Literature DB >> 35988584

Identification of nonmonotonic concentration-responses in Tox21 high-throughput screening estrogen receptor assays.

Zhenzhen Shi1, Menghang Xia2, Shuo Xiao3, Qiang Zhang4.   

Abstract

Environmental endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs) interfere with the metabolism and actions of endogenous hormones. It has been well documented in numerous in vivo and in vitro studies that EDCs can exhibit nonmonotonic dose response (NMDR) behaviors. Not conforming to the conventional linear or linear-no-threshold response paradigm, these NMDR relationships pose practical challenges to the risk assessment of EDCs. In the meantime, the endocrine signaling pathways and biological mechanisms underpinning NMDR remain incompletely understood. The US Tox21 program has conducted in vitro cell-based high-throughput screening assays for estrogen receptors (ER), androgen receptors, and other nuclear receptors, and screened the 10 K-compound library for potential endocrine activities. Using 15 concentrations across several orders of magnitude of concentration range and run in both agonist and antagonist modes, these Tox21 assay datasets contain valuable quantitative information that can be explored to evaluate the nonlinear effects of EDCs and may infer potential mechanisms. In this study we analyzed the concentration-response curves (CRCs) in all 8 Tox21 ERα and ERβ assays by developing clustering and classification algorithms customized to the datasets to identify various shapes of CRCs. After excluding NMDR curves likely caused by cytotoxicity, luciferase inhibition, or autofluorescence, hundreds of compounds were identified to exhibit Bell or U-shaped CRCs. Bell-shaped CRCs are about 7 times more frequent than U-shaped ones in the Tox21 ER assays. Many compounds exhibit NMDR in at least one assay, and some EDCs well-known for their NMDRs in the literature were also identified, suggesting their nonmonotonic effects may originate at cellular levels involving transcriptional ER signaling. The developed computational methods for NMDR identification in ER assays can be adapted and applied to other high-throughput bioassays.
Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Agonist; Antagonist; Endocrine-Disrupting Chemicals; Estrogen Receptor; Nonmonotonic Dose Response; Tox21

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35988584      PMCID: PMC9452481          DOI: 10.1016/j.taap.2022.116206

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol        ISSN: 0041-008X            Impact factor:   4.460


  64 in total

Review 1.  Thyroid effects of endocrine disrupting chemicals.

Authors:  Malene Boas; Ulla Feldt-Rasmussen; Katharina M Main
Journal:  Mol Cell Endocrinol       Date:  2011-09-10       Impact factor: 4.102

2.  Quantitative high-throughput screening: a titration-based approach that efficiently identifies biological activities in large chemical libraries.

Authors:  James Inglese; Douglas S Auld; Ajit Jadhav; Ronald L Johnson; Anton Simeonov; Adam Yasgar; Wei Zheng; Christopher P Austin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-07-24       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Endocrine disruptors in the etiology of type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Paloma Alonso-Magdalena; Ivan Quesada; Angel Nadal
Journal:  Nat Rev Endocrinol       Date:  2011-04-05       Impact factor: 43.330

4.  Exposure to endocrine-disrupting chemicals in the USA: a population-based disease burden and cost analysis.

Authors:  Teresa M Attina; Russ Hauser; Sheela Sathyanarayana; Patricia A Hunt; Jean-Pierre Bourguignon; John Peterson Myers; Joseph DiGangi; R Thomas Zoeller; Leonardo Trasande
Journal:  Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol       Date:  2016-10-17       Impact factor: 32.069

5.  CLARITY-BPA Core Study: Analysis for non-monotonic dose-responses and biological relevance.

Authors:  Melissa A Badding; Leila Barraj; Amy L Williams; Carolyn Scrafford; Richard Reiss
Journal:  Food Chem Toxicol       Date:  2019-06-15       Impact factor: 6.023

Review 6.  Evaluating the evidence for non-monotonic dose-response relationships: A systematic literature review and (re-)analysis of in vivo toxicity data in the area of food safety.

Authors:  C Varret; A Beronius; L Bodin; B G H Bokkers; P E Boon; M Burger; L De Wit-Bos; A Fischer; A Hanberg; S Litens-Karlsson; W Slob; G Wolterink; J Zilliacus; C Beausoleil; C Rousselle
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  2017-11-24       Impact factor: 4.219

7.  Examining the evidence of non-monotonic dose-response in Androgen Receptor agonism high-throughput screening assay.

Authors:  Kyrylo Klimenko
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  2020-11-18       Impact factor: 4.219

8.  Burden of disease and costs of exposure to endocrine disrupting chemicals in the European Union: an updated analysis.

Authors:  L Trasande; R T Zoeller; U Hass; A Kortenkamp; P Grandjean; J P Myers; J DiGangi; P M Hunt; R Rudel; S Sathyanarayana; M Bellanger; R Hauser; J Legler; N E Skakkebaek; J J Heindel
Journal:  Andrology       Date:  2016-03-22       Impact factor: 3.842

9.  Profiling of the Tox21 10K compound library for agonists and antagonists of the estrogen receptor alpha signaling pathway.

Authors:  Ruili Huang; Srilatha Sakamuru; Matt T Martin; David M Reif; Richard S Judson; Keith A Houck; Warren Casey; Jui-Hua Hsieh; Keith R Shockley; Patricia Ceger; Jennifer Fostel; Kristine L Witt; Weida Tong; Daniel M Rotroff; Tongan Zhao; Paul Shinn; Anton Simeonov; David J Dix; Christopher P Austin; Robert J Kavlock; Raymond R Tice; Menghang Xia
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2014-07-11       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 10.  Big data in chemical toxicity research: the use of high-throughput screening assays to identify potential toxicants.

Authors:  Hao Zhu; Jun Zhang; Marlene T Kim; Abena Boison; Alexander Sedykh; Kimberlee Moran
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2014-09-16       Impact factor: 3.739

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.