Literature DB >> 25447574

Pediatric heart transplant waiting list mortality in the era of ventricular assist devices.

Farhan Zafar1, Chesney Castleberry2, Muhammad S Khan2, Vivek Mehta2, Roosevelt Bryant2, Angela Lorts2, Ivan Wilmot2, John L Jefferies2, Clifford Chin2, David L S Morales2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Earlier reviews have reported unacceptably high incidence of pediatric heart transplant (PHT) waiting list mortality. An increase in ventricular assist devices (VAD) suggests a potential positive effect. This study evaluated PHT waiting list mortality in the era of pediatric VADs.
METHODS: United Network of Organ Sharing (UNOS) database from 1999 to 2012 showed 5,532 pediatric candidates (aged ≤ 18 years) actively listed for PHT: 2,191 were listed in 1999 to 2004 (Era 1) and 3,341 were listed in 2005 to 2012 (Era 2).
RESULTS: Waiting list mortality was lower in Era 2 (8%) vs Era 1 (16%; p < 0.001). VAD therapy was used more frequently in Era 2 (16%) than in Era 1 (6%; p < 0.001) and was associated with better waiting list survival (p < 0.001). There were more UNOS Status 1A patients in Era 2 (80%) vs Era 1 (68%; p < 0.001). Independent predictors of waiting list mortality included weight < 10 kg (odds ratio [OR], 2.7 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1-6.9), congenital heart disease diagnosis (OR, 2.4; 95% CI, 1.9-3.0), blood type O (OR, 2.2; 95% CI, 1.8-2.8)], extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (OR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.1-2.2), mechanical ventilation (OR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.4-2.3), and renal dysfunction (OR 1.6; 95% CI, 1.2-2.0). Independent predictors of survival on the waiting list included VAD therapy (OR 4.2; 95% CI, 2.4-7.6), cardiomyopathy diagnosis (OR 3.3; 95% CI, 2.4-4.6), blood type A (OR, 2.2; 95% CI, 1.8-2.8), UNOS list Status 1B (OR, 1.9; 95% CI, 1.2-3.0), listed in Era 2 (OR 1.8; 95% CI, 1.4-2.2), and white race (OR 1.3; 95% CI, 1.1-1.6).
CONCLUSIONS: Despite an increase in the number of children listed as Status 1A, there was more than a 50% reduction in waiting list mortality in the new era. Irrespective of other factors, patients supported with a VAD were 4 times more likely to survive to transplant.
Copyright © 2015 International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Pediatric ventricular assist device; heart transplant waiting list; pediatric heart transplant; waiting list mortality

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25447574     DOI: 10.1016/j.healun.2014.09.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant        ISSN: 1053-2498            Impact factor:   10.247


  34 in total

1.  Modern Outcomes of Mechanical Circulatory Support as a Bridge to Pediatric Heart Transplantation.

Authors:  Brody Wehman; Kristen A Stafford; Gregory J Bittle; Zachary N Kon; Charles F Evans; Keshava Rajagopal; Nicholas Pietris; Sunjay Kaushal; Bartley P Griffith
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2016-02-22       Impact factor: 4.330

Review 2.  Cardiac transplantation in children.

Authors:  C S Black; A Khushnood; H Holtby; L Hepburn
Journal:  BJA Educ       Date:  2019-02-10

Review 3.  Closing in on the PumpKIN Trial of the Jarvik 2015 Ventricular Assist Device.

Authors:  J Timothy Baldwin; Iki Adachi; John Teal; Christopher A Almond; Robert D Jaquiss; M Patricia Massicotte; Kurt Dasse; Flora S Siami; Victor Zak; Jonathan R Kaltman; William T Mahle; Robert Jarvik
Journal:  Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Pediatr Card Surg Annu       Date:  2017-01

4.  Survival Without Cardiac Transplantation Among Children With Dilated Cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Rakesh K Singh; Charles E Canter; Ling Shi; Steven D Colan; Debra A Dodd; Melanie D Everitt; Daphne T Hsu; John L Jefferies; Paul F Kantor; Elfriede Pahl; Joseph W Rossano; Jeffrey A Towbin; James D Wilkinson; Steven E Lipshultz
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2017-11-28       Impact factor: 24.094

5.  Medical and end-of-life decision making in adolescents' pre-heart transplant: A descriptive pilot study.

Authors:  Melissa K Cousino; Victoria A Miller; Cynthia Smith; Karen Uzark; Ray Lowery; Nichole Rottach; Elizabeth D Blume; Kurt R Schumacher
Journal:  Palliat Med       Date:  2019-10-24       Impact factor: 4.762

6.  Pediatric heart transplantation: advancing the field into the future.

Authors:  Justin Godown; Shawn C West
Journal:  Transl Pediatr       Date:  2019-10

Review 7.  Collaboration and new data in ACTION: a learning health care system to improve pediatric heart failure and ventricular assist device outcomes.

Authors:  David M Peng; David N Rosenthal; Farhan Zafar; Lauren Smyth; Christina J VanderPluym; Angela Lorts
Journal:  Transl Pediatr       Date:  2019-10

8.  Outcomes of children with congenital heart disease implanted with ventricular assist devices: An analysis of the Pediatric Interagency Registry for Mechanical Circulatory Support (Pedimacs).

Authors:  David M Peng; Devin A Koehl; Ryan S Cantor; Kristen N McMillan; Aliessa P Barnes; Patrick I McConnell; Jessica Jordan; Nicholas D Andersen; James D St Louis; Katsuhide Maeda; James K Kirklin; Steven J Kindel
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2018-10-31       Impact factor: 10.247

9.  Association Between Hematologic and Inflammatory Markers and 31 Thrombotic and Hemorrhagic Events in Berlin Heart Excor Patients.

Authors:  Amit Iyengar; Matthew L Hung; Kian Asanad; Oh Jin Kwon; Nicholas J Jackson; Brian L Reemtsen; Myke D Federman; Reshma M Biniwale
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2017-02-10       Impact factor: 1.655

Review 10.  Pediatric ventricular assist device registries: update and perspectives in the era of miniaturized continuous-flow pumps.

Authors:  Kevin M Lichtenstein; Hari P Tunuguntla; David M Peng; Holger Buchholz; Jennifer Conway
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2021-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.