Literature DB >> 25454005

Respondent-driven sampling for an adolescent health study in vulnerable urban settings: a multi-country study.

Michele R Decker1, Beth Dail Marshall2, Mark Emerson2, Amanda Kalamar2, Laura Covarrubias2, Nan Astone3, Ziliang Wang4, Ersheng Gao4, Lawrence Mashimbye5, Sinead Delany-Moretlwe5, Rajib Acharya6, Adesola Olumide7, Oladosu Ojengbede7, Robert W Blum2, Freya L Sonenstein2.   

Abstract

The global adolescent population is larger than ever before and is rapidly urbanizing. Global surveillance systems to monitor youth health typically use household- and school-based recruitment methods. These systems risk not reaching the most marginalized youth made vulnerable by conditions of migration, civil conflict, and other forms of individual and structural vulnerability. We describe the methodology of the Well-Being of Adolescents in Vulnerable Environments survey, which used respondent-driven sampling (RDS) to recruit male and female youth aged 15-19 years and living in economically distressed urban settings in Baltimore, MD; Johannesburg, South Africa; Ibadan, Nigeria; New Delhi, India; and Shanghai, China (migrant youth only) for a cross-sectional study. We describe a shared recruitment and survey administration protocol across the five sites, present recruitment parameters, and illustrate challenges and necessary adaptations for use of RDS with youth in disadvantaged urban settings. We describe the reach of RDS into populations of youth who may be missed by traditional household- and school-based sampling. Across all sites, an estimated 9.6% were unstably housed; among those enrolled in school, absenteeism was pervasive with 29% having missed over 6 days of school in the past month. Overall findings confirm the feasibility, efficiency, and utility of RDS in quickly reaching diverse samples of youth, including those both in and out of school and those unstably housed, and provide direction for optimizing RDS methods with this population. In our rapidly urbanizing global landscape with an unprecedented youth population, RDS may serve as a valuable tool in complementing existing household- and school-based methods for health-related surveillance that can guide policy.
Copyright © 2014 Society for Adolescent Health and Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adolescent health; Gender differences; Respondent-driven sampling

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25454005      PMCID: PMC4443701          DOI: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2014.07.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Adolesc Health        ISSN: 1054-139X            Impact factor:   5.012


  24 in total

1.  A comparative analysis of the use of maternal health services between teenagers and older mothers in sub-Saharan Africa: evidence from Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS).

Authors:  Monica Akinyi Magadi; Alfred O Agwanda; Francis O Obare
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2006-12-14       Impact factor: 4.634

2.  Adolescents' use of maternal and child health services in developing countries.

Authors:  Heidi W Reynolds; Emelita L Wong; Heidi Tucker
Journal:  Int Fam Plan Perspect       Date:  2006-03

3.  Implementation challenges to using respondent-driven sampling methodology for HIV biological and behavioral surveillance: field experiences in international settings.

Authors:  Lisa Grazina Johnston; Mohsen Malekinejad; Carl Kendall; Irene M Iuppa; George W Rutherford
Journal:  AIDS Behav       Date:  2008-06-06

4.  Female sex workers in three cities in Russia: HIV prevalence, risk factors and experience with targeted HIV prevention.

Authors:  Michele R Decker; Andrea L Wirtz; Vladimir Moguilnyi; Alena Peryshkina; Maria Ostrovskaya; Marina Nikita; Julia Kuznetzova; Chris Beyrer
Journal:  AIDS Behav       Date:  2014-03

5.  Recruiting injection drug users: a three-site comparison of results and experiences with respondent-driven and targeted sampling procedures.

Authors:  William T Robinson; Jan M H Risser; Shanell McGoy; Adam B Becker; Hafeez Rehman; Mary Jefferson; Vivian Griffin; Marcia Wolverton; Stephanie Tortu
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 3.671

6.  Audio computer assisted self interview and face to face interview modes in assessing response bias among STD clinic patients.

Authors:  K G Ghanem; H E Hutton; J M Zenilman; R Zimba; E J Erbelding
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.519

Review 7.  The reporting of sensitive behavior by adolescents: a methodological experiment in Kenya.

Authors:  Barbara S Mensch; Paul C Hewett; Annabel S Erulkar
Journal:  Demography       Date:  2003-05

8.  Differences in young people's reports of sexual behaviors according to interview methodology: a randomized trial in India.

Authors:  Michelle J Hindin; Saifuddin Ahmed
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2007-11-29       Impact factor: 9.308

9.  Closing the gap in a generation: health equity through action on the social determinants of health.

Authors:  Michael Marmot; Sharon Friel; Ruth Bell; Tanja A J Houweling; Sebastian Taylor
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2008-11-08       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Application of respondent driven sampling to collect baseline data on FSWs and MSM for HIV risk reduction interventions in two urban centres in Papua New Guinea.

Authors:  William Yeka; Geraldine Maibani-Michie; Dimitri Prybylski; Donn Colby
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 3.671

View more
  18 in total

1.  Alcohol Consumption, Risky Sexual Behaviors, and HIV in Nigeria: A Meta-Analytic Review.

Authors:  Uzoamaka J Okoro; Kate B Carey; Blair T Johnson; Michael P Carey; Lori A J Scott-Sheldon
Journal:  Curr Drug Res Rev       Date:  2019

2.  Recruiting the social contacts of patients with STI for HIV screening in Lilongwe, Malawi: process evaluation and assessment of acceptability.

Authors:  Nora E Rosenberg; Christopher C Stanley; Sarah E Rutstein; Naomi Bonongwe; Gift Kamanga; Audrey Pettifor; Clement Mapanje; Francis Martinson; Irving F Hoffman; William C Miller
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2016-05-13       Impact factor: 3.519

3.  Implementation of respondent driven sampling in Nairobi, Kenya, for tracking key family planning indicators among adolescents and youth: lessons learnt.

Authors:  Mary Thiongo; Peter Gichangi; Patrick K Macho; Meagan E Byrne; Peter Kimani; Michael Waithaka; Scott Radloff; Philip Anglewicz; Michele R Decker
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2022-06-07

4.  Who Adolescents Trust May Impact Their Health: Findings from Baltimore.

Authors:  Kristin Mmari; Beth Marshall; Hannah Lantos; Robert Wm Blum
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 3.671

5.  Community Engagement and Venue-Based Sampling in Adolescent Male Sexually Transmitted Infection Prevention Research.

Authors:  Mary A Ott; Julianne Campbell; Teresa M Imburgia; Ziyi Yang; Wanzhu Tu; Colette L Auerswald
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 5.012

6.  Risk and Protective Factors Associated with Adolescent Food Insecurity in Baltimore.

Authors:  Kristin Mmari; Anne Smith; Susan Gross; Beth Marshall
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2020-10-22       Impact factor: 3.671

7.  An evaluation of assumptions underlying respondent-driven sampling and the social contexts of sexual and gender minority youth participating in HIV clinical trials in the United States.

Authors:  Andrea L Wirtz; Jessica R Iyer; Durryle Brooks; Kimberly Hailey-Fair; Noya Galai; Chris Beyrer; David Celentano; Renata Arrington-Sanders
Journal:  J Int AIDS Soc       Date:  2021-05       Impact factor: 5.396

8.  A mixed methods study to examine the influence of the neighborhood social context on adolescent health service utilization.

Authors:  Kristin Mmari; Beth Marshall; Trevor Hsu; Ji Won Shon; Amenze Eguavoen
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2016-08-24       Impact factor: 2.655

9.  Potential and Challenges in Collecting Social and Behavioral Data on Adolescent Alcohol Norms: Comparing Respondent-Driven Sampling and Web-Based Respondent-Driven Sampling.

Authors:  Janina Hildebrand; Sharyn Burns; Yun Zhao; Roanna Lobo; Peter Howat; Steve Allsop; Bruce Maycock
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2015-12-24       Impact factor: 5.428

10.  The Influence of the Family on Adolescent Sexual Experience: A Comparison between Baltimore and Johannesburg.

Authors:  Kristin Mmari; Amanda M Kalamar; Heena Brahmbhatt; Emilie Venables
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-11-07       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.