Literature DB >> 23465175

Compliance with long-term surveillance recommendations following endovascular aneurysm repair or type B aortic dissection.

Marcus R Kret1, Amir F Azarbal, Erica L Mitchell, Timothy K Liem, Gregory J Landry, Gregory L Moneta.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Lifelong surveillance is recommended for both endovascular aneurysm repair and acute, uncomplicated type B thoracic aortic dissection, though compliance remains a significant challenge. We sought to determine factors associated with failure to obtain recommended surveillance.
METHODS: Patients surviving to discharge who had endovascular repair of thoracic (thoracic endovascular aortic aneurysm repair [TEVAR]) or abdominal aortic aneurysms (endovascular aortic aneurysm repair [EVAR]) or medical management for type B dissections from 2004-2011 were reviewed. Primary end points were compliance with follow-up and need for reintervention. Comorbidities examined included coronary artery disease, congestive heart failure, hypertension, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes, and chronic kidney disease. Socioeconomic factors examined were age, sex, distance from hospital, discharge destination (ie, home or skilled nursing facility), and insurance type. Endoleak and sac expansion were recorded, as were complications, including endograft migration, infection or thrombosis, and aneurysm degeneration.
RESULTS: Two hundred four patients, median age 71.9 years, were identified; 171 had EVAR and 33 had type B dissection. EVAR patients included 45 thoracic, 100 abdominal, and 12 thoracoabdominal endografts, as well as 7 iliac artery aneurysm repairs and 7 proximal/distal graft extensions. Median follow-up was 28 ± 10.5 months. Overall, 56% were lost to follow-up, whereas 11% never returned for surveillance after initial hospitalization. Follow-up was compared for each of the comorbidities and socioeconomic factors; none were found to significantly affect follow-up. The known complication rate was 9.3% (n = 19), with reintervention performed in 14% of EVAR/TEVAR patients. Thirty-eight percent of medically managed patients with type B dissections eventually required surgical intervention. All-cause 5-year mortality was 27% as determined by the Social Security Death Index.
CONCLUSIONS: Despite a significant rate of reintervention following EVAR, TEVAR, and type B dissection, long-term compliance with surveillance is limited. In addition, predicting who is at risk of being lost to follow-up remains difficult. If current recommendations for lifelong surveillance are to be followed, coordinated protocols are required to capture EVAR, TEVAR, and type B dissection patients to ensure optimal follow-up for these patients. However, the lack of survival benefit in those with complete follow-up suggests that further study is needed with regard to ideal duration of long-term follow-up.
Copyright © 2013 Society for Vascular Surgery. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23465175     DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2012.12.046

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Surg        ISSN: 0741-5214            Impact factor:   4.268


  15 in total

Review 1.  Diagnosis and management of acute aortic syndromes: dissection, intramural hematoma, and penetrating aortic ulcer.

Authors:  Marc P Bonaca; Patrick T O'Gara
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 2.931

2.  Late Radiological and Clinical Outcomes of Traumatic Thoracic Aortic Injury Managed with Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair.

Authors:  M Khashram; Q He; T H Oh; A Khanafer; I A Wright; T M Vasudevan; A S N Lo; J A Roake; I Civil
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 3.  Acute type B aortic dissection: insights from the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection.

Authors:  Akshar Y Patel; Kim A Eagle; Prashant Vaishnava
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2014-07

4.  Endovascular aneurysm repair patients who are lost to follow-up have worse outcomes.

Authors:  Caitlin W Hicks; Devin S Zarkowsky; Ian C Bostock; David H Stone; James H Black; Jens Eldrup-Jorgensen; Philip P Goodney; Mahmoud B Malas
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2017-02-16       Impact factor: 4.268

5.  Association of Quality Improvement Registry Participation With Appropriate Follow-up After Vascular Procedures.

Authors:  Benjamin S. Brooke; Adam W. Beck; Larry W. Kraiss; Andrew W. Hoel; Andrea M. Austin; Amir A. Ghaffarian; Jack L. Cronenwett; Philip P. Goodney
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 14.766

6.  Compliance of postendovascular aortic aneurysm repair imaging surveillance.

Authors:  Ali F AbuRahma; Michael Yacoub; Stephen M Hass; Joseph AbuRahma; Albeir Y Mousa; L Scott Dean; Ravi Viradia; Patrick A Stone
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2016-01-09       Impact factor: 4.268

7.  Follow-up compliance after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in Medicare beneficiaries.

Authors:  Andres Schanzer; Louis M Messina; Kaushik Ghosh; Jessica P Simons; William P Robinson; Francesco A Aiello; Robert J Goldberg; Allison B Rosen
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2014-11-01       Impact factor: 4.268

8.  Any Postoperative Surveillance Improves Survival after Endovascular Repair of Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms.

Authors:  Amanda R Phillips; Elizabeth A Andraska; Katherine M Reitz; Lucine Gabriel; Karim M Salem; Natalie D Sridharan; Edith Tzeng; Nathan L Liang
Journal:  Ann Vasc Surg       Date:  2021-11-12       Impact factor: 1.466

Review 9.  Abdominal aortic aneurysms in women.

Authors:  Ruby C Lo; Marc L Schermerhorn
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2015-12-30       Impact factor: 4.268

10.  Factors Affecting Follow-Up Compliance in Patients After Endovascular Aneurysm Repair.

Authors:  Patrick T Jasinski; Nicos Labropoulos; Olympia G Christoforatos; Apostolos K Tassiopoulos
Journal:  Aorta (Stamford)       Date:  2017-10-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.