Literature DB >> 25447979

Human papillomavirus testing 2007-2012: co-testing and triage utilization and impact on subsequent clinical management.

Jack Cuzick1, Orrin Myers, William C Hunt, Debbie Saslow, Philip E Castle, Walter Kinney, Alan Waxman, Michael Robertson, Cosette M Wheeler.   

Abstract

In the United States, high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) testing is recommended for women with atypical squamous cells of unknown significance (ASC-US) cytology, and co-testing with cytology and HPV is a recommended option for screening women aged ≥ 30 years. No population-based data are available to examine utilization of HPV testing in the United States. Using the New Mexico HPV Pap Registry data resource, we describe population trends (2007-2012) in utilization and positivity rates for HPV testing as a routine co-testing screening procedure and for triage of ASC-US and other cytologic outcomes. For women aged 30-65 years co-testing increased from 5.2% in 2007 to 19.1% in 2012 (p < 0.001). Overall 82% of women with ASC-US cytology who did not receive co-testing also had an HPV test. HPV positivity was age and cytology result dependent but did not show time trends. For women with negative cytology, 64% received an additional screening test within 3 years if no co-test was done or if it was positive, but this was reduced to 47% with a negative co-test. Reflex HPV testing for ASC-US cytology is well established and occurs in most women. Evidence for reflex testing is also observed following other abnormal cytology outcomes. Co-testing in women aged 30-65 years has more than tripled from 2007 to 2012, but was still only used in 19.1% of women aged 30-65 years attending for screening in 2012. Women receiving co-testing had longer repeat screening intervals, but rescreening within 3 years is still very common even with co-testing.
© 2014 The Authors. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of UICC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  HPV co-testing; New Mexico; New Mexico HPV Pap Registry; United States; cervical screening; coverage; high-risk HPV testing; outcome; utilization

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25447979      PMCID: PMC4737644          DOI: 10.1002/ijc.29337

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cancer        ISSN: 0020-7136            Impact factor:   7.396


  20 in total

Review 1.  American Cancer Society guideline for the early detection of cervical neoplasia and cancer.

Authors:  Debbie Saslow; Carolyn D Runowicz; Diane Solomon; Anna-Barbara Moscicki; Robert A Smith; Harmon J Eyre; Carmel Cohen
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2002 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 508.702

Review 2.  Screening for cervical cancer: recommendations and rationale.

Authors: 
Journal:  Am Fam Physician       Date:  2003-04-15       Impact factor: 3.292

3.  American Cancer Society, American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology, and American Society for Clinical Pathology screening guidelines for the prevention and early detection of cervical cancer.

Authors:  Debbie Saslow; Diane Solomon; Herschel W Lawson; Maureen Killackey; Shalini L Kulasingam; Joanna Cain; Francisco A R Garcia; Ann T Moriarty; Alan G Waxman; David C Wilbur; Nicolas Wentzensen; Levi S Downs; Mark Spitzer; Anna-Barbara Moscicki; Eduardo L Franco; Mark H Stoler; Mark Schiffman; Philip E Castle; Evan R Myers
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 2.493

4.  The ATHENA human papillomavirus study: design, methods, and baseline results.

Authors:  Thomas C Wright; Mark H Stoler; Catherine M Behrens; Raymond Apple; Toniann Derion; Teresa L Wright
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-07-22       Impact factor: 8.661

5.  Primary care provider practices and beliefs related to cervical cancer screening with the HPV test in Federally Qualified Health Centers.

Authors:  K B Roland; V B Benard; A Greek; N A Hawkins; D Manninen; M Saraiya
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2013-04-28       Impact factor: 4.018

6.  The age-specific relationships of abnormal cytology and human papillomavirus DNA results to the risk of cervical precancer and cancer.

Authors:  Philip E Castle; Barbara Fetterman; J Thomas Cox; Ruth Shaber; Nancy Poitras; Thomas Lorey; Walter Kinney
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 7.661

7.  Screening for cervical cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement.

Authors:  Virginia A Moyer
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2012-06-19       Impact factor: 25.391

8.  Trends of human papillomavirus testing in cervical cancer screening at a large academic cytology laboratory.

Authors:  Darcy F Phelan; John K Boitnott; Douglas P Clark; Lisa C Dubay; Patti E Gravitt
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 9.  2001 Consensus Guidelines for the management of women with cervical cytological abnormalities.

Authors:  Thomas C Wright; J Thomas Cox; L Stewart Massad; Leo B Twiggs; Edward J Wilkinson
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2002-04-24       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Practice improvement in cervical screening and management (PICSM): symposium on management of cervical abnormalities in adolescents and young women.

Authors:  Anna-Barbara Moscicki; J Thomas Cox
Journal:  J Low Genit Tract Dis       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 1.925

View more
  16 in total

1.  Revisiting time to translation: implementation of evidence-based practices (EBPs) in cancer control.

Authors:  Shahnaz Khan; David Chambers; Gila Neta
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 2.506

2.  Uptake of HPV testing and extended cervical cancer screening intervals following cytology alone and Pap/HPV cotesting in women aged 30-65 years.

Authors:  Michelle I Silver; Anne F Rositch; Darcy F Phelan-Emrick; Patti E Gravitt
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 2.506

3.  Three-year risk of high-grade CIN for women aged 30 years or older who undergo baseline Pap cytology and HPV co-screening.

Authors:  Ming Guo; Abha Khanna; Jianping Wang; Marilyn A Dawlett; Teresa L Kologinczak; Genevieve R Lyons; Roland L Bassett; Nour Sneige; Yun Gong; Therese B Bevers
Journal:  Cancer Cytopathol       Date:  2017-05-12       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  Harms of cervical cancer screening in the United States and the Netherlands.

Authors:  Dik Habbema; Sheila Weinmann; Marc Arbyn; Aruna Kamineni; Andrew E Williams; Inge M C M de Kok; Folkert van Kemenade; Terry S Field; Joost van Rosmalen; Martin L Brown
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 7.396

5.  Cost-effectiveness analysis of the 2019 American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology Risk-Based Management Consensus Guidelines for the management of abnormal cervical cancer screening tests and cancer precursors.

Authors:  Vidit N Munshi; Rebecca B Perkins; Stephen Sy; Jane J Kim
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2021-09-20       Impact factor: 10.693

6.  Inefficiencies and High-Value Improvements in U.S. Cervical Cancer Screening Practice: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.

Authors:  Jane J Kim; Nicole G Campos; Stephen Sy; Emily A Burger; Jack Cuzick; Philip E Castle; William C Hunt; Alan Waxman; Cosette M Wheeler
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2015-09-29       Impact factor: 25.391

7.  Outcomes in Women With Cytology Showing Atypical Squamous Cells of Undetermined Significance With vs Without Human Papillomavirus Testing.

Authors:  Jack Cuzick; Orrin Myers; Ji-Hyun Lee; Yang Shi; Julia C Gage; William C Hunt; Michael Robertson; Cosette M Wheeler
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2017-10-01       Impact factor: 31.777

8.  A Low-Cost HPV Immunochromatographic Assay to Detect High-Grade Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia.

Authors:  Vânia Sammartino Mariano; Adriana Tarlá Lorenzi; Cristovam Scapulatempo-Neto; Maíra Degiovani Stein; Julio Cesar Possati Resende; Márcio Antoniazzi; Luisa Lina Villa; José Eduardo Levi; Adhemar Longatto-Filho; José Humberto Tavares Guerreiro Fregnani
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-10-20       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  The Next Generation of Cervical Cancer Screening: Should Guidelines Focus on Best Practices for the Future or Current Screening Capacity?

Authors:  Phil Castle; Sarah Feldman; Rebecca B Perkins
Journal:  J Low Genit Tract Dis       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 1.925

10.  Cost-Effectiveness of Primary HPV Screening Strategies and Triage With Cytology or Dual Stain for Cervical Cancer.

Authors:  Tanitra Tantitamit; Nipon Khemapech; Piyalamporn Havanond; Wichai Termrungruanglert
Journal:  Cancer Control       Date:  2020 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.302

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.