all surface Cd atoms. Inset shows
NMR tubes before and after LE.
The
exchange of bound and unbound MCC ligand is rather slow, as
the NMR spectra for unbound ligands do not show broadening or a change
in the chemical shift which would indicate fast exchange of bound
and unbound ligand.[22g] Composition 1b represents an extreme case, in which full
denticity of Sn2S76– is used
(κ6-Sn2S76– in the terminology of coordination chemistry); that is, each Sn2S76– forms 6 bonds with surface
Cd2+. An opposite extreme is the κ1-Sn2S76– bonding motif, that is,
monodenticity of the ligand at y = 2m. Thus, in principle the amount of surface-bound Sn2S76– ligand can adopt values of m/3 ≤ y ≤ 2m, due
to facile rearrangement of Cd-MCC bonds with variable denticity of
MCC ligand. Quantitatively, after first addition of oleate-capped
CdSe NCs (12 mg, Figure 3B), the K6Sn2S7 ligand coverage was ∼4 ligands
nm–2. Note that this coverage corresponds to y ≈ 2.5m, which exceeds the 2m limit discussed above, but may be explained by the additional
week nonspecific binding of MCCs. After the number of CdSe particles
in solution was doubled, the amount of ligands on the surface decreased
to 2.2 ligands nm–2 for K6Sn2S7, which corresponds to y ≈ 1.4m. This shows that the initial binding of K6Sn2S7 is labile and K6Sn2S7 can detach and engage in a LE reaction with the oleate-capped
CdSe, in agreement with postulated equilibrium reaction 1. After double precipitation with MeCN, the ICP-OES analysis
shows 1.2 L nm–2, that is y ≈
0.7m. Note that single-washed NCs are still well-dispersible
in MFA, whereas double-washed NCs show much lower solubility in MFA,
the difference which is best seen for larger NCs. When y approaches m/3 (composition 1b) due to further washing steps, particles should contain
no K+ rendering them fully insoluble in polar solvents.
Fully analogous observations are found for K4Sn2S6 and other MCC ligands.Solution 119Sn NMR spectra
for K4Sn2S6/FA and K6Sn2S7/MFA
solutions before LE, and after LE with increasing amounts of CdSe
NCs. Note that 24 mg of CdSe NCs corresponds to y/m ratio of ca. 2–2.2 in eq 1; i.e., the amount of thiostannate ligand is sufficiently
high for monodentate binding to all surface Cd atoms. Inset shows
NMR tubes before and after LE.It is also important to note that the reverse exchange, e.g.,
displacement
of MCCs by K-oleate and transfer of CdSe NCs back to the nonpolar
phase, requires 20-fold molar excess of oleate, and takes up to 1–2
weeks, compared to minutes for direct LE. This is again in agreement
with strong multidentate binding of thoistannate ligands to the NCs
surface.
Concurrent MCC LE Reactions
Convenient monitoring of
thiostannate concentrations by 119Sn solution NMR also
allows qualitative comparison of concurrent LE reactions with other
MCC ligands. For example, when a 1:1 molar mixture of K6Sn2S7 and K3SbS4 (Figure 5) or K6Sn2S7 and
K3AsS4 (Supporting Information Figure S5) is reacted with oleate-capped CdSe NCs the solution 119Sn NMR signal in NMR spectra decreases at the same rate
as for pure K6Sn2S7, pointing to
preferential binding of Sn2S76– ions as compared to the other MCC. However, a K6Sn2S7:K4GeS4 mixture shows no
signs of K6Sn2S7 binding to the NC
surface during the phase transfer of CdSe NCs, suggesting that GeS44– has a stronger binding affinity. The
comparison of metal-free S2– with MCCs is another
important point, especially because S2– is expected
in the solutions of most MCCs. Only when a 10-fold excess of K2S with respect to K6Sn2S7 is added do we notice a slower decrease in the Sn signal in comparison
with pure K6Sn2S7-based LE (Figure 5C). Hence a binding affinity sequence K4GeS4 > K6Sn2S7 >
K3SbS4 (K3AsS4) > K2S can be established for the organic-to-inorganic LE.
Figure 5
Concurrent LE reaction by adding oleate-capped
CdSe NCs into solutions
of (A) K6Sn2S7 and K3SbS4 or (B) K6Sn2S7 and K4GeS4. (C) A graph illustrating the decrease of
the integrals of the 119Sn NMR signal upon titration with
oleate-capped CdSe NCs (6 mg = 32 μmol). The initial K6Sn2S7 was 5 mg (7 μmol) in a 0.5 mL reaction
volume. All ligand mixtures are equimolar, except where 10-fold access
is indicated.
Concurrent LE reaction by adding oleate-capped
CdSe NCs into solutions
of (A) K6Sn2S7 and K3SbS4 or (B) K6Sn2S7 and K4GeS4. (C) A graph illustrating the decrease of
the integrals of the 119Sn NMR signal upon titration with
oleate-capped CdSe NCs (6 mg = 32 μmol). The initial K6Sn2S7 was 5 mg (7 μmol) in a 0.5 mL reaction
volume. All ligand mixtures are equimolar, except where 10-fold access
is indicated.
Solid-State 119Sn NMR Observation of Thiostannate
Ligands Bound to the NC Surface
Having confirmed that thiostannate
ions disappear from the solution and bind to the NC surface as a result
of the LE reaction, we now turn our focus on the establishing bonding
motifs at the NC/MCC surface. We used solid-state magic angle spinning
(MAS) 119Sn NMR spectroscopy to average the anisotropic
NMR interactions and obtain solution-like NMR spectra of the MCC capped
NCs.[40,47] The 119Sn solid-state NMR spectra
of the MCC capped NCs are compared to spectra of the pure solid unbound
ligands and with the solution 119Sn NMR chemical shifts
of the dissolved ligands (Figure 6).
Figure 6
(A) Solid-state
MAS 119Sn NMR for K4SnS4, K4Sn2S6, and K6Sn2S7 powders. (B) Solid-state CPMG MAS 119Sn NMR for
CdSe/K4SnS4 (LE in H2O), CdSe/K4Sn2S6 (LE in FA),
CdSe/K6Sn2S7 (LE in MFA), and CdSe/K4Sn2S6 (LE in N2H4). Three dash lines correspond to 74, 55, and 50 ppm, respectively
(expected peaks for unbound ligands). The * represents the spinning
side bands.
(A) Solid-state
MAS 119Sn NMR for K4SnS4, K4Sn2S6, and K6Sn2S7 powders. (B) Solid-state CPMG MAS 119Sn NMR for
CdSe/K4SnS4 (LE in H2O), CdSe/K4Sn2S6 (LE in FA),
CdSe/K6Sn2S7 (LE in MFA), and CdSe/K4Sn2S6 (LE in N2H4). Three dash lines correspond to 74, 55, and 50 ppm, respectively
(expected peaks for unbound ligands). The * represents the spinning
side bands.Similar to solution NMR
spectra, δ(119Sn) in the
MAS 119Sn NMR spectra of solid free ligands falls in the
range 50–74 ppm. While the spectrum of solid K4SnS4 is characterized by one narrow peak at 74 ppm (in good agreement
with the corresponding chemical shift for K4SnS4 dissolved in water), the spectrum of K4Sn2S6 contains two peaks: one broad peak corresponds to K4Sn2S6 at 50 ppm[42] and the narrow peak at 74 ppm from K4SnS4.
The intensity of the isotropic K4SnS4 peak at
74 ppm appears to be more intense because the peaks from K4Sn2S6 are much broader and also dispersed over
several spinning side bands. Keeping in mind that the longitudinal
relaxation rate of the K4Sn2S6 peak
also appeared to be slower, the NMR spectra indicate that at most
only 10% of the K4Sn2S6 sample corresponds
to K4SnS4. The product isolated from K6Sn2S7/MFA solution by adding acetonitrile shows
signals at 74 ppm (50% integrated intensity, K4SnS4) and at 55 ppm (50%, attributed to K6Sn2S7).In order to overcome the low concentration
of Sn atoms in the MCC
capped NC samples, we applied a CPMG pulse sequence[26,48] to maximize the signal-to-noise of the spectra of the NC-ligand
samples (Figure 6B). Overall, the chemical
shifts fall in the same range as for the free ligands, indicating
very similar tetrahedral SnS4 environment of Sn. However,
the peaks are considerably broader than those observed for the pure
ligand samples, which is suggestive of a spread of binding motifs:
various denticity conformations of ligands and distribution of binding
sites on the NC surface (different facets, edges of facets, etc.).
The downfield shifts of several ppm may arise due to binding of the
thiostannate ions with the NC surface and from the formation of covalent
Cd–S bonds. No unambiguous differentiation between SnS44–, Sn2S76–, or Sn2S64– can be made
due to signal broadening. Furthermore, formation of SnS2 on the NC surface can also be excluded, as it should manifest itself
by the peak at −765 ppm in the solid-state 119Sn
NMR spectrum (for pure spectra of pure SnS2 see Supporting Information Figure S6). No other Sn-containing
species could be detected with solid-state NMR spectroscopy. In the
case of CdSe/K4Sn2S6/N2H4 samples, a clear splitting of 119Sn NMR spectrum is observed that may indicate, for instance, two
distinct binding modes of a ligand or mixed Sn2S64–/Sn2S76– surface coverage.77Se CPMG MAS NMR spectra of
CdSe NCs capped with thiostannate
ligands contain a main peak at −528.5 ppm with ∼50 ppm
broadening and a shoulder at −557.4 ppm (Supporting Information Figure S7). This line shape and more
negative chemical shifts as compared to bulk CdSe (−472.3 ppm)
are fully consistent with quantum-size effects and core–shell
distribution of chemical shifts (more negative for near surface Se
layer).[49]
Observation of Thiostannate
Ligands on the NC Surface with Far-IR
Spectroscopy
Far-IR spectroscopy (100–600 cm–1) may serve as excellent tool for studying inorganic capping of colloidal
NCs because this region corresponds to vibrational frequencies of
bonds formed by heavier atoms such as Cd, Sn, and chalcogens and because
organic ligands and other light-atom residues (solvents, etc.) show
virtually no absorption. Previously, far-IR spectra were seldom used
for characterization of colloidal NCs.[50] We note that, as expected, Raman spectra were not conclusive due
to the fluorescence background from NCs and due to drastic difference
in scattering intensity not only between solid NC cores (very weak
signals) and molecular species (much greater signals), but between
various molecules. Far-IR spectra of CdSe/oleate and “ligand-free”
CdSe NCs (Figure 7) are very similar and contain
a relatively narrow peak at 183 cm–1 characteristic
of ν(Cd–Se) stretching frequencies,[51] and consistent with Raman shifts of transverse optical
(156 cm–1) and longitudinal optical (215 cm–1) phonons.[52] The spectrum
of CdSe/BF4– shows only peaks associated
with CdSe. This is consistent with only weak electrostatic interactions
between BF4– and the surface Cd2+ adatoms.
Figure 7
Far-IR ATR spectra for CdSe NCs with various surface chemistries.
(A) CdSe/oleate (black), CdSeCdS/oleate (orange), CdSe/BF4– (gray), CdSe/S2– (green), K2S (dashed green spectrum). (B) CdSe/oleate (black), CdSe/S2– (green), CdSe/Sn2S64– (blue), CdSe/Sn2S76– (red).
Far-IR ATR spectra for CdSe NCs with various surface chemistries.
(A) CdSe/oleate (black), CdSeCdS/oleate (orange), CdSe/BF4– (gray), CdSe/S2– (green), K2S (dashed green spectrum). (B) CdSe/oleate (black), CdSe/S2– (green), CdSe/Sn2S64– (blue), CdSe/Sn2S76– (red).Core–shell CdSe/CdS NCs
(oleate capped, 4.5 nm core and
2 nm shell)[53] were also measured as a reference
material for all MCCs in order to observe the effect of Cd–S
bonds on the far-IR spectra. In CdSe/CdS NCs, a broad and intense
peak at 242 cm–1 characteristic of CdS shell[51] and considerable broadening in CdSe region (with
a small shoulder at 142 cm–1, presumably due to
the effects of strain and alloying at CdSe/CdS interface) were observed.
In CdSe/S2– NCs, a broad shoulder at 260 cm–1 due to Cd–S– bonds[54] was slightly upshifted compared to pure CdS
due to the formation of shorter Cd–S bonds at the NC surface
than in pure CdS. Broadening of CdSe features was also observed. Figure 7B compares the far-IR spectra of CdSe NCs capped
with different thiostannate ligands. The major common feature is intense
absorption in the 240–300 cm–1 range due
to the formation of Cd–S bonds. The broadening and downshift
of CdSe band for CdSe/Sn2S64– and CdSe/Sn2S76– are very
similar to CdSe/S2– and may also be the effect of
the higher absorbance of ligands below 200 cm–1 (Supporting Information Figure S8). As expected,
far-IR spectra of the pure K4SnS4, K4Sn2S6, and K4Sn2S7 compounds are distinctly different from each other, and from
the surface-bound species, and agree well with the literature (see Supporting Information for further discussion).
Thiostannate Bonding Motifs from X-ray Absorption Spectroscopy
and DFT Simulations
Qualitatively, both far-IR and NMR spectroscopy
clearly indicate that thiostannate ions are covalently attached to
the surface of CdSe, and on the basis of the NMR spectra, the basic
four-coordinate SnS4 coordination environment is preserved
in all cases. Further insights into the binding modes and bond distances
were gained with X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS). Sn K-edge XAS
spectra allow the study of the local electronic and geometric structure
(up to 6 Å) around Sn atoms, and are also applicable to disordered
systems such as surface-bound ligands. In order to evaluate the data
from the XAS measurements we took a Fourier transform of the spectra
into frequency space, which results in a radial structure function
(RSF) where peaks correspond to the distances to the nearest-neighbors.
Fitting of the EXAFS region was performed using theoretical Sn–S
references generated from crystal structures of Na4SnS4, Na4Sn2S6, and Na6Sn2S7. The value of the amplitude reduced factor
(S02) was determined by fitting the first shell
using the references (S02 = 4.6) and the coordination
number (CN), Debye–Waller factor (DW), interatomic distance
(R), and edge-shift (ΔE0). For the free ligands, two major peaks could be distinguished
in the RSFs (Figure 8A–C, Table 1), and they indicate close to expected interatomic
distances (d) and coordination numbers (CN): only
one type of Sn–S bond with d(Sn–S)
= 2.4 Å and CN = 4 in K4SnS4, and two bonds
in K4Sn2S6 and K4Sn2S7 [Sn–S1 (terminal, ∼2.35
Å) and Sn–S2 (bridging, ∼2.50 Å)]
with CN close to the expected value (CN = 1–2). The bond lengths
are in good agreement with crystallographic data[37] and with our DFT calculations.
Figure 8
Fourier transform magnitude
and imaginary part of the full XAS
spectra of (A)K4SnS4, (B) K4Sn2S6, (C) K6Sn2S7 and (D) CdSe/K4SnS4 (LE in H2O),
(E) CdSe/K4Sn2S6 (LE in FA), (F)
CdSe/K4Sn2S6 (LE in N2H4), (G) CdSe/K6Sn2S7 (LE in MFA). Solid lines represent the experimental data; dotted
lines represent the best fit. R + ΔR scale represents distances with phase correction.
Table 1
Structural Information for Reference
Samples and Capped NCs from Best Fitting of the EXAFS Spectra (Figure 8)a
sample
path
CN
Rt (Å)
Rt DFT (Å)
DW (Å2)
E0 (eV)
R-factor
(free) K4SnS4
Sn–S
4.1 ± 0.6
2.41 ± 0.017
2.4
0.0107 ± 0.0025
2.03 ± 1.74
0.0075
(free) K4Sn2S6
Sn–Sdangl
1.8 ± 0.4
2.34 ± 0.018
2.35
0.0010 ± 0.0019
6.68 ± 1.37
0.0043
Sn–Sbridge
2.0 ± 0.5
2.46 ± 0.018
2.46
(free) K6Sn2S7
Sn–Sdangl
2.4 ± 0.9
2.37 ± 0.003
2.37
0.0008 ± 0.0009
8.17 ± 1.17
0.0078
Sn–Sbridge
1.6 ± 0.8
2.48 ± 0.003
2.47
CdSe/Sn2S64-/FA
Sn–Sdangl
1.4 ± 0.2
2.27 ± 0.016
0.0004 ± 0.0015
0.83 ± 0.29
0.0051
Sn–Sbridge,surf
2.6 ± 0.7
2.42 ± 0.012
0.0004 ± 0.0015
Sn–O
0.7 ± 0.2
2.00 ± 0.019
0.0004 ± 0.0015
Sn–Cd
0.6 ± 0.2
3.77 ± 0.020
0.0024 ± 0.0010
CdSe/Sn2S76-/MFA
Sn–Sdangl
0.7 ± 0.4
2.24 ± 0.057
2.27
0.0038 ± 0.0018
3.59 ± 0.88
0.0089
Sn–Sbridge,surf
3.8 ± 0.7
2.41 ± 0.012
2.44
0.0038 ± 0.0018
Sn–Cd
0.9 ± 0.2
3.37 ± 0.012
3.99
0.0024 ± 0.0010
CdSe/Sn2S64–/N2H4
Sn–Sdangl
1.1 ± 0.1
2.30 ± 0.009
2.25
0.0002 ± 0.0003
4.14 ± 0.91
0.0078
Sn–Sbridge,surf
1.7 ± 0.2
2.44 ± 0.007
2.48
0.0002 ± 0.0003
Sn–O
0.2 ± 0.1
1.97 ± 0.033
0.0002 ± 0.0003
Sn–Cd
1.0 ± 0.7
3.51 ± 0.021
3.5–4.1
0.0063 ± 0.0063
CdSe/SnS44–/H2O
Sn–S
1.3 ± 0.3
2.42 ± 0.020
2.31–2.44
0.0037 ± 0.0013
7.64 ± 0.93
0.0076
Sn–O
2.8 ± 0.2
2.06 ± 0.011
0.0037 ± 0.0013
Sn–Cd
0.5 ± 0.2
3.51 ± 0.015
3.86
0.0002 ± 0.0001
Coordination
number (CN), bond
distance from XAFS (Rt), bond distance
from DFT (Rt DFT), pseudo-Debye–Waller
factor (DW), energy shift (E0), R factor obtailed from the fits.
Fourier transform magnitude
and imaginary part of the full XAS
spectra of (A)K4SnS4, (B) K4Sn2S6, (C) K6Sn2S7 and (D) CdSe/K4SnS4 (LE in H2O),
(E) CdSe/K4Sn2S6 (LE in FA), (F)
CdSe/K4Sn2S6 (LE in N2H4), (G) CdSe/K6Sn2S7 (LE in MFA). Solid lines represent the experimental data; dotted
lines represent the best fit. R + ΔR scale represents distances with phase correction.Chemical binding of thiostannates
to surface Cd atoms should modify
the overall geometry of the ligand and its local coordination environment.
Further, the surface conformation of a ligand will depend on the surface
coverage, facet to which ligand binds, etc. It is therefore not possible
to deduce the exact surface geometry, but rather to monitor the key
differences to unbound ligands, primarily in the bond distances and
coordination numbers. XAS studies on NCs after LE (Figure 8D–G) indicate important changes with respect
to free crystalline ligands and unambiguously confirm chemical binding
of thiostannate ligands onto NC surface. One important feature that
was not directly observed by other techniques and reported here for
the first time is that there is strong evidence for Sn–O bonds
in XAS spectra of CdSe NCs capped with K4SnS4 in H2O (d(Sn–O) = 2.1 Å).
Judging from CNs, a particularly high proportion of Sn–O bonds
are found in K4SnS4/H2O (CN = 2.8
for Sn–O bonding) system, and only one type of Sn–S
with d = 2.4 Å and CN = 1.3, suggesting an overall
stoichiometry of [SnO3S]4– (which can
also correspond to a mixture of SnS44– and SnO44– ions). This can be explained
by well-known hydrolysis of chalcogenidometallates in water at high
pH, and this may also occur in nonaqueous solutions handled in air
(as in this study). Also, CdSe NCs can aid the formation of Sn–O
bonds in aqueous environment and even in powdered solids through photocatalytic
oxidation of Sn–S by photogenerated holes. On the contrary,
for the nonaqueous LE systems we observed a much smaller proportion
of Sn–O bonds (CN = 0.2–0.9, Table 1). Further, and very importantly, two types of Sn–S
bonds are found for Sn2S64– and Sn2S76–, and all Sn–S
distances are shorter, on average by 0.1 Å as compared to reference
to unbound ligands, in agreement with DFT calculations (see below).
The second coordination shell was fitted by introducing Cd (or Sn)
atoms into the existing scattering paths by replacing the Na atoms
and optimizing the parameters (Figure 8D,F,E,G).
The shortest Sn–Cd distance of 3.37–3.8 Å was found
for Sn2S76– (CN ∼ 1)
and is attributed to Cd–S–Sn bridge which is in good
agreement with the distances obtained by DFT modeling. We note that
for NC-ligand samples the distances in the second shell are precisely
fitted, while CN values are much less accurate.Coordination
number (CN), bond
distance from XAFS (Rt), bond distance
from DFT (Rt DFT), pseudo-Debye–Waller
factor (DW), energy shift (E0), R factor obtailed from the fits.For DFT simulations, theoretical models were prepared
on the basis
of the experimental findings: one terminal S atom from thiostannate
ligand was coordinated to one adsorption site on the surface, displacing
the original oleate (or halide) ligand, while each unbound terminal
S was compensated by a potassium counterion. Calculations show that
the thiostannate binding energy is 0.6 eV per site higher than for
oleate, suggesting an energetically favored displacement. For a 3
nm model NC with exclusively K4Sn2S7 capping ligand, such a procedure leads to a stable configuration
with no S2– or K2S desorption, as verified
by molecular dynamics. Calculated energy required for desorption of
K2S is 4.1 eV with explicit inclusion of coordinating MFA
molecules. The relaxed structure with stoichiometry Cd1.18Se1Sn0.18S0.63K0.18 is shown in Figure 9a. A similarly stable
configuration can be constructed with K4SnS4.
Figure 9
DFT modeling
of thiostannate-capped CdSe NCs: (a) relaxed gometry
of a 3 nm CdSe NC capped with Sn2S76– ligands; (b) stable binding geometries of SnS44– and Sn2S76– ligands on (100)
CdSe surface; (d) projected density of states for a free K4SnS4 ligand and for CdSe-K4SnS4 NC;
(e) spatial distribution of the trap and electronic states in a 2.5
nm model.
To study the binding geometries in details, a smaller trap-free
2.5 nm CdSe model NC with one thiostannate ligand per facet was used.
The (100) facets provide a tetrahedral lattice scaffold, helping maintain
the tetrahedral coordination of Sn. For a SnS4 complex
it means two S atoms bind to the surface with the other two S unbound
(Figure 9b). However, such dangling S atoms
are highly unfavorable, and after relaxation one of them falls onto
the surface by tilting the SnS4 tetrahedron, and forming
a bond to Cd (dotted lines) that breaks the periodicity of the original
lattice. The remaining S is unable to distort the SnS4 tetrahedron
sufficiently in order to reach the surface and thus stays unbound,
stabilized by the available potassium counterion. In the absence of
potassium ions, this S atom tends to diffuse along the surface away
from the SnS complex, exposing the Sn atom, or dimerizes with other
available S from the same thiostannate complex or from complexes adsorbed
nearby, thus stabilizing it against desorption. Similar behavior is
observed for Sn2S76– in which
the bridging S makes the unit more rigid so that both dangling S cannot
reach the surface (Figure 9c). For Sn2S64–, the rigid Sn2S2 ring precludes compliance with the underlying lattice; however,
the ligand still maximizes its denticity by distorting the SnS4 tetrahedra (see geometries in Supporting
Information). Over the duration of our molecular dynamics runs
we have not observed the fragmentation of Sn2S64–; however, we expect it to be quite possible.
Overall, thiostannate complexes tend to maximize the amount of bonds
to the surface, while counterions are found to be important for stabilization
of Sn tetrahedral coordination. However, it is not uncommon for this
tetrahedron to break.Calculated distances in the relaxed geometries
are presented in
Table 1 and in general agree with EXAFS observations:
the bond from Sn to dangling S is shorter, while Sn to surface-bound
S and bridging S are practically identical and longer. EXAFS findings
of slightly lower coordination numbers to dangling S may be indicative
of rare detachment of a dangling S from Sn tetrahedra, as observed
in theoretical model, but most of them remain intact. The theoretical
model provides an Sn and Cd coordination numbers of 4, drastically
different from EXAFS values. This can be attributed to inaccurate
fitting of the second shell in EXAFS spectra of surface bound ligands.
The predicted Sn–Cd distance of 3.86–3.99 Å is
comparable to and slightly higher than experimental values.DFT modeling
of thiostannate-capped CdSe NCs: (a) relaxed gometry
of a 3 nm CdSe NC capped with Sn2S76– ligands; (b) stable binding geometries of SnS44– and Sn2S76– ligands on (100)
CdSe surface; (d) projected density of states for a free K4SnS4 ligand and for CdSe-K4SnS4 NC;
(e) spatial distribution of the trap and electronic states in a 2.5
nm model.The quality of surface passivation
by thiostannate ions can be
judged from the analysis of projected densities of states and HOMO
and LUMO wave functions (Figure 9d,e). PDOS
plots clearly show that thiostannate ligand creates hole traps on
an initially trap-free NC which are localized mainly on dangling and
bridging S atoms (Figure 9e). This is expected
since the free ligand has HOMO levels deep in the bandgap of CdSe
(Figure 9d). This is consistent with the low
photoluminescence quantum yield (PL QY) of the MCC-capped CdSe NCs
(usually below 1%)[9b] and drastically shorter
ON-state in single-particle blinking trajectories of MCC-capped CdSe/CdS
NCs.[55] Surprisingly, despite all the disorder
of the surface (Figure 9a), the conduction
band remains clear of traps thanks to self-healing also observed previously
on ligand-free CdSe NCs,[56] consistent with
excellent n-type conductivity of the CdSe-MCC films.[9b,14a]
Conclusions
In conclusion, we have conducted a detailed
experimental and theoretical
study of the inorganic surface functionalization of CdSe NCs by thiostannate
and similar sulfur-based ligands. The combined analysis of solution 1H NMR, solution and solid-state 119Sn NMR, far-IR
and XAS spectroscopies, and DFT modeling is consistent with the X-type
ligand exchange mechanism. During the ligand exchange reaction, CdSe
NCs retain their Cd-rich stoichiometry, where surface Cd adatoms serve
as binding sites for terminal S atoms from chalcogenidometallate ligands
leading to all-inorganic (CdSe)core[Cd(Sn2S7)K(6]shell stoichiometry, taking Sn2S76– as inorganic ligands, and K-oleate as side product. DFT modeling
combined with molecular dynamics, with or without inclusion of the
polar solvent molecules into simulations (corresponding to colloidal
or powdered state, respectively), confirms stable Cd-rich composition
upon adsorption of Sn2S76– or SnS44– ligands. We note that NC
compositions are very dynamic due to ligand adsorption–desorption
equilibria and surface reconstruction. Furthermore, thiostannates
SnS44– and Sn2S76– retain 4-coordinate Sn, despite the occurrence
of significant distortions due to surface-binding. At the same time,
experiments and simulations point to the instability of Sn2S64– (and SnS32–) in all studied solvents and its lower adaptability to the NC surface
caused by rigid Sn2S2 rings. We suppose that
the main observations of this study such as retention of metal-rich
surfaces and X-type ligand exchange should be generally true for all
strongly binding inorganic ligands such as chalcogenidometallates
and metal-free chalcogenide ions. However, other inorganic ligand
systems such as halometallates may exhibit different behaviors and
should be studied in detail.
Authors: Weon-Kyu Koh; Sangameshwar R Saudari; Aaron T Fafarman; Cherie R Kagan; Christopher B Murray Journal: Nano Lett Date: 2011-10-24 Impact factor: 11.189
Authors: Alexander H Ip; Susanna M Thon; Sjoerd Hoogland; Oleksandr Voznyy; David Zhitomirsky; Ratan Debnath; Larissa Levina; Lisa R Rollny; Graham H Carey; Armin Fischer; Kyle W Kemp; Illan J Kramer; Zhijun Ning; André J Labelle; Kang Wei Chou; Aram Amassian; Edward H Sargent Journal: Nat Nanotechnol Date: 2012-07-29 Impact factor: 39.213
Authors: Maksym V Kovalenko; Richard D Schaller; Dorota Jarzab; Maria A Loi; Dmitri V Talapin Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2012-01-26 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Felix Hartmann; Assma Benkada; Sylvio Indris; Michael Poschmann; Henning Lühmann; Patrick Duchstein; Dirk Zahn; Wolfgang Bensch Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl Date: 2022-07-04 Impact factor: 16.823
Authors: Emanuele Marino; Thomas E Kodger; Ryan W Crisp; Dolf Timmerman; Katherine E MacArthur; Marc Heggen; Peter Schall Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl Date: 2017-09-26 Impact factor: 15.336
Authors: Ward van der Stam; Indy du Fossé; Gianluca Grimaldi; Julius O V Monchen; Nicholas Kirkwood; Arjan J Houtepen Journal: Chem Mater Date: 2018-10-23 Impact factor: 9.811