Literature DB >> 25451733

Quantifying the burden of complications following total pancreatectomy using the postoperative morbidity index: a multi-institutional perspective.

Jashodeep Datta1, Russell S Lewis, Steven M Strasberg, Bruce L Hall, John D Allendorf, Joal D Beane, Stephen W Behrman, Mark P Callery, John D Christein, Jeffrey A Drebin, Irene Epelboym, Jin He, Henry A Pitt, Emily Winslow, Christopher Wolfgang, Major K Lee, Charles M Vollmer.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: While contemporary studies demonstrate decreasing complication rates following total pancreatectomy (TP), none have quantified the impact of post-TP complications. The Postoperative Morbidity Index (PMI)-a quantitative measure of postoperative morbidity-combines ACS-NSQIP complication data with severity weighting derived from Modified Accordion Grading System. We establish the PMI for TP in a multi-institutional cohort.
METHODS: Nine institutions contributed ACS-NSQIP data for 64 TPs (2005-2011). Each complication was assigned an Accordion severity weight ranging from 0.110 (grade 1/mild) to 1.00 (grade 6/death). PMI equals the sum of complication severity weights ("Total Burden") divided by total number of patients.
RESULTS: Overall, 29 patients (45.3 %) suffered 55 ACS-NSQIP complications; 15 (23.4 %) had >1 complication. Thirteen patients (20.3 %) were readmitted and one death (1.6 %) occurred within 30 days. Non-risk adjusted PMI was 0.151, while PMI for complication-bearing cases rose to 0.333. Bleeding/Transfusion and Sepsis were the most common complications. Discordance between frequency and burden of complications was observed. While grades 4-6 comprised only 18.5 % of complications, they contributed 37.1 % to the series' total burden.
CONCLUSION: This multi-institutional series is the first to quantify the complication burden following TP using the rigor of ACS-NSQIP. A PMI of 0.151 indicates that, collectively, patients undergoing TP have an average burden of complications in the mild to moderate severity range, although complication-bearing patients have a considerable reduction in health utility.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25451733     DOI: 10.1007/s11605-014-2706-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg        ISSN: 1091-255X            Impact factor:   3.452


  24 in total

1.  TOTAL PANCREATECTOMY FOR CARCINOMA : CASE REPORT.

Authors:  E W Rockey
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1943-10       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 2.  Blueprint for a new American College of Surgeons: National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.

Authors:  John D Birkmeyer; David M Shahian; Justin B Dimick; Samuel R G Finlayson; David R Flum; Clifford Y Ko; Bruce Lee Hall
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2008-09-19       Impact factor: 6.113

3.  Total pancreatectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma: evaluation of morbidity and long-term survival.

Authors:  Sushanth Reddy; Christopher L Wolfgang; John L Cameron; Frederic Eckhauser; Michael A Choti; Richard D Schulick; Barish H Edil; Timothy M Pawlik
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Establishing a quantitative benchmark for morbidity in pancreatoduodenectomy using ACS-NSQIP, the Accordion Severity Grading System, and the Postoperative Morbidity Index.

Authors:  Charles M Vollmer; Russell S Lewis; Bruce L Hall; John D Allendorf; Joal D Beane; Stephen W Behrman; Mark P Callery; John D Christein; Jeffrey A Drebin; Irene Epelboym; Jin He; Henry A Pitt; Emily Winslow; Christopher Wolfgang; Steven M Strasberg
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Defining the post-operative morbidity index for distal pancreatectomy.

Authors:  Major K Lee; Russell S Lewis; Steven M Strasberg; Bruce L Hall; John D Allendorf; Joal D Beane; Stephen W Behrman; Mark P Callery; John D Christein; Jeffrey A Drebin; Irene Epelboym; Jin He; Henry A Pitt; Emily Winslow; Christopher Wolfgang; Charles M Vollmer
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2014-06-16       Impact factor: 3.647

6.  Routine drainage of the operative bed following elective distal pancreatectomy does not reduce the occurrence of complications.

Authors:  Stephen W Behrman; Ben L Zarzaur; Abhishek Parmar; Taylor S Riall; Bruce L Hall; Henry A Pitt
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2014-08-13       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  Low drain fluid amylase predicts absence of pancreatic fistula following pancreatectomy.

Authors:  Christina W Lee; Henry A Pitt; Taylor S Riall; Sean S Ronnekleiv-Kelly; Jacqueline S Israel; Glen E Leverson; Abhishek D Parmar; E Molly Kilbane; Bruce L Hall; Sharon M Weber
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2014-08-12       Impact factor: 3.452

8.  Postoperative morbidity index: a quantitative measure of severity of postoperative complications.

Authors:  Steven M Strasberg; Bruce L Hall
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2011-08-25       Impact factor: 6.113

9.  Does the use of neoadjuvant therapy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma increase postoperative morbidity and mortality rates?

Authors:  Amanda B Cooper; Abhishek D Parmar; Taylor S Riall; Bruce L Hall; Matthew H G Katz; Thomas A Aloia; Henry A Pitt
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2014-08-05       Impact factor: 3.452

10.  Results of resection for cancer of the exocrine pancreas: a study from the French Association of Surgery.

Authors:  H Baumel; M Huguier; J C Manderscheid; J M Fabre; S Houry; H Fagot
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 6.939

View more
  8 in total

1.  Outcomes of Simultaneous Major Liver Resection and Colorectal Surgery for Colorectal Liver Metastases.

Authors:  Paramin Muangkaew; Jai Young Cho; Ho-Seong Han; Yoo-Seok Yoon; YoungRok Choi; Jae Yool Jang; Hanlim Choi; Jae Seong Jang; Seong Uk Kwon
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2015-10-15       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  A novel risk scoring system reliably predicts readmission after pancreatectomy.

Authors:  Vicente Valero; Joshua C Grimm; Arman Kilic; Russell L Lewis; Jeffrey J Tosoian; Jin He; James F Griffin; John L Cameron; Matthew J Weiss; Charles M Vollmer; Christopher L Wolfgang
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2015-01-08       Impact factor: 6.113

Review 3.  Recent Advances in Pancreatic Cancer Surgery.

Authors:  Laura Maggino; Charles M Vollmer
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-12

4.  Total Pancreatectomy: Indications, Advantages and Disadvantages - A Review.

Authors:  Danilo Coco; Silvana Leanza; Francesco Guerra
Journal:  Maedica (Buchar)       Date:  2019-12

5.  Critical evaluation of quality of hepatopancreatic surgery in a medium-volume center in Finland using the Accordion Severity Grading System and the Postoperative Morbidity Index.

Authors:  Kyösti Tahkola; Ville Väyrynen; Ilmo Kellokumpu; Olli Helminen
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2020-08

Review 6.  Are there still indications for total pancreatectomy?

Authors:  Marco Del Chiaro; Elena Rangelova; Ralf Segersvärd; Urban Arnelo
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2016-09-07

7.  Prophylactic total pancreatectomy in individuals at high risk of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PROPAN): systematic review and shared decision-making programme using decision tables.

Authors:  Lianne Scholten; Anouk Ej Latenstein; Cora M Aalfs; Marco J Bruno; Olivier R Busch; Bert A Bonsing; Bas Groot Koerkamp; I Quintus Molenaar; Dirk T Ubbink; Jeanin E van Hooft; Paul Fockens; Jolanda Glas; J Hans DeVries; Marc G Besselink
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2020-07-23       Impact factor: 4.623

8.  Changes in postoperative long-term nutritional status and quality of life after total pancreatectomy.

Authors:  Moon Young Oh; Eun Joo Kim; Hongbeom Kim; Yoonhyeong Byun; Youngmin Han; Yoo Jin Choi; Jae Seung Kang; Wooil Kwon; Jin-Young Jang
Journal:  Ann Surg Treat Res       Date:  2021-03-30       Impact factor: 1.859

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.