Literature DB >> 27317482

Prospective evaluation of [11C]Choline PET/CT in therapy response assessment of standardized docetaxel first-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced castration refractory prostate cancer.

Sarah M Schwarzenböck1,2, Matthias Eiber3, Günther Kundt4, Margitta Retz5, Monique Sakretz6, Jens Kurth6, Uwe Treiber5, Roman Nawroth5, Ernst J Rummeny7, Jürgen E Gschwend5, Markus Schwaiger3, Mark Thalgott5, Bernd J Krause3,6.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to prospectively evaluate the value of [11C] Choline PET/CT in monitoring early and late response to a standardized first-line docetaxel chemotherapy in castration refractory prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients.
METHODS: Thirty-two patients were referred for [11C] Choline PET/CT before the start of docetaxel chemotherapy, after one and ten chemotherapy cycles (or - in case of discontinuation - after the last administered cycle) for therapy response assessment. [11C] Choline uptake (SUVmax, SUVmean), CT derived Houndsfield units (HUmax, HUmean), and volume of bone, lung, and nodal metastases and local recurrence were measured semi-automatically at these timepoints. Change in SUVmax, SUVmean, HUmax, HUmean, and volume was assessed between PET 2 and 1 (early response assessment, ERA) and PET 3 and 1 (late response assessment, LRA) on a patient and lesion basis. Results of PET/CT were compared to clinically used RECIST 1.1 and clinical criteria based therapy response assessment including PSA for defining progressive disease (PD) and non-progressive disease (nPD), respectively. Relationships between changes of SUVmax and SUVmean (early and late) and changes of PSAearly and PSAlate were evaluated. Prognostic value of initial SUVmax and SUVmean was assessed. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS.
RESULTS: In the patient-based ERA and LRA there were no statistically significant differences in change of choline uptake, HU, and volume between PD and nPD applying RECIST or clinical response criteria. In the lesion-based ERA, decrease in choline uptake of bone metastases was even higher in PD (applying RECIST criteria), whereas in LRA the decrease was higher in nPD (applying clinical criteria). There were only significant correlations between change in choline uptake and PSA in ERA in PD, in LRA no significant correlations were discovered. Initial SUVmax and SUVmean were statistically significantly higher in nPD (applying clinical criteria).
CONCLUSION: There is no significant correlation between change in choline uptake in [11C] Choline PET/CT and clinically routinely used objective response assessment during the early and late course of docetaxel chemotherapy. Therefore, [11C] Choline PET/CT seems to be of limited use in therapy response assessment in standardized first-line chemotherapy in mCRPC patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Advanced prostate cancer; Choline; Docetaxel therapy; PET/CT; Therapy response assessment

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27317482     DOI: 10.1007/s00259-016-3439-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging        ISSN: 1619-7070            Impact factor:   9.236


  23 in total

1.  Circulating tumor cells versus objective response assessment predicting survival in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients treated with docetaxel chemotherapy.

Authors:  M Thalgott; M M Heck; M Eiber; M Souvatzoglou; G Hatzichristodoulou; V Kehl; B J Krause; B Rack; M Retz; J E Gschwend; U Andergassen; R Nawroth
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-02-24       Impact factor: 4.553

2.  Measurement of clinical and subclinical tumour response using [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose and positron emission tomography: review and 1999 EORTC recommendations. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) PET Study Group.

Authors:  H Young; R Baum; U Cremerius; K Herholz; O Hoekstra; A A Lammertsma; J Pruim; P Price
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 9.162

3.  Increases in quantitative D-dimer levels correlate with progressive disease better than circulating tumor cell counts in patients with refractory prostate cancer.

Authors:  Joseph D Khoury; Dorothy M Adcock; Fanny Chan; James T Symanowski; Stefan Tiefenbacher; Oscar Goodman; Lazara Paz; Yupo Ma; David C Ward; Nicholas J Vogelzang; Louis M Fink
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.493

4.  (18)F-Fluorocholine PET/CT for early response assessment in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer treated with enzalutamide.

Authors:  Ugo De Giorgi; Paola Caroli; Emanuela Scarpi; Vincenza Conteduca; Salvatore Luca Burgio; Cecilia Menna; Andrea Moretti; Riccardo Galassi; Lorena Rossi; Dino Amadori; Giovanni Paganelli; Federica Matteucci
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2015-03-26       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 5.  Measuring therapeutic efficacy in the changing paradigm of castrate-resistant prostate cancer.

Authors:  P F Mulders; J A Schalken
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2009-07-14       Impact factor: 5.554

6.  Design and end points of clinical trials for patients with progressive prostate cancer and castrate levels of testosterone: recommendations of the Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Working Group.

Authors:  Howard I Scher; Susan Halabi; Ian Tannock; Michael Morris; Cora N Sternberg; Michael A Carducci; Mario A Eisenberger; Celestia Higano; Glenn J Bubley; Robert Dreicer; Daniel Petrylak; Philip Kantoff; Ethan Basch; William Kevin Kelly; William D Figg; Eric J Small; Tomasz M Beer; George Wilding; Alison Martin; Maha Hussain
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-03-01       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Categorical versus continuous circulating tumor cell enumeration as early surrogate marker for therapy response and prognosis during docetaxel therapy in metastatic prostate cancer patients.

Authors:  Mark Thalgott; Brigitte Rack; Matthias Eiber; Michael Souvatzoglou; Matthias M Heck; Caroline Kronester; Ulrich Andergassen; Victoria Kehl; Bernd J Krause; Jurgen E Gschwend; Margitta Retz; Roman Nawroth
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2015-06-09       Impact factor: 4.430

Review 8.  Imaging metastatic bone disease from carcinoma of the prostate.

Authors:  C Messiou; G Cook; N M deSouza
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-09-29       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  Visceral disease in castration-resistant prostate cancer.

Authors:  C Pezaro; A Omlin; D Lorente; D Nava Rodrigues; R Ferraldeschi; D Bianchini; D Mukherji; R Riisnaes; A Altavilla; M Crespo; N Tunariu; J de Bono; G Attard
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2013-11-22       Impact factor: 20.096

10.  External validation of risk classification in patients with docetaxel-treated castration-resistant prostate cancer.

Authors:  Kazuhiko Nakano; Kenji Komatsu; Taro Kubo; Shinsuke Natsui; Akinori Nukui; Shinsuke Kurokawa; Minoru Kobayashi; Tatsuo Morita
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2014-04-18       Impact factor: 2.264

View more
  16 in total

1.  Preliminary results on response assessment using 68Ga-HBED-CC-PSMA PET/CT in patients with metastatic prostate cancer undergoing docetaxel chemotherapy.

Authors:  Anna Katharina Seitz; Isabel Rauscher; Bernhard Haller; Markus Krönke; Sophia Luther; Matthias M Heck; Thomas Horn; Jürgen E Gschwend; Markus Schwaiger; Matthias Eiber; Tobias Maurer
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2017-11-28       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 2.  PET and PET/CT with radiolabeled choline in prostate cancer: a critical reappraisal of 20 years of clinical studies.

Authors:  Giampiero Giovacchini; Elisabetta Giovannini; Rossella Leoncini; Mattia Riondato; Andrea Ciarmiello
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2017-04-14       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  PET/CT imaging for evaluating response to therapy in castration-resistant prostate cancer.

Authors:  Francesco Ceci; Paolo Castellucci; Cristina Nanni; Stefano Fanti
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 9.236

4.  68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT-derived metabolic parameters for determination of whole-body tumor burden and treatment response in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Christian Schmidkonz; Michael Cordes; Daniela Schmidt; Tobias Bäuerle; Theresa Ida Goetz; Michael Beck; Olaf Prante; Alexander Cavallaro; Michael Uder; Bernd Wullich; Peter Goebell; Torsten Kuwert; Philipp Ritt
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2018-05-03       Impact factor: 9.236

5.  11C-choline PET/CT predicts survival in prostate cancer patients with PSA < 1 NG/ml.

Authors:  Giampiero Giovacchini; Priscilla Guglielmo; Paola Mapelli; Elena Incerti; Ana Maria Samanes Gajate; Elisabetta Giovannini; Mattia Riondato; Alberto Briganti; Luigi Gianolli; Andrea Ciarmiello; Maria Picchio
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2019-01-10       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 6.  Therapy assessment in prostate cancer using choline and PSMA PET/CT.

Authors:  Francesco Ceci; Ken Herrmann; Boris Hadaschik; Paolo Castellucci; Stefano Fanti
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2017-05-25       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 7.  Theranostics of prostate cancer: from molecular imaging to precision molecular radiotherapy targeting the prostate specific membrane antigen.

Authors:  Harshad R Kulkarni; Aviral Singh; Thomas Langbein; Christiane Schuchardt; Dirk Mueller; Jingjing Zhang; Coline Lehmann; Richard P Baum
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 8.  [The role of PSMA PET-CT in patients with metastatic prostate cancer].

Authors:  J von Hardenberg; K-A Büsing; P Nuhn; M Ritter
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 9.  Recent updates and developments in PET imaging of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Steven P Rowe; Geoffrey B Johnson; Martin G Pomper; Michael A Gorin; Spencer C Behr
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2020-12

Review 10.  [The role of PSMA PET-CT in patients with metastatic prostate cancer].

Authors:  J von Hardenberg; K-A Büsing; P Nuhn; M Ritter
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 0.635

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.