Mitchell E Gross1, Tanya B Dorff2, David I Quinn2, Patricia M Diaz3, Olga O Castellanos3, David B Agus4. 1. Lawrence J. Ellison Institute for Transformative Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA; Department of Medicine/Oncology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA. Electronic address: mitchell.gross@usc.edu. 2. Department of Medicine/Oncology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA; USC Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA. 3. Department of Medicine/Oncology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA. 4. Lawrence J. Ellison Institute for Transformative Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA; Department of Medicine/Oncology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Previous data suggests that co-targeting mammalian target of rapamycin and angiogenic pathways may potentiate effects of cytotoxic chemotherapy. We studied combining mammalian target of rapamycin and vascular endothelial growth factor inhibition with docetaxel in castrate-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). METHODS: Eligible patients had progressive, metastatic, chemotherapy-naive CRPC. Docetaxel and bevacizumab were given intravenously day 1 with everolimus orally daily on a 21-day cycle across 3 dose levels (75:15:2.5, 75:15:5, and 65:15:5; docetaxel mg/m2, mg/kg bevacizumab, and mg everolimus, respectively). Maintenance therapy with bevacizumab/everolimus without docetaxel was allowed after ≥ 6 cycles. RESULTS: Forty-three subjects were treated across all dose levels. Maximal tolerated doses for the combined therapies observed in the phase 1B portion of the trial were: docetaxel 75 mg/m2, bevacizumab 15 mg/kg, and everolimus 2.5 mg. Maximal prostate-specific antigen decline ≥ 30% and ≥ 50% was achieved in 33 (79%) and 31 (74%) of patients, respectively. Best response by modified Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors criteria in 25 subjects with measurable disease at baseline included complete or partial response in 20 (80%) patients. The median progression-free and overall survival were 8.9 months (95% confidence interval, 7.4-10.6 months) and 21.9 months (95% confidence interval, 18.4-30.3 months), respectively. Hematologic toxicities were the most common treatment-related grade ≥ 3 adverse events including: febrile neutropenia (12; 28%), lymphopenia (12; 28%), leukocytes (10; 23%), neutrophils (9; 21%), and hemoglobin (2; 5%). Nonhematologic grade ≥ 3 adverse events included: hypertension (8; 19%), fatigue (3; 7%), pneumonia (3; 7%), and mucositis (4; 5%). There was 1 treatment-related death owing to neutropenic fever and pneumonia in a patient treated at dose level 3 despite dose modifications and prophylactic growth factor support. CONCLUSIONS: Docetaxel, bevacizumab, and everolimus can be safely administered in CRPC and demonstrate a significant level of anticancer activity, meeting the predetermined response criteria. However, any potential benefit of combined therapy must be balanced against increased risk for toxicities. Our results do not support the hypothesis that this combination of agents improves upon the results obtained with docetaxel monotherapy in an unselected population of chemotherapy-naive patients with CRPC.
BACKGROUND: Previous data suggests that co-targeting mammalian target of rapamycin and angiogenic pathways may potentiate effects of cytotoxic chemotherapy. We studied combining mammalian target of rapamycin and vascular endothelial growth factor inhibition with docetaxel in castrate-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). METHODS: Eligible patients had progressive, metastatic, chemotherapy-naive CRPC. Docetaxel and bevacizumab were given intravenously day 1 with everolimus orally daily on a 21-day cycle across 3 dose levels (75:15:2.5, 75:15:5, and 65:15:5; docetaxel mg/m2, mg/kg bevacizumab, and mg everolimus, respectively). Maintenance therapy with bevacizumab/everolimus without docetaxel was allowed after ≥ 6 cycles. RESULTS: Forty-three subjects were treated across all dose levels. Maximal tolerated doses for the combined therapies observed in the phase 1B portion of the trial were: docetaxel 75 mg/m2, bevacizumab 15 mg/kg, and everolimus 2.5 mg. Maximal prostate-specific antigen decline ≥ 30% and ≥ 50% was achieved in 33 (79%) and 31 (74%) of patients, respectively. Best response by modified Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors criteria in 25 subjects with measurable disease at baseline included complete or partial response in 20 (80%) patients. The median progression-free and overall survival were 8.9 months (95% confidence interval, 7.4-10.6 months) and 21.9 months (95% confidence interval, 18.4-30.3 months), respectively. Hematologic toxicities were the most common treatment-related grade ≥ 3 adverse events including: febrile neutropenia (12; 28%), lymphopenia (12; 28%), leukocytes (10; 23%), neutrophils (9; 21%), and hemoglobin (2; 5%). Nonhematologic grade ≥ 3 adverse events included: hypertension (8; 19%), fatigue (3; 7%), pneumonia (3; 7%), and mucositis (4; 5%). There was 1 treatment-related death owing to neutropenic fever and pneumonia in a patient treated at dose level 3 despite dose modifications and prophylactic growth factor support. CONCLUSIONS:Docetaxel, bevacizumab, and everolimus can be safely administered in CRPC and demonstrate a significant level of anticancer activity, meeting the predetermined response criteria. However, any potential benefit of combined therapy must be balanced against increased risk for toxicities. Our results do not support the hypothesis that this combination of agents improves upon the results obtained with docetaxel monotherapy in an unselected population of chemotherapy-naive patients with CRPC.
Authors: D J George; S Halabi; T F Shepard; N J Vogelzang; D F Hayes; E J Small; P W Kantoff Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2001-07 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Iwan Beuvink; Anne Boulay; Stefano Fumagalli; Frederic Zilbermann; Stephan Ruetz; Terence O'Reilly; Francois Natt; Jonathan Hall; Heidi A Lane; George Thomas Journal: Cell Date: 2005-03-25 Impact factor: 41.582
Authors: Helen Chow; Paramita M Ghosh; Ralph deVere White; Christopher P Evans; Marc A Dall'Era; Stanley A Yap; Yueju Li; Laurel A Beckett; Primo N Lara; Chong-Xian Pan Journal: Cancer Date: 2016-03-28 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Joel Picus; Susan Halabi; W Kevin Kelly; Nicholas J Vogelzang; Young E Whang; Ellen B Kaplan; Walter M Stadler; Eric J Small Journal: Cancer Date: 2010-09-22 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Ian F Tannock; Ronald de Wit; William R Berry; Jozsef Horti; Anna Pluzanska; Kim N Chi; Stephane Oudard; Christine Théodore; Nicholas D James; Ingela Turesson; Mark A Rosenthal; Mario A Eisenberger Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2004-10-07 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Stacy S Shord; Linda R Bressler; Lauryn A Tierney; Sandra Cuellar; Amina George Journal: Am J Health Syst Pharm Date: 2009-06-01 Impact factor: 2.637
Authors: Josep Tabernero; Federico Rojo; Emiliano Calvo; Howard Burris; Ian Judson; Katharine Hazell; Erika Martinelli; Santiago Ramon y Cajal; Suzanne Jones; Laura Vidal; Nicholas Shand; Teresa Macarulla; Francisco Javier Ramos; Sasa Dimitrijevic; Ulrike Zoellner; Pui Tang; Michael Stumm; Heidi A Lane; David Lebwohl; José Baselga Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2008-03-10 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Karim Fizazi; Karim S Fizazi; Celestia S Higano; Joel B Nelson; Martin Gleave; Kurt Miller; Thomas Morris; Faith E Nathan; Stuart McIntosh; Kristine Pemberton; Judd W Moul Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2013-04-08 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: M Aapro; F Andre; K Blackwell; E Calvo; M Jahanzeb; K Papazisis; C Porta; K Pritchard; A Ravaud Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2014-04 Impact factor: 32.976