Kevin D Courtney1, Judith B Manola2, Aymen A Elfiky1, Robert Ross1, William K Oh1, Jeffrey T Yap3, Annick D Van den Abbeele3, Christopher W Ryan4, Tomasz M Beer4, Massimo Loda5, Carmen Priolo1, Philip Kantoff1, Mary-Ellen Taplin6. 1. Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Internal Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA. 2. Department of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA. 3. Department of Imaging, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA. 4. Knight Cancer Institute at Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR. 5. Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Internal Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA. 6. Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Internal Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA. Electronic address: Mary_Taplin@dfci.harvard.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The PTEN tumor suppressor is frequently lost in CRPC, with activation of Akt-mTOR signaling, driving growth. We conducted a phase I trial of the mTOR inhibitor, everolimus, and docetaxel in CRPC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients had progressive, metastatic, chemotherapy-naive CRPC. Patients received everolimus 10 mg daily for 2 weeks and underwent a restaging FDG-PET/computed tomography scan. Patient cohorts were subsequently treated at 3 dose levels of everolimus with docetaxel: 5 mg to 60 mg/m(2), 10 mg to 60 mg/m(2), and 10 mg to 70 mg/m(2). The primary end point was the safety and tolerability of combination therapy. RESULTS: Accrual was 4 patients at level 1, 3 patients at level 2, and 8 patients at level 3. Common toxicities were hematologic and fatigue. Serum concentrations of everolimus when administered with docetaxel were 1.5 to 14.8 ng/mL in patients receiving 5 mg everolimus and 4.5 to 55.4 ng/mL in patients receiving 10 mg everolimus. Four patients had partial metabolic response (PMR) using FDG-PET, 12 had stable metabolic disease, and 2 had progressive metabolic disease after a 2-week treatment with everolimus alone. Five of 12 evaluable patients experienced a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) reduction ≥ 50% during treatment with everolimus together with docetaxel. All 4 patients with a PMR according to PET imaging experienced a PSA reduction in response to everolimus with docetaxel, and 3 of 4 had PSA declines ≥ 50%. CONCLUSION: Everolimus 10 mg daily and docetaxel 60 mg/m(2) was safe in CRPC patients and these were the recommended doses in combination. FDG-PET response might serve as a biomarker for target inhibition by mTOR inhibitors.
BACKGROUND: The PTENtumor suppressor is frequently lost in CRPC, with activation of Akt-mTOR signaling, driving growth. We conducted a phase I trial of the mTOR inhibitor, everolimus, and docetaxel in CRPC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients had progressive, metastatic, chemotherapy-naive CRPC. Patients received everolimus 10 mg daily for 2 weeks and underwent a restaging FDG-PET/computed tomography scan. Patient cohorts were subsequently treated at 3 dose levels of everolimus with docetaxel: 5 mg to 60 mg/m(2), 10 mg to 60 mg/m(2), and 10 mg to 70 mg/m(2). The primary end point was the safety and tolerability of combination therapy. RESULTS: Accrual was 4 patients at level 1, 3 patients at level 2, and 8 patients at level 3. Common toxicities were hematologic and fatigue. Serum concentrations of everolimus when administered with docetaxel were 1.5 to 14.8 ng/mL in patients receiving 5 mg everolimus and 4.5 to 55.4 ng/mL in patients receiving 10 mg everolimus. Four patients had partial metabolic response (PMR) using FDG-PET, 12 had stable metabolic disease, and 2 had progressive metabolic disease after a 2-week treatment with everolimus alone. Five of 12 evaluable patients experienced a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) reduction ≥ 50% during treatment with everolimus together with docetaxel. All 4 patients with a PMR according to PET imaging experienced a PSA reduction in response to everolimus with docetaxel, and 3 of 4 had PSA declines ≥ 50%. CONCLUSION:Everolimus 10 mg daily and docetaxel 60 mg/m(2) was safe in CRPC patients and these were the recommended doses in combination. FDG-PET response might serve as a biomarker for target inhibition by mTOR inhibitors.
Authors: George V Thomas; Chris Tran; Ingo K Mellinghoff; Derek S Welsbie; Emily Chan; Barbara Fueger; Johannes Czernin; Charles L Sawyers Journal: Nat Med Date: 2005-12-11 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: Viktor Grünwald; Linda DeGraffenried; Douglas Russel; William E Friedrichs; Ratna B Ray; Manuel Hidalgo Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2002-11-01 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Dos D Sarbassov; Siraj M Ali; Shomit Sengupta; Joon-Ho Sheen; Peggy P Hsu; Alex F Bagley; Andrew L Markhard; David M Sabatini Journal: Mol Cell Date: 2006-04-06 Impact factor: 17.970
Authors: Shi-Yong Sun; Laura M Rosenberg; Xuerong Wang; Zhongmei Zhou; Ping Yue; Haian Fu; Fadlo R Khuri Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2005-08-15 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Aimee L Edinger; Corinne M Linardic; Gary G Chiang; Craig B Thompson; Robert T Abraham Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2003-12-01 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: George D Demetri; Margaret von Mehren; Charles D Blanke; Annick D Van den Abbeele; Burton Eisenberg; Peter J Roberts; Michael C Heinrich; David A Tuveson; Samuel Singer; Milos Janicek; Jonathan A Fletcher; Stuart G Silverman; Sandra L Silberman; Renaud Capdeville; Beate Kiese; Bin Peng; Sasa Dimitrijevic; Brian J Druker; Christopher Corless; Christopher D M Fletcher; Heikki Joensuu Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2002-08-15 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Kathryn E O'Reilly; Fredi Rojo; Qing-Bai She; David Solit; Gordon B Mills; Debra Smith; Heidi Lane; Francesco Hofmann; Daniel J Hicklin; Dale L Ludwig; Jose Baselga; Neal Rosen Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2006-02-01 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Andrew J Armstrong; Susan Halabi; Patrick Healy; Joshi J Alumkal; Carolyn Winters; Julie Kephart; Rhonda L Bitting; Carey Hobbs; Colleen F Soleau; Tomasz M Beer; Rachel Slottke; Kelly Mundy; Evan Y Yu; Daniel J George Journal: Eur J Cancer Date: 2017-05-11 Impact factor: 9.162
Authors: Mitchell E Gross; Tanya B Dorff; David I Quinn; Patricia M Diaz; Olga O Castellanos; David B Agus Journal: Clin Genitourin Cancer Date: 2017-07-14 Impact factor: 2.872
Authors: Avital Lev; Amriti R Lulla; Brian C Ross; Marie D Ralff; Petr B Makhov; David T Dicker; Wafik S El-Deiry Journal: Mol Cancer Res Date: 2018-03-27 Impact factor: 5.852
Authors: Nathaniel Melling; Ronald Simon; Jakob R Izbicki; Luigi M Terracciano; Carsten Bokemeyer; Guido Sauter; Andreas H Marx Journal: Int J Clin Exp Pathol Date: 2015-06-01
Authors: Sarah M Schwarzenböck; Matthias Eiber; Günther Kundt; Margitta Retz; Monique Sakretz; Jens Kurth; Uwe Treiber; Roman Nawroth; Ernst J Rummeny; Jürgen E Gschwend; Markus Schwaiger; Mark Thalgott; Bernd J Krause Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2016-06-17 Impact factor: 9.236