OBJECTIVES: To explore acceptability of recruiting social contacts for HIV and sexually transmitted infection (STI) screening in Lilongwe, Malawi. METHODS: In this observational study, three groups of 'seed' patients were enrolled: 45 HIV-infected patients with STI, 45 HIV-uninfected patients with STI and 45 community controls, who were also tested for HIV as part of the study. Each seed was given five coupons and asked to recruit up to five social contacts to the STI clinic. Seeds were told the programme for contacts would include HIV testing, STI screening and general health promotion. Seeds were asked to return after 1 month to report on the contact recruitment process. Seeds received $2 for each successfully recruited contact. RESULTS: Eighty-nine seeds (66%) returned for 1-month follow-up with no difference between the three seed groups (p=0.9). Returning seeds reported distributing most of their coupons (mean=4.1) and discussing each feature of the programme with most contacts-HIV testing (90%), STI screening (87%) and health promotion (91%). Seeds reported discussing their own HIV status with most contacts (52%), with a lower proportion of HIV-infected seeds discussing their HIV status (22%) than HIV-uninfected seeds (81%) or community seeds (64%) (p<0.001). Contact recruitment did not vary with socioeconomic status. CONCLUSIONS: Most seeds distributed all coupons and reported describing all aspects of the programme to most contacts. Patients with STI are able to act as health promoters within their social networks and may be a critical link to increasing STI and HIV status awareness among high-risk groups. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/.
OBJECTIVES: To explore acceptability of recruiting social contacts for HIV and sexually transmitted infection (STI) screening in Lilongwe, Malawi. METHODS: In this observational study, three groups of 'seed' patients were enrolled: 45 HIV-infectedpatients with STI, 45 HIV-uninfectedpatients with STI and 45 community controls, who were also tested for HIV as part of the study. Each seed was given five coupons and asked to recruit up to five social contacts to the STI clinic. Seeds were told the programme for contacts would include HIV testing, STI screening and general health promotion. Seeds were asked to return after 1 month to report on the contact recruitment process. Seeds received $2 for each successfully recruited contact. RESULTS: Eighty-nine seeds (66%) returned for 1-month follow-up with no difference between the three seed groups (p=0.9). Returning seeds reported distributing most of their coupons (mean=4.1) and discussing each feature of the programme with most contacts-HIV testing (90%), STI screening (87%) and health promotion (91%). Seeds reported discussing their own HIV status with most contacts (52%), with a lower proportion of HIV-infected seeds discussing their HIV status (22%) than HIV-uninfected seeds (81%) or community seeds (64%) (p<0.001). Contact recruitment did not vary with socioeconomic status. CONCLUSIONS: Most seeds distributed all coupons and reported describing all aspects of the programme to most contacts. Patients with STI are able to act as health promoters within their social networks and may be a critical link to increasing STI and HIV status awareness among high-risk groups. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/.
Entities:
Keywords:
AFRICA; HIV; PREVENTION; SEXUAL NETWORKS; SOCIAL SCIENCE
Authors: Lisa W Kimbrough; Holly E Fisher; Kenneth T Jones; Wayne Johnson; Sekhar Thadiparthi; Samuel Dooley Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2009-04-16 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Stephen M Kimani; Melissa H Watt; M Giovanna Merli; Donald Skinner; Bronwyn Myers; Desiree Pieterse; Jessica C MacFarlane; Christina S Meade Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2014-08-02 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Michele R Decker; Beth Dail Marshall; Mark Emerson; Amanda Kalamar; Laura Covarrubias; Nan Astone; Ziliang Wang; Ersheng Gao; Lawrence Mashimbye; Sinead Delany-Moretlwe; Rajib Acharya; Adesola Olumide; Oladosu Ojengbede; Robert W Blum; Freya L Sonenstein Journal: J Adolesc Health Date: 2014-11-19 Impact factor: 5.012
Authors: Christina P Lindan; Andrew Anglemyer; Wolfgang Hladik; Joseph Barker; George Lubwama; George Rutherford; John Ssenkusu; Alex Opio; James Campbell Journal: Int J STD AIDS Date: 2014-06-26 Impact factor: 1.359
Authors: Rassul Nalá; Beverley Cummings; Roberta Horth; Celso Inguane; Marcos Benedetti; Marcos Chissano; Isabel Sathane; Peter Young; Danilo da Silva; Joy Mirjahangir; Mike Grasso; H Fisher Raymond; Willi McFarland; Tim Lane Journal: AIDS Behav Date: 2015-02
Authors: Ivy Mannoh; Danielle Amundsen; Gnilane Turpin; Carrie E Lyons; Nikita Viswasam; Elizabeth Hahn; Sofia Ryan; Stefan Baral; Bhakti Hansoti Journal: AIDS Behav Date: 2021-11-19