Literature DB >> 33392908

Revisiting time to translation: implementation of evidence-based practices (EBPs) in cancer control.

Shahnaz Khan1,2, David Chambers3, Gila Neta3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Previous studies estimate translation of research evidence into practice takes 17 years. However, this estimate is not specific to cancer control evidence-based practices (EBPs), nor do these studies evaluate variation in the translational process. We examined the translational pathway of cancer control EBPs.
METHODS: We selected five cancer control EBPs where data on uptake were readily available. Years from landmark publication to clinical guideline issuance to implementation, defined as 50% uptake, were measured. The translational pathway for each EBP was mapped and an average total time across EBPs was calculated.
RESULTS: Five cancer control EBPs were included: mammography, clinicians' advice to quit smoking, colorectal cancer screening, HPV co-testing, and HPV vaccination. Time from publication to implementation ranged from 13 to 21 years, averaging 15 years. Time from publication to guideline issuance ranged from 3 to 17 years, and from guideline issuance to implementation, - 4 to 12 years. Clinician's advice to quit smoking, HPV co-testing, and HPV vaccination were most rapidly implemented; colorectal cancer screening and mammography were slowest to implement.
CONCLUSION: The average time to implementation was 15 years for the five EBPs we evaluated, a marginal improvement from prior findings. Although newer EBPs such as HPV vaccination and HPV co-testing were faster to implement than other EBPs, continued efforts in implementation science to speed research to practice are needed.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cancer control; Evidence-based practice; Implementation; Translation; Uptake

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33392908     DOI: 10.1007/s10552-020-01376-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Causes Control        ISSN: 0957-5243            Impact factor:   2.506


  23 in total

Review 1.  Cochrane systematic review of colorectal cancer screening using the fecal occult blood test (hemoccult): an update.

Authors:  Paul Hewitson; Paul Glasziou; Eila Watson; Bernie Towler; Les Irwig
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-05-13       Impact factor: 10.864

2.  Attributes of successful smoking cessation interventions in medical practice. A meta-analysis of 39 controlled trials.

Authors:  T E Kottke; R N Battista; G H DeFriese; M L Brekke
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1988-05-20       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Periodic breast cancer screening in reducing mortality from breast cancer.

Authors:  S Shapiro; P Strax; L Venet
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1971-03-15       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Uptake of HPV testing and extended cervical cancer screening intervals following cytology alone and Pap/HPV cotesting in women aged 30-65 years.

Authors:  Michelle I Silver; Anne F Rositch; Darcy F Phelan-Emrick; Patti E Gravitt
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 2.506

5.  Reducing mortality from colorectal cancer by screening for fecal occult blood. Minnesota Colon Cancer Control Study.

Authors:  J S Mandel; J H Bond; T R Church; D C Snover; G M Bradley; L M Schuman; F Ederer
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1993-05-13       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  A case-control study of screening sigmoidoscopy and mortality from colorectal cancer.

Authors:  J V Selby; G D Friedman; C P Quesenberry; N S Weiss
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1992-03-05       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 7.  Screening for colorectal cancer in adults at average risk: a summary of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.

Authors:  Michael Pignone; Melissa Rich; Steven M Teutsch; Alfred O Berg; Kathleen N Lohr
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2002-07-16       Impact factor: 25.391

8.  Effect of general practitioners' advice against smoking.

Authors:  M A Russell; C Wilson; C Taylor; C D Baker
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1979-07-28

Review 9.  Nicotine receptor partial agonists for smoking cessation.

Authors:  Kate Cahill; Lindsay F Stead; Tim Lancaster
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2008-07-16

Review 10.  The answer is 17 years, what is the question: understanding time lags in translational research.

Authors:  Zoë Slote Morris; Steven Wooding; Jonathan Grant
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 5.344

View more
  11 in total

1.  How Dissemination and Implementation Science Can Contribute to the Advancement of Learning Health Systems.

Authors:  Katy E Trinkley; P Michael Ho; Russell E Glasgow; Amy G Huebschmann
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2022-09-23       Impact factor: 7.840

2.  Research and Scholarly Methods: Implementation Science Studies.

Authors:  Grace M Kuo; Katy E Trinkley; Borsika Rabin
Journal:  J Am Coll Clin Pharm       Date:  2022-06-24

Review 3.  Data Velocity in HIV-Related Implementation Research: Estimating Time From Funding to Publication.

Authors:  Sheree R Schwartz; Joel Chavez Ortiz; Justin D Smith; Laura K Beres; Aaloke Mody; Ingrid Eshun-Wilson; Nanette Benbow; Deepthi P Mallela; Stephen Tan; Stefan Baral; Elvin Geng
Journal:  J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 3.771

4.  FAST: A Framework to Assess Speed of Translation of Health Innovations to Practice and Policy.

Authors:  Enola Proctor; Alex T Ramsey; Lisa Saldana; Thomas M Maddox; David A Chambers; Ross C Brownson
Journal:  Glob Implement Res Appl       Date:  2022-06-02

5.  Mindfulness and Understanding of Self-Care for Leaders of Extension: Promoting Well-Being for Health Educators and Their Clients.

Authors:  Anna Dysart; Samantha M Harden
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-05-13

6.  Cancer prevention, risk reduction, and control: opportunities for the next decade of health care delivery research.

Authors:  Denalee M O'Malley; Catherine M Alfano; Michelle Doose; Anita Y Kinney; Simon J Craddock Lee; Larissa Nekhlyudov; Paul Duberstein; Shawna V Hudson
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2021-11-30       Impact factor: 3.046

7.  Four strategic areas to advance equitable implementation of evidence-based practices in cancer care.

Authors:  Katharine A Rendle; Rinad S Beidas
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2021-11-30       Impact factor: 3.046

8.  Promises and pitfalls in implementation science from the perspective of US-based researchers: learning from a pre-mortem.

Authors:  Rinad S Beidas; Shannon Dorsey; Cara C Lewis; Aaron R Lyon; Byron J Powell; Jonathan Purtle; Lisa Saldana; Rachel C Shelton; Shannon Wiltsey Stirman; Meghan B Lane-Fall
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2022-08-13       Impact factor: 7.960

9.  Improving hypertension control and cardiovascular health: An urgent call to action for nursing.

Authors:  Judith A Hannan; Yvonne Commodore-Mensah; Natsuko Tokieda; Alison P Smith; Kate Sustersic Gawlik; Linda Murakami; Jennifer Cooper; Susan Koob; Kathy D Wright; Doreen Cassarino; Cynthia Arslanian-Engoren; Bernadette Mazurek Melnyk
Journal:  Worldviews Evid Based Nurs       Date:  2022-02-08       Impact factor: 4.347

10.  Priorities for improvement across cancer and non-cancer related preventive services among rural and non-rural clinicians.

Authors:  Michaela Brtnikova; Jamie L Studts; Elise Robertson; L Miriam Dickinson; Jennifer K Carroll; Alex H Krist; John T Cronin; Russell E Glasgow
Journal:  BMC Prim Care       Date:  2022-09-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.