| Literature DB >> 25443884 |
Anthony Herbert1, Gemma L Jones2, Eileen Ingham2, John Fisher3.
Abstract
The decellularisation of xenogenic and allogeneic biological grafts offers a promising solution to replacement of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL). The purpose of this investigation was to determine the biomechanical effects of additional fat reduction and bioburden reduction steps in the decellularisation of porcine super flexor tendon (pSFT). Study 1 investigated the use of acetone or chloroform-methanol as a fat reduction agent. The most effective of these was then carried forward into Study 2, which investigated the use of antibiotics or peracetic acid (PAA) as a bioburden reduction agent. Stress relaxation data was analysed using a Maxwell-Wiechert viscoelastic model and, in addition to classical material properties, the tangent modulus of the toe-region was determined from strength testing data. In both studies, the majority of decellularised groups demonstrated no statistical differences for material properties such as tensile strength and Young's modulus compared to native controls. Different trends were observed for many of the viscoelastic parameters, but also for the tangent modulus in the toe-region indicating a change in performance at low strains. The most severe deviations from the profile of the native tangent modulus were found to occur in Study 2 when PAA was used for bioburden reduction. Classic material properties (E, UTS etc.) are often used to compare the characteristics of native and decellularised tissues, however they may not highlight changes occurring in the tissues at low strains. In this study, this represented the physiological strains encountered by substitute acellular ACL grafts. Acetone was chosen as the fat reduction step whereas, antibiotics was preferable over PAA as a bioburden reduction step.Entities:
Keywords: Acellular graft; Anterior cruciate ligament; Decellularisation; Knee reconstruction; Porcine
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25443884 PMCID: PMC4295818 DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2014.11.013
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Biomech ISSN: 0021-9290 Impact factor: 2.712
Fig. 1(a) Study 1: the inclusion of acetone or chloroform–methanol as a fat reduction step, (b) Study 2: the inclusion of peracetic acid or antibiotics as a bio-burden reduction step and how these performed with/without peracetic acid as a terminal sterilant.
Fig. 2Experimental set-up for stress relaxation testing: (a) schematic of tissue grips including void for dry ice, (b) a decellularised specimen is processed to a dumbbell shape and (c) specimen is mounted in the grips and subjected to testing.
Fig. 3The experimental stress–strain data was fitted to a 3rd order Gaussian function from which the first and second derivatives were calculated. The first location at which the second derivative was zero was interpreted as the transition point from the toe-region into the linear-region. The third location at which the second derivative was zero was interpreted to mark the end of the linear-region.
Study 1: results from stress relaxation testing (mean ±95% CI). Superscripts indicate significance—groups that do not share the same letter are significantly different (1-way ANOVA with Tukey post-hoc analysis). DC1: decellularisation process without any fat reduction treatment, ACE: acetone treatment, CM: chloroform–methanol treatment.
| Group | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Native | 71.67±7.37 | 12.77±1.11 | 11.98±3.87 | 4.57±0.63 | 147.03±11.73 |
| DC1 | 40.71±2.64 | 6.06±1.12 | 6.89±1.70 | 5.47±0.50 | 122.10±10.32 |
| DC1+ACE | 42.14±7.32 | 6.63±1.68 | 7.33±1.89 | 5.04±0.89 | 133.90±13.88 |
| DC1+CM | 41.75±3.82 | 5.68±1.39 | 6.22±1.46 | 5.97±0.47 | 114.92±10.12 |
Study 1: results from strength testing (mean ±95% CI). Superscripts indicate significance—groups that do not share the same letter are significantly different (1-way ANOVA with Tukey post-hoc analysis). DC1: decellularisation process without any fat reduction treatment, ACE: acetone treatment, CM: chloroform–methanol treatment.
| Group | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Native | 9.83±1.68 | 0.086±0.001 | 0.40±0.12 | 50.63±3.19 | 19.97±5.27 | 52.22±4.62 | 235.15±31.56 | 0.315±0.028 |
| DC1 | 11.30±1.96 | 0.112±0.018 | 1.05±0.25 | 36.81±7.39 | 39.08±16.01 | 40.83±6.48 | 202.04±22.41 | 0.297±0.023 |
| DC1+ACE | 14.22±4.07 | 0.096±0.005 | 1.11±0.29 | 37.77±5.54 | 40.72±5.68 | 46.41±7.60 | 211.29±24.89 | 0.297±0.023 |
| DC1+CM | 12.30±2.61 | 0.116±0.022 | 0.93±0.27 | 37.81±10.96 | 34.54±14.30 | 39.01±8.10 | 200.67±34.63 | 0.280±0.023 |
Fig. 4The mean tangent modulus (constructed using the mean values for parameters A and B) during the early phase of loading in the toe-region for the groups in (a) Study 1 and (b) Study 2. In each case the profile terminates at the transition strain (ε). ACE: acetone treatment, CM: chloroform–methanol treatment, TPAA: terminal peracetic acid treatment, PAAbio: peracetic acid bioburden treatment, ABbio: antibiotic bioburden treatment.
Study 2: results from stress relaxation testing (mean ±95% CI). Superscripts indicate significance—groups that do not share the same letter are significantly different (1-way ANOVA with Tukey post-hoc analysis). DC2: decellularisation process with acetone permanently included, TPAA: terminal peracetic acid treatment, PAAbio: peracetic acid bioburden treatment, ABbio: antibiotic bioburden treatment.
| Group | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Native | 71.67±7.37 | 12.77±1.11 | 11.98±3.87 | 4.57±0.63 | 147.03±11.73 |
| DC2+TPAA | 42.14±7.32 | 6.63±1.68 | 7.33±1.89 | 5.04±0.89 | 133.90±13.88 |
| DC2−TPAA | 55.66±4.48 | 5.67±1.08 | 4.09±1.27 | 4.82±0.92 | 124.42±17.97 |
| DC2+PAAbio+TPAA | 30.22±3.84 | 3.86±1.79 | 2.75±0.88 | 5.95±0.79 | 112.20±12.75 |
| DC2+PAAbio−TPAA | 29.63±6.97 | 3.44±1.02 | 2.26±0.36 | 6.01±0.42 | 111.06±9.90 |
| DC2+ABbio+TPAA | 48.45±6.72 | 6.26±1.45 | 3.94±0.72 | 6.64±1.49 | 133.32±17.96 |
| DC2+ABbio−TPAA | 41.82±4.00 | 5.02±0.78 | 3.76±0.51 | 5.87±0.33 | 104.99±10.37 |
Study 2: results from strength testing (mean ±95% CI). Superscripts indicate significance—groups that do not share the same letter are significantly different (1-way ANOVA with Tukey post-hoc analysis). DC2: decellularisation process with acetone permanently included, TPAA: terminal peracetic acid treatment, PAAbio: peracetic acid bioburden treatment, ABbio: antibiotic bioburden treatment.
| Group | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Native | 9.83±1.68 | 0.086±0.001 | 0.40±0.12 | 50.63±3.19 | 19.97±5.27 | 52.22±4.62 | 235.15±31.56 | 0.315±0.028 |
| DC2+TPAA | 14.22±4.07 | 0.096±0.005 | 1.11±0.29 | 37.77±5.54 | 40.72±5.68 | 46.41±7.60 | 211.29±24.89 | 0.297±0.023 |
| DC2−TPAA | 15.72±4.12 | 0.107±0.016 | 1.28±0.57 | 36.06±8.24 | 41.80±12.49 | 45.67±1.06 | 232.89±15.33 | 0.276±0.013 |
| DC2+PAAbio+TPAA | 16.94±3.40 | 0.148±0.031 | 0.94±0.39 | 30.68±10.33 | 23.67±4.98 | 51.12±8.12 | 240.92±38.18 | 0.312±0.030 |
| DC2+PAAbio−TPAA | 18.21±1.48 | 0.153±0.024 | 0.91±0.66 | 29.12±3.05 | 25.26±16.70 | 49.94±5.10 | 266.27±43.65 | 0.313±0.023 |
| DC2+ABbio+TPAA | 18.19±3.58 | 0.120±0.021 | 1.24±0.53 | 33.53±5.86 | 38.26±11.26 | 65.18±9.70 | 317.13±43.78 | 0.292±0.028 |
| DC2+ABbio−TPAA | 18.53±3.29 | 0.116±0.021 | 1.26±0.53 | 34.77±5.78 | 40.14±10.97 | 61.52±4.53 | 296.77±25.59 | 0.267±0.018 |