Literature DB >> 10576263

Effect of filling gases on the backscatter from contrast microbubbles: theory and in vivo measurements.

F Forsberg1, R Basude, J B Liu, J Alessandro, W T Shi, N M Rawool, B B Goldberg, M A Wheatley.   

Abstract

Two surfactant-based contrast agents, ST44 and ST68, were produced according to US Patent # 5,352,436 and filled with either air, C4F10 (perfluorobutane) or SF6 (sulfur hexaflouride). Ten rabbits received i.v. injections of each agent/gas combination with 5 repetitions of each dose (range: 0.005-0.13 mL/kg). A custom-made 10-MHz cuff transducer was placed around the surgically exposed distal aorta and audio Doppler signals were acquired in vivo. Quantitative in vivo dose responses were calculated off-line using spectral power analysis and compared to a theoretical model of microbubble dissolution and enhancement. For qualitative comparisons, 10 rabbits were imaged pre- and postcontrast administration (dose: 0.1 mL/kg) in gray-scale and colour. All agent/gas combinations produced marked Doppler enhancement with air bubbles enhancing least of all (p < 0.0001) and ST68-SF6 best of all (maximum: 27.6 +/- 2.04 dB; p < 0.012). There were no significant differences between other agent/gas combinations (0.30 < p < 0.70). Theoretical enhancement was within 1 order of magnitude of the experimental observations (i.e., deviations of up to 10 dB). The duration of contrast enhancement was 1-2 min for air-filled bubbles, 3-5 min for SF6-filled bubbles and more than 7 min for C4F10-filled bubbles. In conclusion, ST68-SF6 microbubbles produced most in vivo enhancement of the agent/gas combinations studied. Theory matched the measurements within an order of magnitude.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10576263     DOI: 10.1016/s0301-5629(99)00079-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol        ISSN: 0301-5629            Impact factor:   2.998


  6 in total

Review 1.  Point-of-care echocardiography for the evaluation of right-to-left cardiopulmonary shunts: a narrative review.

Authors:  Tim Montrief; Stephen Alerhand; André Denault; Jeffrey Scott
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  2020-09-17       Impact factor: 5.063

2.  Development of an ultrasound sensitive oxygen carrier for oxygen delivery to hypoxic tissue.

Authors:  John R Eisenbrey; Lorenzo Albala; Michael R Kramer; Nick Daroshefski; David Brown; Ji-Bin Liu; Maria Stanczak; Patrick O'Kane; Flemming Forsberg; Margaret A Wheatley
Journal:  Int J Pharm       Date:  2014-11-18       Impact factor: 5.875

3.  Growth and dissolution of an encapsulated contrast microbubble: effects of encapsulation permeability.

Authors:  Kausik Sarkar; Amit Katiyar; Pankaj Jain
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 2.998

4.  Quantitative evaluation of renal parenchymal perfusion using contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in renal ischemia-reperfusion injury in dogs.

Authors:  Gahyun Lee; Sunghoon Jeon; Sang-Kwon Lee; Byunggyu Cheon; Sohyeon Moon; Jun-Gyu Park; Kyoung-Oh Cho; Jihye Choi
Journal:  J Vet Sci       Date:  2017-12-31       Impact factor: 1.672

Review 5.  Ultrasound contrast agents.

Authors:  Andre Ignee; Nathan S S Atkinson; Gudrun Schuessler; Christoph F Dietrich
Journal:  Endosc Ultrasound       Date:  2016 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.628

Review 6.  Applications of Ultrasound-Mediated Drug Delivery and Gene Therapy.

Authors:  Juliana Sitta; Candace M Howard
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-10-25       Impact factor: 5.923

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.