Literature DB >> 25448552

Development of an ultrasound sensitive oxygen carrier for oxygen delivery to hypoxic tissue.

John R Eisenbrey1, Lorenzo Albala2, Michael R Kramer3, Nick Daroshefski2, David Brown2, Ji-Bin Liu4, Maria Stanczak4, Patrick O'Kane4, Flemming Forsberg4, Margaret A Wheatley2.   

Abstract

Radiation therapy is frequently used in the treatment of malignancies, but tumors are often more resistant than the surrounding normal tissue to radiation effects, because the tumor microenvironment is hypoxic. This manuscript details the fabrication and characterization of an ultrasound-sensitive, injectable oxygen microbubble platform (SE61O2) for overcoming tumor hypoxia. SE61O2 was fabricated by first sonicating a mixture of Span 60 and water-soluble vitamin E purged with perfluorocarbon gas. SE61O2 microbubbles were separated from the foam by flotation, then freeze dried under vacuum to remove all perfluorocarbon, and reconstituted with oxygen. Visually, SE61O2 microbubbles were smooth, spherical, with an average diameter of 3.1 μm and were reconstituted to a concentration of 6.5 E7 microbubbles/ml. Oxygen-filled SE61O2 provides 16.9 ± 1.0 dB of enhancement at a dose of 880 μl/l (5.7 E7 microbubbles/l) with a half-life under insonation of approximately 15 min. In in vitro release experiments, 2 ml of SE61O2 (1.3 E8 microbubbles) triggered with ultrasound was found to elevate oxygen partial pressures of 100ml of degassed saline 13.8 mmHg more than untriggered bubbles and 20.6 mmHg more than ultrasound triggered nitrogen-filled bubbles. In preliminary in vivo delivery experiments, triggered SE61O2 resulted in a 30.4 mmHg and 27.4 mmHg increase in oxygen partial pressures in two breast tumor mouse xenografts.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Microbubble; Oxygen delivery; Surfactant; Tumor hypoxia; Ultrasound contrast agent

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25448552      PMCID: PMC6457456          DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2014.11.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Pharm        ISSN: 0378-5173            Impact factor:   5.875


  32 in total

1.  Effect of filling gases on the backscatter from contrast microbubbles: theory and in vivo measurements.

Authors:  F Forsberg; R Basude; J B Liu; J Alessandro; W T Shi; N M Rawool; B B Goldberg; M A Wheatley
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 2.998

2.  Influence of environmental conditions on a new surfactant-based contrast agent: ST68.

Authors:  R Basude; J W Duckworth; M A Wheatley
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 2.998

3.  Generation of ultraharmonics in surfactant based ultrasound contrast agents: use and advantages.

Authors:  R Basude; M A Wheatley
Journal:  Ultrasonics       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 2.890

Review 4.  Contrast echocardiography: new agents.

Authors:  Andrew P Miller; Navin C Nanda
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 2.998

Review 5.  Exploiting tumour hypoxia in cancer treatment.

Authors:  J Martin Brown; William R Wilson
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 60.716

6.  Surfactant-stabilized contrast agent on the nanoscale for diagnostic ultrasound imaging.

Authors:  Margaret A Wheatley; Flemming Forsberg; Neal Dube; Mihir Patel; Brian E Oeffinger
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 2.998

Review 7.  Therapeutic use of ultrasound targeted microbubble destruction: a review of non-cardiac applications.

Authors:  R Bekeredjian; H A Katus; H F Kuecherer
Journal:  Ultraschall Med       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 6.548

Review 8.  Ultrasound microbubble contrast agents: fundamentals and application to gene and drug delivery.

Authors:  Katherine Ferrara; Rachel Pollard; Mark Borden
Journal:  Annu Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 9.590

9.  Nitric oxide delivery by ultrasonic cracking: some limitations.

Authors:  Michiel Postema; Ayache Bouakaz; Folkert J ten Cate; Georg Schmitz; Nico de Jong; Annemieke van Wamel
Journal:  Ultrasonics       Date:  2006-06-28       Impact factor: 2.890

Review 10.  Angiogenesis: how a tumor adapts to hypoxia.

Authors:  D E Richard; E Berra; J Pouysségur
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  1999-12-29       Impact factor: 3.575

View more
  21 in total

1.  Breast Cancer Brain Metastasis Response to Radiation After Microbubble Oxygen Delivery in a Murine Model.

Authors:  Lauren J Delaney; Lorela Ciraku; Brian E Oeffinger; Corinne E Wessner; Ji-Bin Liu; Jingzhi Li; Kibo Nam; Flemming Forsberg; Dennis B Leeper; Patrick O'Kane; Margaret A Wheatley; Mauricio J Reginato; John R Eisenbrey
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2019-05-23       Impact factor: 2.153

2.  Characterization and Imaging of Lipid-Shelled Microbubbles for Ultrasound-Triggered Release of Xenon.

Authors:  Himanshu Shekhar; Arunkumar Palaniappan; Tao Peng; Maxime Lafond; Melanie R Moody; Kevin J Haworth; Shaoling Huang; David D McPherson; Christy K Holland
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 7.620

3.  Preserving the Integrity of Surfactant-Stabilized Microbubble Membranes for Localized Oxygen Delivery.

Authors:  Brian E Oeffinger; Purva Vaidya; Iman Ayaz; Rawan Shraim; John R Eisenbrey; Margaret A Wheatley
Journal:  Langmuir       Date:  2019-03-14       Impact factor: 3.882

Review 4.  Oxygen Regulation in Development: Lessons from Embryogenesis towards Tissue Engineering.

Authors:  Shahrzad Fathollahipour; Pritam S Patil; Nic D Leipzig
Journal:  Cells Tissues Organs       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 2.481

5.  Oxygen Delivering Biomaterials for Tissue Engineering.

Authors:  Ashley L Farris; Alexandra N Rindone; Warren L Grayson
Journal:  J Mater Chem B       Date:  2016-02-22       Impact factor: 6.331

6.  Sensitization of Hypoxic Tumors to Radiation Therapy Using Ultrasound-Sensitive Oxygen Microbubbles.

Authors:  John R Eisenbrey; Rawan Shraim; Ji-Bin Liu; Jingzhi Li; Maria Stanczak; Brian Oeffinger; Dennis B Leeper; Scott W Keith; Lauren J Jablonowski; Flemming Forsberg; Patrick O'Kane; Margaret A Wheatley
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 7.  Emerging Applications of Ultrasound-Contrast Agents in Radiation Therapy.

Authors:  Quezia Lacerda; Mohamed Tantawi; Dennis B Leeper; Margaret A Wheatley; John R Eisenbrey
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2021-02-27       Impact factor: 3.694

Review 8.  Advanced nanomaterials targeting hypoxia to enhance radiotherapy.

Authors:  Jia Li; Wenting Shang; Yong Li; Sirui Fu; Jie Tian; Ligong Lu
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2018-10-01

9.  Delivery of Hydrogen Sulfide by Ultrasound Targeted Microbubble Destruction Attenuates Myocardial Ischemia-reperfusion Injury.

Authors:  Gangbin Chen; Li Yang; Lintao Zhong; Shelby Kutty; Yuegang Wang; Kai Cui; Jiancheng Xiu; Shiping Cao; Qiaobing Huang; Wangjun Liao; Yulin Liao; Juefei Wu; Wenzhu Zhang; Jianping Bin
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-07-29       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 10.  Oxygen-Carrying Micro/Nanobubbles: Composition, Synthesis Techniques and Potential Prospects in Photo-Triggered Theranostics.

Authors:  Muhammad Saad Khan; Jangsun Hwang; Kyungwoo Lee; Yonghyun Choi; Kyobum Kim; Hyung-Jun Koo; Jong Wook Hong; Jonghoon Choi
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2018-08-31       Impact factor: 4.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.