Lindsay M Sabik1, Wafa W Tarazi2, Cathy J Bradley2. 1. Department of Healthcare Policy and Research, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, Virginia. Electronic address: lsabik@vcu.edu. 2. Department of Healthcare Policy and Research, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, Virginia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: There are substantial disparities in breast and cervical cancer screening that stem from lack of health insurance. Although the Affordable Care Act (ACA) expands insurance coverage to many Americans, there are differences in availability of Medicaid coverage across states. PURPOSE: To understand the potential impact of Medicaid expansions on disparities in preventive care for low-income women by assessing pre-ACA breast and cervical cancer screening across states currently expanding and not expanding Medicaid to low-income adults. METHODS: Data from the 2012 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (analyzed in 2014) were used to consider differences in demographics among women for whom screening is recommended, including income and race/ethnicity, across expansion and nonexpansion states. Self-reported screening was compared by state expansion status overall, for the uninsured, and for low-income women. Logistic regressions were estimated to assess differences in self-reported screening across expansion and nonexpansion states controlling for demographics. RESULTS: Women in states that are not expanding Medicaid had significantly lower odds of receiving recommended mammograms (OR=0.87, 95% CI=0.79, 0.95) or Pap tests (OR=0.87, 95% CI=0.79, 0.95). The difference was larger among the uninsured (OR=0.72, 95% CI=0.56, 0.91 for mammography; OR=0.78, 95% CI=0.65, 0.94 for Pap tests). CONCLUSIONS: As women in nonexpansion states remain uninsured and others gain coverage, existing disparities in cancer screening by race and socioeconomic status are likely to widen. Health risks and associated costs to underserved populations must be taken into account in ongoing debates over expansion.
BACKGROUND: There are substantial disparities in breast and cervical cancer screening that stem from lack of health insurance. Although the Affordable Care Act (ACA) expands insurance coverage to many Americans, there are differences in availability of Medicaid coverage across states. PURPOSE: To understand the potential impact of Medicaid expansions on disparities in preventive care for low-income women by assessing pre-ACA breast and cervical cancer screening across states currently expanding and not expanding Medicaid to low-income adults. METHODS: Data from the 2012 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (analyzed in 2014) were used to consider differences in demographics among women for whom screening is recommended, including income and race/ethnicity, across expansion and nonexpansion states. Self-reported screening was compared by state expansion status overall, for the uninsured, and for low-income women. Logistic regressions were estimated to assess differences in self-reported screening across expansion and nonexpansion states controlling for demographics. RESULTS:Women in states that are not expanding Medicaid had significantly lower odds of receiving recommended mammograms (OR=0.87, 95% CI=0.79, 0.95) or Pap tests (OR=0.87, 95% CI=0.79, 0.95). The difference was larger among the uninsured (OR=0.72, 95% CI=0.56, 0.91 for mammography; OR=0.78, 95% CI=0.65, 0.94 for Pap tests). CONCLUSIONS: As women in nonexpansion states remain uninsured and others gain coverage, existing disparities in cancer screening by race and socioeconomic status are likely to widen. Health risks and associated costs to underserved populations must be taken into account in ongoing debates over expansion.
Authors: Lee S Caplan; David V McQueen; Judith R Qualters; Marilyn Leff; Carol Garrett; Ned Calonge Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2003-11 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: R G Roetzheim; N Pal; C Tennant; L Voti; J Z Ayanian; A Schwabe; J P Krischer Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 1999-08-18 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Florence K L Tangka; Brett O'Hara; James G Gardner; Joanna Turner; Janet Royalty; Kate Shaw; Susan Sabatino; Ingrid J Hall; Ralph J Coates Journal: Cancer Causes Control Date: 2010-04-02 Impact factor: 2.506
Authors: Tong Gan; Heather F Sinner; Samuel C Walling; Quan Chen; Bin Huang; Tom C Tucker; Jitesh A Patel; B Mark Evers; Avinash S Bhakta Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2019-02-22 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: Justin G Trogdon; Donatus U Ekwueme; Diana Poehler; Cheryll C Thomas; Katherine Reeder-Hayes; Benjamin T Allaire Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2017-07-12 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Bettina M Beech; Tristan Cordier; Laura E Happe; Laura Trunk; Gilbert S Haugh; Richard Kwong; Vipin Gopal; Roy A Beveridge Journal: Am Health Drug Benefits Date: 2017-04
Authors: Kelsey L Corrigan; Leticia Nogueira; K Robin Yabroff; Chun Chieh Lin; Xuesong Han; Junzo P Chino; Anna E Coghill; Meredith Shiels; Ahmedin Jemal; Gita Suneja Journal: Cancer Date: 2019-11-11 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Bill J Wright; Alison K Conlin; Heidi L Allen; Jennifer Tsui; Matthew J Carlson; Hsin Fang Li Journal: Cancer Date: 2015-12-09 Impact factor: 6.860