Literature DB >> 25463474

Hierarchical multi-atlas label fusion with multi-scale feature representation and label-specific patch partition.

Guorong Wu1, Minjeong Kim1, Gerard Sanroma1, Qian Wang2, Brent C Munsell3, Dinggang Shen4.   

Abstract

Multi-atlas patch-based label fusion methods have been successfully used to improve segmentation accuracy in many important medical image analysis applications. In general, to achieve label fusion a single target image is first registered to several atlas images. After registration a label is assigned to each target point in the target image by determining the similarity between the underlying target image patch (centered at the target point) and the aligned image patch in each atlas image. To achieve the highest level of accuracy during the label fusion process it's critical for the chosen patch similarity measurement to accurately capture the tissue/shape appearance of the anatomical structure. One major limitation of existing state-of-the-art label fusion methods is that they often apply a fixed size image patch throughout the entire label fusion procedure. Doing so may severely affect the fidelity of the patch similarity measurement, which in turn may not adequately capture complex tissue appearance patterns expressed by the anatomical structure. To address this limitation, we advance state-of-the-art by adding three new label fusion contributions: First, each image patch is now characterized by a multi-scale feature representation that encodes both local and semi-local image information. Doing so will increase the accuracy of the patch-based similarity measurement. Second, to limit the possibility of the patch-based similarity measurement being wrongly guided by the presence of multiple anatomical structures in the same image patch, each atlas image patch is further partitioned into a set of label-specific partial image patches according to the existing labels. Since image information has now been semantically divided into different patterns, these new label-specific atlas patches make the label fusion process more specific and flexible. Lastly, in order to correct target points that are mislabeled during label fusion, a hierarchical approach is used to improve the label fusion results. In particular, a coarse-to-fine iterative label fusion approach is used that gradually reduces the patch size. To evaluate the accuracy of our label fusion approach, the proposed method was used to segment the hippocampus in the ADNI dataset and 7.0 T MR images, sub-cortical regions in LONI LBPA40 dataset, mid-brain regions in SATA dataset from MICCAI 2013 segmentation challenge, and a set of key internal gray matter structures in IXI dataset. In all experiments, the segmentation results of the proposed hierarchical label fusion method with multi-scale feature representations and label-specific atlas patches are more accurate than several well-known state-of-the-art label fusion methods.
Copyright © 2014. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Label-specific patch partition; Multi-atlas based segmentation; Multi-scale feature representation; Patch-based labeling; Sparse representation

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25463474      PMCID: PMC4285661          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.11.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  24 in total

1.  Patch-based segmentation using expert priors: application to hippocampus and ventricle segmentation.

Authors:  Pierrick Coupé; José V Manjón; Vladimir Fonov; Jens Pruessner; Montserrat Robles; D Louis Collins
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-09-17       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Ensemble sparse classification of Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Manhua Liu; Daoqiang Zhang; Dinggang Shen
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2012-01-14       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Quantitative analysis of the hippocampus using images obtained from 7.0 T MRI.

Authors:  Zang-Hee Cho; Jae-Yong Han; Seok-Il Hwang; Dae-shik Kim; Kyoung-Nam Kim; Nam-Beom Kim; Seog Ju Kim; Je-Geun Chi; Chan-Woong Park; Young-Bo Kim
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Formulating spatially varying performance in the statistical fusion framework.

Authors:  Andrew J Asman; Bennett A Landman
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2012-03-15       Impact factor: 10.048

5.  A supervised patch-based approach for human brain labeling.

Authors:  Françcois Rousseau; Piotr A Habas; Colin Studholme
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2011-05-19       Impact factor: 10.048

6.  N4ITK: improved N3 bias correction.

Authors:  Nicholas J Tustison; Brian B Avants; Philip A Cook; Yuanjie Zheng; Alexander Egan; Paul A Yushkevich; James C Gee
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2010-04-08       Impact factor: 10.048

7.  A generative model for image segmentation based on label fusion.

Authors:  Mert R Sabuncu; B T Thomas Yeo; Koen Van Leemput; Bruce Fischl; Polina Golland
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2010-06-17       Impact factor: 10.048

8.  Robust statistical label fusion through COnsensus Level, Labeler Accuracy, and Truth Estimation (COLLATE).

Authors:  Andrew J Asman; Bennett A Landman
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2011-04-29       Impact factor: 10.048

9.  LABEL: pediatric brain extraction using learning-based meta-algorithm.

Authors:  Feng Shi; Li Wang; Yakang Dai; John H Gilmore; Weili Lin; Dinggang Shen
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2012-05-24       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Nearly automatic segmentation of hippocampal subfields in in vivo focal T2-weighted MRI.

Authors:  Paul A Yushkevich; Hongzhi Wang; John Pluta; Sandhitsu R Das; Caryne Craige; Brian B Avants; Michael W Weiner; Susanne Mueller
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-06-30       Impact factor: 6.556

View more
  24 in total

1.  Metric Learning for Multi-atlas based Segmentation of Hippocampus.

Authors:  Hancan Zhu; Hewei Cheng; Xuesong Yang; Yong Fan
Journal:  Neuroinformatics       Date:  2017-01

Review 2.  Baby brain atlases.

Authors:  Kenichi Oishi; Linda Chang; Hao Huang
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2018-04-03       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Automated Segmentation of Tissues Using CT and MRI: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Leon Lenchik; Laura Heacock; Ashley A Weaver; Robert D Boutin; Tessa S Cook; Jason Itri; Christopher G Filippi; Rao P Gullapalli; James Lee; Marianna Zagurovskaya; Tara Retson; Kendra Godwin; Joey Nicholson; Ponnada A Narayana
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2019-08-10       Impact factor: 3.173

4.  BrainSegNet: a convolutional neural network architecture for automated segmentation of human brain structures.

Authors:  Raghav Mehta; Aabhas Majumdar; Jayanthi Sivaswamy
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2017-04-20

Review 5.  Recent publications from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative: Reviewing progress toward improved AD clinical trials.

Authors:  Michael W Weiner; Dallas P Veitch; Paul S Aisen; Laurel A Beckett; Nigel J Cairns; Robert C Green; Danielle Harvey; Clifford R Jack; William Jagust; John C Morris; Ronald C Petersen; Andrew J Saykin; Leslie M Shaw; Arthur W Toga; John Q Trojanowski
Journal:  Alzheimers Dement       Date:  2017-03-22       Impact factor: 21.566

6.  Patch-Based Label Fusion with Structured Discriminant Embedding for Hippocampus Segmentation.

Authors:  Yan Wang; Guangkai Ma; Xi Wu; Jiliu Zhou
Journal:  Neuroinformatics       Date:  2018-10

7.  Multi-Atlas Based Segmentation of Brainstem Nuclei from MR Images by Deep Hyper-Graph Learning.

Authors:  Pei Dong; Yangrong Guo; Yue Gao; Peipeng Liang; Yonghong Shi; Qian Wang; Dinggang Shen; Guorong Wu
Journal:  Patch Based Tech Med Imaging (2016)       Date:  2016-09-22

8.  Brain Atlas Fusion from High-Thickness Diagnostic Magnetic Resonance Images by Learning-Based Super-Resolution.

Authors:  Jinpeng Zhang; Lichi Zhang; Lei Xiang; Yeqin Shao; Guorong Wu; Xiaodong Zhou; Dinggang Shen; Qian Wang
Journal:  Pattern Recognit       Date:  2016-09-29       Impact factor: 7.740

9.  Robust multi-atlas label propagation by deep sparse representation.

Authors:  Chen Zu; Zhengxia Wang; Daoqiang Zhang; Peipeng Liang; Yonghong Shi; Dinggang Shen; Guorong Wu
Journal:  Pattern Recognit       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 7.740

10.  State-space model with deep learning for functional dynamics estimation in resting-state fMRI.

Authors:  Heung-Il Suk; Chong-Yaw Wee; Seong-Whan Lee; Dinggang Shen
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2016-01-14       Impact factor: 6.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.