Literature DB >> 25447960

Detection of triploid, molar, and vanishing twin pregnancies by a single-nucleotide polymorphism-based noninvasive prenatal test.

Kirsten J Curnow1, Louise Wilkins-Haug2, Allison Ryan1, Eser Kırkızlar1, Melissa Stosic1, Megan P Hall1, Styrmir Sigurjonsson1, Zachary Demko1, Matthew Rabinowitz1, Susan J Gross3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine the ability of single-nucleotide polymorphism-based noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) to identify triploid, unrecognized twin, and vanishing twin pregnancies. STUDY
DESIGN: The study included 30,795 consecutive reported clinical cases received for NIPT for fetal whole-chromosome aneuploidies; known multiple gestations were excluded. Cell-free DNA was isolated from maternal blood samples, amplified via 19,488-plex polymerase chain reaction, and sequenced. Sequencing results were analyzed to determine fetal chromosome copy number and to identify the presence of additional fetal haplotypes.
RESULTS: Additional fetal haplotypes, indicative of fetal triploidy, vanishing twin, or undetected twin pregnancy, were identified in 130 (0.42%) cases. Clinical confirmation (karyotype for singleton pregnancies, ultrasound for multifetal pregnancies) was available for 58.5% (76/130) of cases. Of the 76 cases with confirmation, 42.1% were vanishing twin, 48.7% were viable twin, 5.3% were diandric triploids, and 3.9% were nontriploid pregnancies that lacked evidence of co-twin demise. One pregnancy had other indications suggesting triploidy but lacked karyotype confirmation. Of the 5 vanishing twin cases with a known date of demise, 100% of losses occurred in the first trimester; up to 8 weeks elapsed between loss and detection by NIPT.
CONCLUSION: This single-nucleotide polymorphism-based NIPT successfully identified vanished twin, previously unrecognized twin, and triploid pregnancies. As vanishing twins are more likely to be aneuploid, and undetected residual cell-free DNA could bias NIPT results, the ability of this method to identify additional fetal haplotypes is expected to result in fewer false-positive calls and prevent incorrect fetal sex calls.
Copyright © 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  noninvasive prenatal testing; single-nucleotide polymorphism; triploidy; vanishing twin

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25447960     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.10.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  22 in total

Review 1.  Screening for fetal chromosomal and subchromosomal disorders.

Authors:  Sarah Harris; Dallas Reed; Neeta L Vora
Journal:  Semin Fetal Neonatal Med       Date:  2017-11-08       Impact factor: 3.926

2.  Maternal iAMP21 acute lymphoblastic leukemia detected on prenatal cell-free DNA genetic screening.

Authors:  Marlise R Luskin; Marie N Discenza; Sarah Rae Easter; Paola Dal Cin; Renius Owen; Bernard Ilagan; Meredith Masiello; Andrew A Lane
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2017-08-15

Review 3.  Calculation of Fetal Fraction for Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing.

Authors:  Matthew Cserhati
Journal:  BioTech (Basel)       Date:  2021-08-09

Review 4.  Cell-Free DNA Screening: Complexities and Challenges of Clinical Implementation.

Authors:  Matthew R Grace; Emily Hardisty; Sarah K Dotters-Katz; Neeta L Vora; Jeffrey A Kuller
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Surv       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 2.347

5.  Single Nucleotide Polymorphism-Based Noninvasive Prenatal Testing: Experience in India.

Authors:  Ishwar Chander Verma; Ratna Puri; Eswarachary Venkataswamy; Tulika Tayal; Sheela Nampoorthiri; Chitra Andrew; Madhulika Kabra; Rashmi Bagga; Mamatha Gowda; Meenu Batra; Sridevi Hegde; Anita Kaul; Neerja Gupta; Pallavi Mishra; Jayshree Ganapathi Subramanian; Shruti Lingaiah; Riyaz Akhtar; Francis Kidangan; R Chandran; C Kiran; G R Ravi Kumar; V L Ramprasad; Priya Kadam
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2018-01-25

6.  Diagnostic cytogenetic testing following positive noninvasive prenatal screening results: a clinical laboratory practice resource of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG).

Authors:  Athena M Cherry; Yassmine M Akkari; Kimberly M Barr; Hutton M Kearney; Nancy C Rose; Sarah T South; James H Tepperberg; Jeanne M Meck
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 8.822

7.  Noninvasive prenatal testing in the general obstetric population: clinical performance and counseling considerations in over 85 000 cases.

Authors:  Patricia A Taneja; Holly L Snyder; Eileen de Feo; Kristina M Kruglyak; Meredith Halks-Miller; Kirsten J Curnow; Sucheta Bhatt
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2016-01-27       Impact factor: 3.050

8.  Follow-up of multiple aneuploidies and single monosomies detected by noninvasive prenatal testing: implications for management and counseling.

Authors:  Holly L Snyder; Kirsten J Curnow; Sucheta Bhatt; Diana W Bianchi
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2016-02-08       Impact factor: 3.050

Review 9.  Recent advances in prenatal genetic screening and testing.

Authors:  Ignatia B Van den Veyver
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2016-10-28

10.  Chromosomal mosaicism: Origins and clinical implications in preimplantation and prenatal diagnosis.

Authors:  Brynn Levy; Eva R Hoffmann; Rajiv C McCoy; Francesca R Grati
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2021-03-22       Impact factor: 3.050

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.