Literature DB >> 11775659

Generation of ultraharmonics in surfactant based ultrasound contrast agents: use and advantages.

R Basude1, M A Wheatley.   

Abstract

A unique distinction between surfactant stabilized ultrasound contrast agent ST68 and water (or tissue), is the enhanced ability of the agent to generate non-linear frequencies such as sub-harmonics (f0/2), higher harmonics (2fo, 3fo, 4fo,...), and ultraharmonics (3f0/2, Sf0/2, 7f0/2,...), when insonated with fundamental frequency f0. Currently, second harmonics (2f0) have been predominantly researched, to exploit the diagnostic benefits of the contrast-specific non-linear imaging. However, we found that at normal imaging pressures (100 kPa-1 MPa), ST68 agent-generated second harmonic enhancements dropped to approximately 8 dB at 100 kPa and approximately 2 dB at 1 MPa. Moreover, at these pressures water (or tissue) produced strong second harmonics due to non-linear propagation. Ultraharmonics and sub-harmonics on the other hand, were generated only by the agent, and were not produced due to the non-linear propagation of ultrasound in either water or tissue. Additionally, ultraharmonic (3f0/2) enhancements of approximately 23 dB at 100 kPa, approximately 35 dB at 0.5 MPa and approximately 41dB at 1.1 MPa for ST68-PFC, offer much greater signal to noise ratio than higher harmonics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11775659     DOI: 10.1016/s0041-624x(01)00080-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasonics        ISSN: 0041-624X            Impact factor:   2.890


  9 in total

1.  Estimating the shell parameters of SonoVue microbubbles using light scattering.

Authors:  Juan Tu; Jingfeng Guan; Yuanyuan Qiu; Thomas J Matula
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 2.  [Ultrasound contrast agents and prostate cancer].

Authors:  F Frauscher; L Pallwein; A Klauser; A P Berger; F Koppelstaetter; J Gradl; M Schurich; J Bektic; G M Pinggera; E J Halpern; W Horninger; G Bartsch; D zur Nedden
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 0.635

3.  Preserving enhancement in freeze-dried contrast agent ST68: Examination of excipients.

Authors:  Carl Solis; Flemming Forsberg; Margaret A Wheatley
Journal:  Int J Pharm       Date:  2010-06-09       Impact factor: 5.875

4.  Development of an ultrasound sensitive oxygen carrier for oxygen delivery to hypoxic tissue.

Authors:  John R Eisenbrey; Lorenzo Albala; Michael R Kramer; Nick Daroshefski; David Brown; Ji-Bin Liu; Maria Stanczak; Patrick O'Kane; Flemming Forsberg; Margaret A Wheatley
Journal:  Int J Pharm       Date:  2014-11-18       Impact factor: 5.875

Review 5.  Contrast specific imaging in the detection and localization of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Hessel Wijkstra; Margot H Wink; Jean J M C H de la Rosette
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2004-10-05       Impact factor: 4.226

6.  Drug-loaded nano/microbubbles for combining ultrasonography and targeted chemotherapy.

Authors:  Zhonggao Gao; Anne M Kennedy; Douglas A Christensen; Natalya Y Rapoport
Journal:  Ultrasonics       Date:  2007-11-19       Impact factor: 2.890

7.  Dual-frequency piezoelectric transducers for contrast enhanced ultrasound imaging.

Authors:  K Heath Martin; Brooks D Lindsey; Jianguo Ma; Mike Lee; Sibo Li; F Stuart Foster; Xiaoning Jiang; Paul A Dayton
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2014-11-04       Impact factor: 3.576

8.  A general framework for modeling sub- and ultraharmonics of ultrasound contrast agent signals with MISO volterra series.

Authors:  Fatima Sbeity; Sébastien Ménigot; Jamal Charara; Jean-Marc Girault
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2013-03-10       Impact factor: 2.238

9.  Contrast improvement in sub- and ultraharmonic ultrasound contrast imaging by combining several hammerstein models.

Authors:  Fatima Sbeity; Sébastien Ménigot; Jamal Charara; Jean-Marc Girault
Journal:  Int J Biomed Imaging       Date:  2013-11-07
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.