| Literature DB >> 25438155 |
Lang Jia1, Jinyun Chen2, Yan Wang2, Yingjiang Liu2, Yu Zhang2, Wenzhi Chen2.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess changes in osteophytic, chondral, and subchondral structures in a surgically-induced osteoarthritis (OA) rabbit model in order to correlate MRI findings with the macroscopic progress of OA and to define the timepoint for disease status in this OA model.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25438155 PMCID: PMC4249955 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0113707
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1Representative Magnetic Resonance Images (MRI) of Rabbit Knees from Weeks Two through Eight Post-Surgery.
Upper panels: Representative T2-FI3D-we-sag sequence MRI showing cartilage defects on the medial femoral condyles and tibial plateaus. Arrows indicate cartilage thickening (grade one) at week two post-surgery, cartilage edema or thickening with an intact surface (grades one to two) at week four post-surgery, and loss of cartilage (grades three to four) at week eight post-surgery. Lower panels: Representative sagittal spoiled gradient sequence MRI of femoral condyles, trochlea, and tibial plateaus showing the evolution of subchondral bone hypersignal from weeks two through eight post-surgery. A, anterior; P, posterior; circles indicate lesion areas (mm).
Cartilage Lesion Grades and Scores Measured by Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI).
| Femoral condyles and trochlea | Tibial plateaus | Medial compartment | Lateral compartment | ||
|
| Score | 2.00±1.00 | 1.50±0.71 | 2.50±0.71 | 1.50±0.71 |
| Grade | 0.10±0.30 | 0.15±0.43 | 0.10±0.30 | 0.05±0.22 | |
|
| Score | 24.33±2.08 | 25.50±2.12 | 26.00±1.41 | 23.00±1.41 |
| (20:20:20) | (20:20:20) | (20:20:20) | (20:20:20) | ||
| Grade | 1.22±0.42 | 1.27±0.45 | 1.30±0.46 | 1.15±0.36 | |
|
| Score | 38.00±4.36 | 39.23±2.83 | 39.00±1.41 | 33.50±0.71 |
| (20:20:20) | (20:20:20) | (20:20:20) | (20:20:20) | ||
| Grade | 1.90±0.71 | 1.94±0.56 | 1.97±0.46 | 1.90±0.55 | |
|
| Score | 64.33±3.06 | 67.50±2.12 | 65.00±2.83 | 62.50±3.54 |
| (20:20:20) | (20:20:20) | (20:20:20) | (20:20:20) | ||
| Grade | 3.12±0.74# | 3.35±0.75 | 3.25±0.78 | 3.00±0.82 |
Data (n = 20 knees) are expressed as means±SDs. Scores are expressed as the summation of grades, and the grades as an average of the grades obtained for each region. Incidences of the lesions in subregions are indicated in parentheses (number of rabbits with lesions on medial/lateral femoral condyles/trochlea, medial/lateral tibial plateaus, or femoral condyles/tibial plateaus in the compartments).
Femoral condyles and trochlea score: week eight compared to weeks four and two,
p = 0.000; week four compared to week two,
* p = 0.02. Femoral condyles and trochlea grade: week eight compared to weeks four and two, # p = 0.000; week four compared to week two,
p = 0.000.
Tibial plateaus score: week eight compared to week four,
p = 0.002; week four compared to week two,
p = 0.022; week eight compared to week two,
p = 0.001. Tibial plateaus grade: Week eight compared to weeks four and two,
p = 0.000;week four compared to week two,
p = 0.000.
Medial compartment score: week eight compared to weeks four and two,
p = 0.000; week four compared to week two,
p = 0.022. Medial compartment grade: week eight compared to weeks four and two,
p = 0.000; week four compared to week two,
Φ p = 0.022.
Lateral compartment score: week eight compared to weeks four and two,
p = 0.000; week four compared to week two,
p = 0.022. Lateral compartment grade: week eight compared to weeks four and two,
p = 0.000; week four compared to week two,
p = 0.022.
Cartilage Lesion Grades and Scores Measured by Macroscopic Examination.
| Femoral condyles nd trochlea | Tibial plateaus | Medial ompartment | Lateral ompartment | ||
|
| Score | 2.67±0.58 | 2.60±0.71 | 3.50±0.71 | 2.50±0.71 |
| Grade | 0.12±0.32 | 0.20±0.41 | 0.18±0.38 | 0.08±0.27 | |
|
| Score | 27.67±2.52 | 25.55±2.52 | 29.00±1.41 | 26.00±1.41 |
| (20:20:20) | (20:20:20) | (20:20:20) | (20:20:20) | ||
| Grade | 1.35±0.48 | 1.42±0.50 | 1.40±0.50 | 1.30±0.46 | |
|
| Score | 38.67±1.53 | 39.50±3.54 | 41.00±1.41 | 37.50±0.71 |
| (20:20:20) | (20:20:20) | (20:20:20) | (20:20:20) | ||
| Grade | 1.93±0.66 | 1.98±0.53 | 2.00±0.66 | 1.88±0.52 | |
|
| Score | 68.00±1.73 | 69.00±1.41 | 69.50±0.71 | 67.50±0.71 |
| (20:20:20) | (20:20:20) | (20:20:20) | (20:20:20) | ||
| Grade | 3.47±0.57 | 3.45±0.5 | 3.55±0.55 | 3.38±0.49 |
Data (n = 20 knees) are expressed as means±SDs. Scores are expressed as the summation of grades, and the grades as an average of the grades obtained for each region. Incidences of the lesions in subregions are indicated in parentheses (number of rabbits with lesions on medial/lateral femoral condyles/trochlea, medial/lateral tibial plateaus, or femoral condyles/tibial plateaus in the compartments).
Femoral condyles and trochlea score: week eight compared to weeks four and two,
p = 0.000; week four compared to week two,
* p = 0.000. Femoral condyles and trochlea grade: week eight compared to weeks four and two,
p = 0.000; week four compared to week two,
p = 0.000.
Tibial plateaus score: week eight compared to week four,
p = 0.001; week four compared to week two,
p = 0.022; week eight compared to week two,
p = 0.001. Tibial plateaus grade: week eight compared to weeks four and two,
p = 0.000; week four compared to week two,
p = 0.000.
Medial compartment score: week eight compared to weeks four and two,
p = 0.000; week four compared to week two,
p = 0.022. Medial compartment grade: week eight compared to weeks four and two,
p = 0.000; week four compared to week two,
Φ p = 0.000.
Lateral compartment score: week eight compared to weeks four and two,
p = 0.000; week four compared to week two,
p = 0.022. Lateral compartment grade: week eight compared to weeks four and two,
p = 0.000; week four compared to week two,
p = 0.000.
Osteophyte Size Measured by Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) & Macroscopic Examination.
| Media tibial lateau (mm) | Lateral tibial lateau (mm) | Total (mm) | ||
|
| Osteophyte size by MRI | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Osteophyte size by macroscopic examination | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
|
| Osteophyte size by MRI | 1.06±0.34 | 0.87±0.33 | 0.97±0.35 |
| Osteophyte size by macroscopic examination | 1.43±0.32 | 1.19±0.32 | 1.31±0.34 | |
|
| Osteophyte size by MRI | 1.87±0.30 | 1.24±0.38 | 1.55±0.47 |
| Osteophyte size by macroscopic examination | 2.34±0.52 | 1.67±0.37 | 2.00±0.56 | |
|
| Osteophyte size by MRI | 3.21±0.51§ | 2.21±0.47 | 2.71±0.70 |
| Osteophyte size by macroscopic examination | 3.73±0.43 | 2.82±0.45 | 3.27±0.63 |
Data (n = 20 knees) are expressed as means±SDs.
Osteophyte size measured by MRI in media tibial plateaus, week eight compared to weeks four and two, §p = 0.000; week four compared to week two,
*p = 0.000. Osteophyte size measured by macroscopic examination in medial tibial plateaus, week eight compared to weeks four and two,
p = 0.000; week four compared to week two,
p = 0.000.
Osteophyte size measured by MRI in lateral tibial plateaus, week eight compared to weeks four and two,
p = 0.000; week four compared to week two,
p = 0.000. Osteophyte size measured by macroscopic examination in lateral tibial plateaus, week eight compared to weeks four and two,
p = 0.000; week four compared to week two,
p = 0.000.
Osteophyte size measured by MRI in total tibial plateaus, week eight compared to weeks four and two,
p = 0.000; week four compared to week two,
p = 0.000. Osteophyte size measured by macroscopic examination in total tibial plateaus, week eight compared to weeks four and two,
p = 0.000; week four compared to week two,
p = 0.000.
Subchondral Bone Lesion Scores and Grades Measured by Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI).
| Femoral condyles nd trochlea | Tibial plateaus | Medial ompartment | Lateral ompartment | ||
|
| Score | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Grade | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
|
| Score | 15.67±1.53 | 17.00±1.41 | 17.50±0.71 | 15.00±1.41 |
| (17:14:16) | (18:16) | (17:18) | (14:16) | ||
| Grade | 0.78±0.42 | 0.85±0.36 | 0.90±0.33 | 0.88±0.30 | |
|
| Score | 25.33±2.08 | 31.50±2.12 | 30.00±4.24 | 26.5±4.95 |
| (20:20:20) | (20:20) | (20:20) | (20:20) | ||
| Grade | 1.27±0.45 | 1.58±0.64 | 1.50±0.64 | 1.33±0.47 | |
|
| Score | 40.33±2.52 | 43.00±4.24 | 44.50±2.12 | 39.00±1.41 |
| (20:20:20) | (20: 20) | (20: 20) | (20: 20) | ||
| Grade | 2.01±0.65 | 2.15±0.74 | 2.23±0.53 | 1.95±0.60 |
Data (n = 20 knees) are expressed as means±SDs. Scores are expressed as the summation of grades, and the grades as an average of the grades obtained for each region. Incidences of the lesions in subregions are indicated in parentheses (number of rabbits with lesions on medial/lateral femoral condyles/trochlea, medial/lateral tibial plateaus, or femoral condyles/tibial plateaus in the compartments).
Femoral condyles and trochlea score: week eight compared to weeks four and two,
p = 0.000; week four compared to week two,
* p = 0.001. Femoral condyles and trochlea grade: week eight compared to weeks four and two,
p = 0.000; week four compared to week two,
p = 0.000.
Tibial plateaus score: week eight compared to week four,
p = 0.028; week four compared to week two,
p = 0.015; week eight compared to week two,
p = 0.003. Tibial plateaus grade: week eight compared to weeks four and two,
p = 0.000; week four compared to week two,
p = 0.000.
Medial compartment score: week eight compared to weeks four and two,
p = 0.000; week four compared to week two,
p = 0.018. Medial compartment grade: week eight compared to weeks four and two,
p = 0.000; week four compared to week two,
Φ p = 0.002.
Lateral compartment score: week eight compared to weeks four and two,
p = 0.000; week four compared to week two,
p = 0.002. Lateral compartment grade: week eight compared to weeks four and two,
p = 0.000; week four compared to week two,
p = 0.002.
Figure 2Macroscopic Appearance of Osteoarthritic Cartilage from Weeks Two through Eight Post-Surgery.
L, lateral; M, medial. Circles indicate lesion areas (mm).
Figure 3Correlations between Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Macroscopic Lesion Grading at Different Time Points (n = 20 knees).