Literature DB >> 23383676

Systematic analysis of esophageal pressure topography in high-resolution manometry of 68 normal volunteers.

S Niebisch1, C L Wilshire, J H Peters.   

Abstract

The introduction of high-resolution manometry (HRM) has been a significant advance in esophageal diagnostics. Normative values however are currently based upon a single set of published reference values, and multiple new metrics have been added over the past several years. Our goal was to provide a second set of 'normal-values' and to include all current metrics suggested by the 2012 Chicago classification. Sixty-eight subjects without foregut symptoms or previous surgery (median age 25.5 years, ranging from 20-58 years, 53% female) underwent esophageal motility assessment via an established standardized protocol. Normative thresholds were calculated for esophago-gastric junction (EGJ) characteristics (resting, relaxation, intrabolus pressure, and lengths) as well as for esophageal body strength (contraction amplitudes at multiple levels, distal contractile integral, integrity of peristalsis) and wave propagation (contractile front velocity, distal latency). Overall, our findings where strikingly similar to the previously described metrics derived from 75 control subjects of the Northwestern group. This suggests a high degree of reproducibility of HRM.
© 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. and the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus.

Entities:  

Keywords:  HRM; asymptomatic volunteer; high-resolution manometry; reference value; swallow protocol

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23383676     DOI: 10.1111/dote.12027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Esophagus        ISSN: 1120-8694            Impact factor:   3.429


  15 in total

1.  Comparison of two high-resolution manometry software systems in evaluating esophageal motor function.

Authors:  A Rengarajan; J Drapekin; A Patel; C P Gyawali
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 3.598

2.  Significant pressure differences between solid-state and water-perfused systems in lower esophageal sphincter measurement.

Authors:  Philipp Gehwolf; Ronald A Hinder; Kenneth R DeVault; Michael Edlinger; Heinz F Wykypiel; Paul J Klingler
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-02-21       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  The Chicago Classification 3.0 Results in More Normal Findings and Fewer Hypotensive Findings With No Difference in Other Diagnoses.

Authors:  H Monrroy; D Cisternas; C Bilder; A Ditaranto; J Remes-Troche; A Meixueiro; M A Zavala; J Serra; I Marín; A Ruiz de León; J Pérez de la Serna; A Hani; A Leguizamo; L Abrahao; R Coello; M A Valdovinos
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 10.864

4.  Normal Values of High-Resolution Manometry in Supine and Upright Positions in a Thai Population.

Authors:  Pitichote Hiranyatheb; Suriya Chakkaphak; Supphamat Chirnaksorn; Pattaraporn Lekhaka; Kaimuk Petsrikun; Kornkanok Somboonpun
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2017-11-15       Impact factor: 3.199

5.  The Chicago Classification of esophageal motility disorders, v3.0.

Authors:  P J Kahrilas; A J Bredenoord; M Fox; C P Gyawali; S Roman; A J P M Smout; J E Pandolfino
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2014-12-03       Impact factor: 3.598

Review 6.  The Chicago classification of motility disorders: an update.

Authors:  Sabine Roman; C Prakash Gyawali; Yinglian Xiao; John E Pandolfino; Peter J Kahrilas
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am       Date:  2014-08-01

Review 7.  Before and after Esophageal Surgery: Which Information Is Needed from the Functional Laboratory?

Authors:  Ines Gockel; Sebastian Murad Rabe; Stefan Niebisch
Journal:  Visc Med       Date:  2018-04-20

Review 8.  Esophageal motility disorders on high-resolution manometry: Chicago classification version 4.0©.

Authors:  Rena Yadlapati; Peter J Kahrilas; Mark R Fox; Albert J Bredenoord; C Prakash Gyawali; Sabine Roman; Arash Babaei; Ravinder K Mittal; Nathalie Rommel; Edoardo Savarino; Daniel Sifrim; André Smout; Michael F Vaezi; Frank Zerbib; Junichi Akiyama; Shobna Bhatia; Serhat Bor; Dustin A Carlson; Joan W Chen; Daniel Cisternas; Charles Cock; Enrique Coss-Adame; Nicola de Bortoli; Claudia Defilippi; Ronnie Fass; Uday C Ghoshal; Sutep Gonlachanvit; Albis Hani; Geoffrey S Hebbard; Kee Wook Jung; Philip Katz; David A Katzka; Abraham Khan; Geoffrey Paul Kohn; Adriana Lazarescu; Johannes Lengliner; Sumeet K Mittal; Taher Omari; Moo In Park; Roberto Penagini; Daniel Pohl; Joel E Richter; Jordi Serra; Rami Sweis; Jan Tack; Roger P Tatum; Radu Tutuian; Marcelo F Vela; Reuben K Wong; Justin C Wu; Yinglian Xiao; John E Pandolfino
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 3.598

9.  Effect of Body Position on High-resolution Esophageal Manometry Variables and Final Manometric Diagnosis.

Authors:  Carlo G Riva; Stefano Siboni; Davide Ferrari; Marco Sozzi; Matteo Capuzzo; Emanuele Asti; Cristina Ogliari; Luigi Bonavina
Journal:  J Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2020-07-30       Impact factor: 4.924

10.  Clinical Application of Esophageal High-resolution Manometry in the Diagnosis of Esophageal Motility Disorders.

Authors:  Froukje B van Hoeij; Albert J Bredenoord
Journal:  J Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2016-01-31       Impact factor: 4.924

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.