Literature DB >> 25460227

Test driving ToxCast: endocrine profiling for 1858 chemicals included in phase II.

Dayne Filer1, Heather B Patisaul, Thaddeus Schug, David Reif, Kristina Thayer.   

Abstract

Identifying chemicals, beyond those already implicated, to test for potential endocrine disruption is a challenge and high throughput approaches have emerged as a potential tool for this type of screening. This review focused the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) ToxCast(TM) high throughput in vitro screening (HTS) program. Utility for identifying compounds was assessed and reviewed by using it to run the recently expanded chemical library (from 309 compounds to 1858) through the ToxPi(TM) prioritization scheme for endocrine disruption. The analysis included metabolic and neuroendocrine targets. This investigative approach simultaneously assessed the utility of ToxCast, and helped identify novel chemicals which may have endocrine activity. Results from this exercise suggest the spectrum of environmental chemicals with potential endocrine activity is much broader than indicated, and that some aspects of endocrine disruption are not fully covered in ToxCast.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25460227      PMCID: PMC4297520          DOI: 10.1016/j.coph.2014.09.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Pharmacol        ISSN: 1471-4892            Impact factor:   5.547


  12 in total

1.  Endocrine-disrupting chemicals and public health protection: a statement of principles from The Endocrine Society.

Authors:  R Thomas Zoeller; T R Brown; L L Doan; A C Gore; N E Skakkebaek; A M Soto; T J Woodruff; F S Vom Saal
Journal:  Endocrinology       Date:  2012-06-25       Impact factor: 4.736

2.  Defining estrogenic mechanisms of bisphenol A analogs through high throughput microscopy-based contextual assays.

Authors:  Fabio Stossi; Michael J Bolt; Felicity J Ashcroft; Jane E Lamerdin; Jonathan S Melnick; Reid T Powell; Radhika D Dandekar; Maureen G Mancini; Cheryl L Walker; John K Westwick; Michael A Mancini
Journal:  Chem Biol       Date:  2014-05-22

3.  Meta-analysis of toxicity and teratogenicity of 133 chemicals from zebrafish developmental toxicity studies.

Authors:  Nicole A Ducharme; Leif E Peterson; Emilio Benfenati; David Reif; Catherine W McCollum; Jan-Åke Gustafsson; Maria Bondesson
Journal:  Reprod Toxicol       Date:  2013-06-22       Impact factor: 3.143

4.  Assessment of beating parameters in human induced pluripotent stem cells enables quantitative in vitro screening for cardiotoxicity.

Authors:  Oksana Sirenko; Evan F Cromwell; Carole Crittenden; Jessica A Wignall; Fred A Wright; Ivan Rusyn
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 4.219

5.  In vitro screening of environmental chemicals for targeted testing prioritization: the ToxCast project.

Authors:  Richard S Judson; Keith A Houck; Robert J Kavlock; Thomas B Knudsen; Matthew T Martin; Holly M Mortensen; David M Reif; Daniel M Rotroff; Imran Shah; Ann M Richard; David J Dix
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 9.031

6.  Endocrine profiling and prioritization of environmental chemicals using ToxCast data.

Authors:  David M Reif; Matthew T Martin; Shirlee W Tan; Keith A Houck; Richard S Judson; Ann M Richard; Thomas B Knudsen; David J Dix; Robert J Kavlock
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2010-09-08       Impact factor: 9.031

7.  The Matthew effect in environmental science publication: a bibliometric analysis of chemical substances in journal articles.

Authors:  Philippe Grandjean; Mette L Eriksen; Ole Ellegaard; Johan A Wallin
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2011-11-10       Impact factor: 5.984

Review 8.  Aggregating data for computational toxicology applications: The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Aggregated Computational Toxicology Resource (ACToR) System.

Authors:  Richard S Judson; Matthew T Martin; Peter Egeghy; Sumit Gangwal; David M Reif; Parth Kothiya; Maritja Wolf; Tommy Cathey; Thomas Transue; Doris Smith; James Vail; Alicia Frame; Shad Mosher; Elaine A Cohen Hubal; Ann M Richard
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2012-02-09       Impact factor: 6.208

9.  ToxPi GUI: an interactive visualization tool for transparent integration of data from diverse sources of evidence.

Authors:  David M Reif; Myroslav Sypa; Eric F Lock; Fred A Wright; Ander Wilson; Tommy Cathey; Richard R Judson; Ivan Rusyn
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2012-11-29       Impact factor: 6.931

Review 10.  The toxicity data landscape for environmental chemicals.

Authors:  Richard Judson; Ann Richard; David J Dix; Keith Houck; Matthew Martin; Robert Kavlock; Vicki Dellarco; Tala Henry; Todd Holderman; Philip Sayre; Shirlee Tan; Thomas Carpenter; Edwin Smith
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2008-12-22       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  31 in total

1.  Moving Toward Integrating Gene Expression Profiling Into High-Throughput Testing: A Gene Expression Biomarker Accurately Predicts Estrogen Receptor α Modulation in a Microarray Compendium.

Authors:  Natalia Ryan; Brian Chorley; Raymond R Tice; Richard Judson; J Christopher Corton
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2016-02-10       Impact factor: 4.849

2.  Screening for angiogenic inhibitors in zebrafish to evaluate a predictive model for developmental vascular toxicity.

Authors:  Tamara Tal; Claire Kilty; Andrew Smith; Carlie LaLone; Brendán Kennedy; Alan Tennant; Catherine W McCollum; Maria Bondesson; Thomas Knudsen; Stephanie Padilla; Nicole Kleinstreuer
Journal:  Reprod Toxicol       Date:  2016-12-19       Impact factor: 3.143

3.  Differentiating Pathway-Specific From Nonspecific Effects in High-Throughput Toxicity Data: A Foundation for Prioritizing Adverse Outcome Pathway Development.

Authors:  Kellie A Fay; Daniel L Villeneuve; Joe Swintek; Stephen W Edwards; Mark D Nelms; Brett R Blackwell; Gerald T Ankley
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 4.  Endocrine-disrupting chemicals: economic, regulatory, and policy implications.

Authors:  Christopher D Kassotis; Laura N Vandenberg; Barbara A Demeneix; Miquel Porta; Remy Slama; Leonardo Trasande
Journal:  Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 32.069

5.  Identification of nonmonotonic concentration-responses in Tox21 high-throughput screening estrogen receptor assays.

Authors:  Zhenzhen Shi; Menghang Xia; Shuo Xiao; Qiang Zhang
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  2022-08-19       Impact factor: 4.460

Review 6.  Animal models of endocrine disruption.

Authors:  Heather B Patisaul; Suzanne E Fenton; David Aylor
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2018-04-06       Impact factor: 4.690

7.  Identification of Androgen Receptor Modulators in a Prostate Cancer Cell Line Microarray Compendium.

Authors:  John P Rooney; Brian Chorley; Nicole Kleinstreuer; J Christopher Corton
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 4.849

8.  Utilizing a Biology-Driven Approach to Map the Exposome in Health and Disease: An Essential Investment to Drive the Next Generation of Environmental Discovery.

Authors:  Ming Kei Chung; Stephen M Rappaport; Craig E Wheelock; Vy Kim Nguyen; Thomas P van der Meer; Gary W Miller; Roel Vermeulen; Chirag J Patel
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2021-08-26       Impact factor: 9.031

9.  Identifying adipogenic chemicals: Disparate effects in 3T3-L1, OP9 and primary mesenchymal multipotent cell models.

Authors:  Faye V Andrews; Stephanie M Kim; Lariah Edwards; Jennifer J Schlezinger
Journal:  Toxicol In Vitro       Date:  2020-05-28       Impact factor: 3.685

Review 10.  Agrochemicals with estrogenic endocrine disrupting properties: Lessons Learned?

Authors:  Laura N Vandenberg; Aimal Najmi; Joshua P Mogus
Journal:  Mol Cell Endocrinol       Date:  2020-05-12       Impact factor: 4.369

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.