BACKGROUND: Hepatopancreatobiliary surgery is prone to complications. Methods are needed to monitor surgical outcomes and enable comparison between institutions. METHODS: Complications were collected prospectively and reviewed using the modified Accordion Severity Grading System (MASGS) and the Postoperative Morbidity Index (PMI). RESULTS: This study included 527 consecutive patients receiving either pancreatic or liver resection in 2000-2017 in Central Finland Central Hospital. The PMI was 0.177 for all patients, and 0.192, 0.094, 0.285, and 0.129 for patients receiving major pancreatic (n=218), minor pancreatic (n=93), major liver (n=73), and minor liver (n=143) resection, respectively. The rates of postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) after pancreaticoduodenectomies (n=200) were 6.5% for grade B and 5.5% for grade C; rates for biliary leak were 1.0% (grade A), 2.5% (grade B), and 0.5% (grade C). Similarly, the rates for delayed gastric emptying (DGE) were 2.8% (grade A), 15.6% (grade B), and 3.7% (grade C). Postoperative hepatic dysfunction occurred in 2.3%, major surgical site bleeding in 2.3%, and biloma in 7.9% of patients after liver resection. Ninety-day mortality rates were 3.7% and 1.1% in major and minor pancreatic resections, and 8.2% and 0.7% in major and minor liver resections. Major complications occurred in 13.3% and 3.3% in pancreatic, and 19.2% and 6.3% in liver resections, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Major pancreatic and hepatic surgery are associated with significant morbidity and burden in our center, comparable with previous population-based studies. PMI is an informative way to monitor surgical outcomes and enable comparison between institutions. 2020 Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology. All rights reserved.
BACKGROUND: Hepatopancreatobiliary surgery is prone to complications. Methods are needed to monitor surgical outcomes and enable comparison between institutions. METHODS: Complications were collected prospectively and reviewed using the modified Accordion Severity Grading System (MASGS) and the Postoperative Morbidity Index (PMI). RESULTS: This study included 527 consecutive patients receiving either pancreatic or liver resection in 2000-2017 in Central Finland Central Hospital. The PMI was 0.177 for all patients, and 0.192, 0.094, 0.285, and 0.129 for patients receiving major pancreatic (n=218), minor pancreatic (n=93), major liver (n=73), and minor liver (n=143) resection, respectively. The rates of postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) after pancreaticoduodenectomies (n=200) were 6.5% for grade B and 5.5% for grade C; rates for biliary leak were 1.0% (grade A), 2.5% (grade B), and 0.5% (grade C). Similarly, the rates for delayed gastric emptying (DGE) were 2.8% (grade A), 15.6% (grade B), and 3.7% (grade C). Postoperative hepatic dysfunction occurred in 2.3%, major surgical site bleeding in 2.3%, and biloma in 7.9% of patients after liver resection. Ninety-day mortality rates were 3.7% and 1.1% in major and minor pancreatic resections, and 8.2% and 0.7% in major and minor liver resections. Major complications occurred in 13.3% and 3.3% in pancreatic, and 19.2% and 6.3% in liver resections, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Major pancreatic and hepatic surgery are associated with significant morbidity and burden in our center, comparable with previous population-based studies. PMI is an informative way to monitor surgical outcomes and enable comparison between institutions. 2020 Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology. All rights reserved.
Entities:
Keywords:
Accordion Severity Grading System; Pancreas; Postoperative Morbidity Index (PMI); benchmark; complications; liver; surgery
Authors: Fabian Rössler; Gonzalo Sapisochin; GiWon Song; Yu-Hung Lin; Mary Ann Simpson; Kiyoshi Hasegawa; Andrea Laurenzi; Santiago Sánchez Cabús; Milton Inostroza Nunez; Andrea Gatti; Magali Chahdi Beltrame; Ksenija Slankamenac; Paul D Greig; Sung-Gyu Lee; Chao-Long Chen; David R Grant; Elizabeth A Pomfret; Norihiro Kokudo; Daniel Cherqui; Kim M Olthoff; Abraham Shaked; Juan Carlos García-Valdecasas; Jan Lerut; Roberto I Troisi; Martin De Santibanes; Henrik Petrowsky; Milo A Puhan; Pierre-Alain Clavien Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2016-09 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Claudio Bassi; Christos Dervenis; Giovanni Butturini; Abe Fingerhut; Charles Yeo; Jakob Izbicki; John Neoptolemos; Michael Sarr; William Traverso; Marcus Buchler Journal: Surgery Date: 2005-07 Impact factor: 3.982
Authors: Markus K Diener; Hanns-Peter Knaebel; Christina Heukaufer; Gerd Antes; Markus W Büchler; Christoph M Seiler Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2007-02 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Jashodeep Datta; Russell S Lewis; Steven M Strasberg; Bruce L Hall; John D Allendorf; Joal D Beane; Stephen W Behrman; Mark P Callery; John D Christein; Jeffrey A Drebin; Irene Epelboym; Jin He; Henry A Pitt; Emily Winslow; Christopher Wolfgang; Major K Lee; Charles M Vollmer Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2014-12-02 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Stefan W Leichtle; Christodoulos Kaoutzanis; Nicolas J Mouawad; Kathleen B Welch; Richard Lampman; Verne L Hoshal; Edward Kreske Journal: J Surg Res Date: 2013-01-31 Impact factor: 2.192
Authors: Moritz Koch; O James Garden; Robert Padbury; Nuh N Rahbari; Rene Adam; Lorenzo Capussotti; Sheung Tat Fan; Yukihiro Yokoyama; Michael Crawford; Masatoshi Makuuchi; Christopher Christophi; Simon Banting; Mark Brooke-Smith; Val Usatoff; Masato Nagino; Guy Maddern; Thomas J Hugh; Jean-Nicolas Vauthey; Paul Greig; Myrddin Rees; Yuji Nimura; Joan Figueras; Ronald P DeMatteo; Markus W Büchler; Jürgen Weitz Journal: Surgery Date: 2011-02-12 Impact factor: 3.982
Authors: Charles J Yeo; John L Cameron; Keith D Lillemoe; Taylor A Sohn; Kurtis A Campbell; Patricia K Sauter; JoAnn Coleman; Ross A Abrams; Ralph H Hruban Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2002-09 Impact factor: 12.969