Literature DB >> 14652278

Validity of women's self-reports of cancer screening test utilization in a managed care population.

Lee S Caplan1, David V McQueen, Judith R Qualters, Marilyn Leff, Carol Garrett, Ned Calonge.   

Abstract

This study was undertaken to examine the validity of self-reported data on breast and cervical cancer screening behavior. An abbreviated version of the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System telephone survey, including questions on mammography, clinical breast examination (CBE), and Papanicolaou test utilization, was administered to a sample of 480 women aged 40-74 years, enrolled in Kaiser Permanente Colorado for at least 5 years. Screening information reported in the telephone interview was compared with that abstracted from respondents' medical records. The vast majority of women had a mammogram, CBE, and Pap test according to both self-report and medical record. Sensitivity for determining whether her last test was within 2 years (3 years for Pap test) exceeded 95% for all, whereas specificities were <55%. The percentage of overall agreement between self-reported and recorded information was 88.4% (kappa = 0.62) for mammography, 87.9% (kappa = 0.45) for CBE, and 87.2% (kappa = 0.54) for Pap test. Pearson correlations between self-reported and recorded information for specific time interval since most recent mammogram, CBE, and Pap test were 0.72, 0.58, and 0.65, respectively. Correlation increased greatly when time interval was allowed to vary by +/-1 year. In most cases of disagreement, the self-report underestimated the time since last screening. These results suggest that self-reporting of breast and cervical cancer screening is fairly accurate in this managed care population, although women tend to underestimate the time since their last screening.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14652278

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  83 in total

1.  Screening and surveillance for second malignant neoplasms in adult survivors of childhood cancer: a report from the childhood cancer survivor study.

Authors:  Paul Craig Nathan; Kirsten Kimberlie Ness; Martin Christopher Mahoney; Zhenghong Li; Melissa Maria Hudson; Jennifer Sylene Ford; Wendy Landier; Marilyn Stovall; Gregory Thomas Armstrong; Tara Olive Henderson; Leslie L Robison; Kevin Charles Oeffinger
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2010-10-05       Impact factor: 25.391

2.  Disparities in routine breast cancer screening for Medicaid managed care members with a work-limiting disability.

Authors:  Sharada Weir; Heather E Posner; Jianying Zhang; Whitney C Jones; Georgianna Willis; Jeffrey D Baxter; Robin E Clark
Journal:  Medicare Medicaid Res Rev       Date:  2011-11-04

3.  Influence of health insurance coverage on breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening in rural primary care settings.

Authors:  Patricia A Carney; Jean O'Malley; David I Buckley; Motomi Mori; David A Lieberman; Lyle J Fagnan; James Wallace; Betty Liu; Cynthia Morris
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2012-05-30       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Recent trends in breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening test utilization in Canada, using self-reported data from 2008 and 2012.

Authors:  D Major; D Armstrong; H Bryant; W Cheung; K Decker; G Doyle; V Mai; C M McLachlin; J Niu; J Payne; N Shukla
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 3.677

5.  Screening behavior in women at increased familial risk for breast cancer.

Authors:  Yoland C Antill; John Reynolds; Mary Anne Young; Judy A Kirk; Katherine M Tucker; Tarli L Bogtstra; Shirley S Wong; Tracy E Dudding; Juliana L Di Iulio; Kelly-Anne Phillips
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2006-07-07       Impact factor: 2.375

6.  Laws requiring health plans to provide direct access to obstetricians and gynecologists, and use of cancer screening by women.

Authors:  Laurence C Baker; Jia Chan
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.402

7.  Factors influencing breast cancer screening in low-income African Americans in Tennessee.

Authors:  Kushal Patel; Mohamed Kanu; Jianguo Liu; Brea Bond; Elizabeth Brown; Elizabeth Williams; Rosemary Theriot; Stephanie Bailey; Maureen Sanderson; Margaret Hargreaves
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2014-10

8.  The impact of breast cancer knowledge and attitudes on screening and early detection among an immigrant Iranian population in southern California.

Authors:  L Kobeissi; G Samari; D Telesca; M Esfandiari; O Galal
Journal:  J Relig Health       Date:  2014-12

9.  Self-report versus medical records for assessing cancer-preventive services delivery.

Authors:  Jeanne M Ferrante; Pamela Ohman-Strickland; Karissa A Hahn; Shawna V Hudson; Eric K Shaw; Jesse C Crosson; Benjamin F Crabtree
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.254

10.  Method of detection of breast cancer in low-income women.

Authors:  Amardeep Thind; Allison Diamant; Lalima Hoq; Rose Maly
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 2.681

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.