Melissa K Cousino1,2,3, Victoria A Miller4, Cynthia Smith3, Karen Uzark1,3, Ray Lowery3, Nichole Rottach3, Elizabeth D Blume5, Kurt R Schumacher1,2,3. 1. Department of Pediatrics, Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. 2. University of Michigan Transplant Center, Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. 3. Congenital Heart Center, C.S. Mott Children's Hospital, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. 4. Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA. 5. Department of Cardiology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Adolescents and young adults undergoing heart transplantation experience risks of morbidity and mortality both pre- and post-transplant. To improve end-of-life care for this population, it is necessary to understand their medical and end-of-life decision-making preferences. AIM: (1) To examine adolescent/young adult decision-making involvement specific to heart transplant listing, and (2) to characterize their preferences specific to medical and end-of-life decision making. DESIGN: This cross-sectional research study utilized survey methods. Data were collected from October 2016 to March 2018. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: Twelve adolescent and young adult patients listed for heart transplant (ages = 12-19 years) and one parent for each were enrolled at a single-center, US children's hospital. RESULTS: Consistent with their preferences, the majority of adolescent/young adult participants (82%) perceived a high level of involvement in the decision to be listed for transplant. Patient involvement in this decision was primarily by way of seeking advice or information from their parents and being asked to express their opinion from parents. Despite a preference among patients to discuss their prognosis and be involved in end-of-life decision making if seriously ill, only 42% of patients had discussed their end-of-life wishes with anyone. Few parents recounted having such discussions. Preferences regarding the timing and nature of end-of-life decision-making discussions varied. CONCLUSIONS: Although young people are involved in the decision to pursue heart transplantation, little attention is paid to involving them in discussions regarding end-of-life decision making in a manner that is consistent with individual preferences.
BACKGROUND: Adolescents and young adults undergoing heart transplantation experience risks of morbidity and mortality both pre- and post-transplant. To improve end-of-life care for this population, it is necessary to understand their medical and end-of-life decision-making preferences. AIM: (1) To examine adolescent/young adult decision-making involvement specific to heart transplant listing, and (2) to characterize their preferences specific to medical and end-of-life decision making. DESIGN: This cross-sectional research study utilized survey methods. Data were collected from October 2016 to March 2018. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: Twelve adolescent and young adult patients listed for heart transplant (ages = 12-19 years) and one parent for each were enrolled at a single-center, US children's hospital. RESULTS: Consistent with their preferences, the majority of adolescent/young adult participants (82%) perceived a high level of involvement in the decision to be listed for transplant. Patient involvement in this decision was primarily by way of seeking advice or information from their parents and being asked to express their opinion from parents. Despite a preference among patients to discuss their prognosis and be involved in end-of-life decision making if seriously ill, only 42% of patients had discussed their end-of-life wishes with anyone. Few parents recounted having such discussions. Preferences regarding the timing and nature of end-of-life decision-making discussions varied. CONCLUSIONS: Although young people are involved in the decision to pursue heart transplantation, little attention is paid to involving them in discussions regarding end-of-life decision making in a manner that is consistent with individual preferences.
Entities:
Keywords:
Child; advance care planning; decision making; heart transplantation
Authors: Joseph G Rogers; Chetan B Patel; Robert J Mentz; Bradi B Granger; Karen E Steinhauser; Mona Fiuzat; Patricia A Adams; Adam Speck; Kimberly S Johnson; Arun Krishnamoorthy; Hongqiu Yang; Kevin J Anstrom; Gwen C Dodson; Donald H Taylor; Jerry L Kirchner; Daniel B Mark; Christopher M O'Connor; James A Tulsky Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2017-07-18 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: S A Hunt; D W Baker; M H Chin; M P Cinquegrani; A M Feldman; G S Francis; T G Ganiats; S Goldstein; G Gregoratos; M L Jessup; R J Noble; M Packer; M A Silver; L W Stevenson; R J Gibbons; E M Antman; J S Alpert; D P Faxon; V Fuster; A K Jacobs; L F Hiratzka; R O Russell; S C Smith Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2001-12 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Steven A Webber; David C Naftel; F Jay Fricker; Pamela Olesnevich; Elizabeth D Blume; Linda Addonizio; James K Kirklin; Charles E Canter Journal: Lancet Date: 2006-01-21 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Emily M Balkin; Joanne Wolfe; Sonja I Ziniel; Peter Lang; Ravi Thiagarajan; Shay Dillis; Francis Fynn-Thompson; Elizabeth D Blume Journal: J Palliat Med Date: 2014-12-10 Impact factor: 2.947
Authors: S Schubert; H Abdul-Khaliq; H B Lehmkuhl; M Yegitbasi; P Reinke; C Kebelmann-Betzig; K Hauptmann; U Gross-Wieltsch; R Hetzer; F Berger Journal: Pediatr Transplant Date: 2008-06-01
Authors: Melissa K Cousino; Heang M Lim; Cynthia Smith; Sunkyung Yu; Ray Lowery; Suzanne Viers; Amanda D McCormick; David M Peng; Karen Uzark; Kurt R Schumacher Journal: Pediatr Cardiol Date: 2022-04-04 Impact factor: 1.838