Literature DB >> 25441964

Disparities persist in nutrition policies and practices in Minnesota secondary schools.

Caitlin E Caspi, Cynthia Davey, Toben F Nelson, Nicole Larson, Martha Y Kubik, Brandon Coombes, Marilyn S Nanney.   

Abstract

Access to healthy foods among secondary school students is patterned by individual-level socioeconomic status, but few studies have examined how school nutrition policies and practices are patterned by school-level characteristics. The objective of our study was to examine school nutrition policies and practices by school characteristics (eg, location, racial/ethnic composition, and free/reduced priced lunch eligibility) in Minnesota secondary schools between 2008 and 2012. Data from the 2008 to 2012 Minnesota School Health Profiles survey were used to assess school nutrition policies and practices, and National Center for Educational Statistics data were used for school characteristics (n=505 secondary schools). Nutrition policies and practices included the availability of low-nutrient, energy dense (LNED) items, strategies to engage students in healthy eating, and restrictions on advertisements of LNED products in areas around the school. Among school-level characteristics, school location was most strongly related to school nutrition policies. Across all years, city schools were less likely than town/rural schools to have vending machines/school stores (prevalence difference [PD] -13.7, 95% CI -25.0 to -2.3), and less likely to sell sport drinks (PD -36.3, 95% CI -51.8 to -20.7). City schools were also more likely to prohibit advertisements for LNED products in school buildings (PD 17.7, 95% CI 5.5 to 29.9) and on school grounds (PD 15.6, 95% CI 1.7 to 29.5). Between 2008 and 2012, the prevalence of some healthy eating policies/practices (eg, limiting salty snacks, offering taste testing, and banning unhealthy food advertisements in school publications) declined in city schools only, where these policies/practices had previously been more common. Monitoring of these trends is needed to understand the influence of these policies on student outcomes across school settings.
Copyright © 2015 Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adolescent obesity; Health disparities; Nutrition-related policies; Rural health; Secondary schools

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25441964      PMCID: PMC4344858          DOI: 10.1016/j.jand.2014.08.029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acad Nutr Diet        ISSN: 2212-2672            Impact factor:   4.910


  24 in total

1.  Correlation between high risk obesity groups and low socioeconomic status in school children.

Authors:  Victor R Vieweg; Christopher H Johnston; Jack O Lanier; Antony Fernandez; Anand K Pandurangi
Journal:  South Med J       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 0.954

2.  Variation in obesity among American secondary school students by school and school characteristics.

Authors:  Patrick M O'Malley; Lloyd D Johnston; Jorge Delva; Jerald G Bachman; John E Schulenberg
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 5.043

3.  Availability of more-healthy and less-healthy food choices in American schools: a national study of grade, racial/ethnic, and socioeconomic differences.

Authors:  Jorge Delva; Patrick M O'Malley; Lloyd D Johnston
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 5.043

4.  The third School Nutrition Dietary Assessment Study: findings and policy implications for improving the health of US children.

Authors:  Mary Story
Journal:  J Am Diet Assoc       Date:  2009-02

5.  State school nutrition and physical activity policy environments and youth obesity.

Authors:  Marilyn S Nanney; Toben Nelson; Melanie Wall; Tarek Haddad; Martha Kubik; Melissa Nelson Laska; Mary Story
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 5.043

6.  Are 'competitive foods' sold at school making our children fat?

Authors:  Nicole Larson; Mary Story
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2010 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.301

7.  Rising social inequalities in US childhood obesity, 2003-2007.

Authors:  Gopal K Singh; Mohammad Siahpush; Michael D Kogan
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 3.797

8.  School level contextual factors are associated with the weight status of adolescent males and females.

Authors:  Tracy K Richmond; S V Subramanian
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2008-03-13       Impact factor: 5.002

9.  Poverty-related factors associated with obesity prevention policies in Utah secondary schools.

Authors:  Marilyn S Nanney; Claudia Bohner; Michael Friedrichs
Journal:  J Am Diet Assoc       Date:  2008-07

10.  Evaluating the distribution of school wellness policies and practices: a framework to capture equity among schools serving the most weight-vulnerable children.

Authors:  Marilyn S Nanney; Cynthia Davey
Journal:  J Am Diet Assoc       Date:  2008-09
View more
  13 in total

1.  A Low-Cost, Grab-and-Go Breakfast Intervention for Rural High School Students: Changes in School Breakfast Program Participation Among At-Risk Students in Minnesota.

Authors:  Nicole Larson; Qi Wang; Katherine Grannon; Susan Wei; Marilyn S Nanney; Caitlin Caspi
Journal:  J Nutr Educ Behav       Date:  2017-09-23       Impact factor: 3.045

2.  Disparities in Supports for Student Wellness Promotion Efforts Among Secondary Schools in Minnesota.

Authors:  Nicole Larson; Michael O'Connell; Cynthia S Davey; Caitlin Caspi; Martha Y Kubik; Marilyn S Nanney
Journal:  J Sch Health       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 2.118

Review 3.  The School Food Environment and Obesity Prevention: Progress Over the Last Decade.

Authors:  Emily Welker; Megan Lott; Mary Story
Journal:  Curr Obes Rep       Date:  2016-06

4.  School Obesity Prevention Policies and Practices in Minnesota and Student Outcomes: A Longitudinal Cohort Study.

Authors:  Marilyn S Nanney; Richard F MacLehose; Martha Y Kubik; Cynthia S Davey; Michael J O'Connell; Katherine Y Grannon; Toben F Nelson
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2016-06-16       Impact factor: 5.043

5.  School Breakfast Program Participation and Rural Adolescents' Purchasing Behaviors in Food Stores and Restaurants.

Authors:  Caitlin Eicher Caspi; Qi Wang; Amy Shanafelt; Nicole Larson; Susan Wei; Mary O Hearst; Marilyn S Nanney
Journal:  J Sch Health       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 2.118

6.  Evidence-based policies on school nutrition and physical education: Associations with state-level collaboration, obesity, and socio-economic indicators.

Authors:  Jennifer E Pelletier; Melissa N Laska; Richard MacLehose; Toben F Nelson; Marilyn S Nanney
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2017-02-13       Impact factor: 4.018

7.  A randomized study of food pantry environment-level change following the SuperShelf intervention.

Authors:  Caitlin Caspi; Nora Gordon; Christina Bliss Barsness; Laura Bohen; Marna Canterbury; Hikaru Peterson; Julian Wolfson; Rebekah Pratt
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2022-06-06       Impact factor: 3.626

8.  A comparison of the vending environment among three rural subtypes of secondary schools.

Authors:  Rebecca Kehm; Cynthia S Davey; Martha Y Kubik; Marilyn S Nanney
Journal:  J Hunger Environ Nutr       Date:  2016-04-25

9.  Dietary Quality of Diverse, Rural Adolescents Using the Healthy Eating Index - 2010.

Authors:  Mary O Hearst; Lisa J Harnack; Qi Wang; Marilyn S Nanney
Journal:  Health Behav Policy Rev       Date:  2016-11

10.  Differences in Food and Beverage Marketing Policies and Practices in US School Districts, by Demographic Characteristics of School Districts, 2012.

Authors:  Caitlin L Merlo; Shannon Michael; Nancy D Brener; Edward Coffield; Beverly S Kingsley; Deena Zytnick; Heidi Blanck
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2016-12-15       Impact factor: 2.830

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.