BACKGROUND: Routine drainage of the operative bed following elective pancreatectomy remains controversial. Data specific to distal pancreatectomy (DP) have not been examined in a multi-institutional collaborative. METHODS: Data from the American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Pancreatectomy Demonstration Project were utilized. The impact of drain placement on development of pancreatectomy-related and overall morbidity were analyzed. Propensity scores for drain placement were calculated, and nearest neighbor matching was used to create a matched cohort. Groups were compared using bivariate and logistic regression analyses. RESULTS: Over 14 months, 761 patients undergoing DP were accrued; 606 were drained. Propensity score matching was possible in 116 patients. Drain and no drain groups were not different with respect to multiple preoperative and operative variables. All pancreatic fistulas (p < 0.01) and overall morbidity (p < 0.05) were more common in patients who received a drain. The placement of a drain did not reduce the incidence of clinically relevant pancreatic fistula nor the need for postoperative procedures. CONCLUSIONS: Placement of drains following elective distal pancreatectomy was associated with a higher overall morbidity and pancreatic fistulas. Drains did not reduce intra-abdominal septic morbidity, clinically relevant pancreatic fistulas, nor the need for postoperative therapeutic intervention.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Routine drainage of the operative bed following elective pancreatectomy remains controversial. Data specific to distal pancreatectomy (DP) have not been examined in a multi-institutional collaborative. METHODS: Data from the American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Pancreatectomy Demonstration Project were utilized. The impact of drain placement on development of pancreatectomy-related and overall morbidity were analyzed. Propensity scores for drain placement were calculated, and nearest neighbor matching was used to create a matched cohort. Groups were compared using bivariate and logistic regression analyses. RESULTS: Over 14 months, 761 patients undergoing DP were accrued; 606 were drained. Propensity score matching was possible in 116 patients. Drain and no drain groups were not different with respect to multiple preoperative and operative variables. All pancreatic fistulas (p < 0.01) and overall morbidity (p < 0.05) were more common in patients who received a drain. The placement of a drain did not reduce the incidence of clinically relevant pancreatic fistula nor the need for postoperative procedures. CONCLUSIONS: Placement of drains following elective distal pancreatectomy was associated with a higher overall morbidity and pancreatic fistulas. Drains did not reduce intra-abdominal septic morbidity, clinically relevant pancreatic fistulas, nor the need for postoperative therapeutic intervention.
Authors: Claudio Bassi; Enrico Molinari; Giuseppe Malleo; Stefano Crippa; Giovanni Butturini; Roberto Salvia; Giorgio Talamini; Paolo Pederzoli Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2010-08 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: William E Fisher; Sally E Hodges; Eric J Silberfein; Avo Artinyan; Charlotte H Ahern; Eunji Jo; F Charles Brunicardi Journal: HPB (Oxford) Date: 2011-07 Impact factor: 3.647
Authors: Abhishek D Parmar; Kristin M Sheffield; Gabriela M Vargas; Henry A Pitt; E Molly Kilbane; Bruce L Hall; Taylor S Riall Journal: HPB (Oxford) Date: 2013-07-22 Impact factor: 3.647
Authors: Camilo Correa-Gallego; Murray F Brennan; Michael Dʼangelica; Yuman Fong; Ronald P Dematteo; T Peter Kingham; William R Jarnagin; Peter J Allen Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2013-12 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: George Van Buren; Mark Bloomston; Steven J Hughes; Jordan Winter; Stephen W Behrman; Nicholas J Zyromski; Charles Vollmer; Vic Velanovich; Taylor Riall; Peter Muscarella; Jose Trevino; Attila Nakeeb; C Max Schmidt; Kevin Behrns; E Christopher Ellison; Omar Barakat; Kyle A Perry; Jeffrey Drebin; Michael House; Sherif Abdel-Misih; Eric J Silberfein; Steven Goldin; Kimberly Brown; Somala Mohammed; Sally E Hodges; Amy McElhany; Mehdi Issazadeh; Eunji Jo; Qianxing Mo; William E Fisher Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2014-04 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Eugene P Ceppa; Robert M McCurdy; David C Becerra; E Molly Kilbane; Nicholas J Zyromski; Attila Nakeeb; C Max Schmidt; Keith D Lillemoe; Henry A Pitt; Michael G House Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2015-04-23 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Jashodeep Datta; Russell S Lewis; Steven M Strasberg; Bruce L Hall; John D Allendorf; Joal D Beane; Stephen W Behrman; Mark P Callery; John D Christein; Jeffrey A Drebin; Irene Epelboym; Jin He; Henry A Pitt; Emily Winslow; Christopher Wolfgang; Major K Lee; Charles M Vollmer Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2014-12-02 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Christopher B Nahm; Philip R de Reuver; Thomas J Hugh; Andrew Pearson; Anthony J Gill; Jaswinder S Samra; Anubhav Mittal Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2017-03-20 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Joal D Beane; Michael G House; Susan C Pitt; E Molly Kilbane; Bruce L Hall; Abishek D Parmar; Taylor S Riall; Henry A Pitt Journal: HPB (Oxford) Date: 2015-07-22 Impact factor: 3.647
Authors: Filip Čečka; Martin Loveček; Bohumil Jon; Pavel Skalický; Zdeněk Šubrt; Čestmír Neoral; Alexander Ferko Journal: World J Gastroenterol Date: 2015-10-28 Impact factor: 5.742