BACKGROUND: Osteoarthritis (OA) is increasingly prevalent in the years after menopause. Epidemiological data suggest that the use of oestrogen replacement therapy (ERT) may protect against knee OA. AIM: To test the hypothesis that long term ERT (longer than five years) is associated with increased knee cartilage in postmenopausal women. METHODS: The study involved 81 women (42 current users (> or = five years) of ERT and 39 who had never used it). Articular cartilage volumes were determined by processing images acquired in the sagittal plane using a T1 weighted fat suppressed magnetic resonance sequence on an independent work station. RESULTS: After bone size had been accounted for, ERT users had higher tibial cartilage volume than non-users. Total tibial cartilage volume was 7.7% (0.23 ml) greater in the group of ERT users (2.98 (0.47) ml; mean (SD)) than in the untreated group (2.75 (0.50) ml). The difference, after adjustment for the significant explanatory factors (years since menopause, body mass index, age at menopause, and smoking), between the ERT users and non-users increased from 0.23 ml to 0.30 ml (95% confidence interval 0.08 to 0.52, p=0.008). These differences persisted after exclusion of women with OA. CONCLUSIONS: After adjustment for multiple confounders, women using long term ERT have more knee cartilage than controls. This may indicate that ERT prevents loss of knee articular cartilage.
BACKGROUND:Osteoarthritis (OA) is increasingly prevalent in the years after menopause. Epidemiological data suggest that the use of oestrogen replacement therapy (ERT) may protect against knee OA. AIM: To test the hypothesis that long term ERT (longer than five years) is associated with increased knee cartilage in postmenopausal women. METHODS: The study involved 81 women (42 current users (> or = five years) of ERT and 39 who had never used it). Articular cartilage volumes were determined by processing images acquired in the sagittal plane using a T1 weighted fat suppressed magnetic resonance sequence on an independent work station. RESULTS: After bone size had been accounted for, ERT users had higher tibial cartilage volume than non-users. Total tibial cartilage volume was 7.7% (0.23 ml) greater in the group of ERT users (2.98 (0.47) ml; mean (SD)) than in the untreated group (2.75 (0.50) ml). The difference, after adjustment for the significant explanatory factors (years since menopause, body mass index, age at menopause, and smoking), between the ERT users and non-users increased from 0.23 ml to 0.30 ml (95% confidence interval 0.08 to 0.52, p=0.008). These differences persisted after exclusion of women with OA. CONCLUSIONS: After adjustment for multiple confounders, women using long term ERT have more knee cartilage than controls. This may indicate that ERT prevents loss of knee articular cartilage.
Authors: J C Waterton; S Solloway; J E Foster; M C Keen; S Gandy; B J Middleton; R A Maciewicz; I Watt; P A Dieppe; C J Taylor Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2000-01 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Yuanyuan Wang; Alasdair R Dempsey; David G Lloyd; Peter M Mills; Tim Wrigley; Kim L Bennell; Ben Metcalf; Fahad Hanna; Flavia M Cicuttini Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2011-09-24 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: Yun Jong Lee; Eun Bong Lee; Young Ee Kwon; Jung Jin Lee; Woo Shin Cho; Hyun A Kim; Yeong Wook Song Journal: Rheumatol Int Date: 2003-04-09 Impact factor: 2.631
Authors: N Glass; N A Segal; K A Sluka; J C Torner; M C Nevitt; D T Felson; L A Bradley; T Neogi; C E Lewis; L A Frey-Law Journal: Osteoarthritis Cartilage Date: 2014-07-04 Impact factor: 6.576
Authors: Patricia A Berry; Andrew J Teichtahl; Ana Galevska-Dimitrovska; Fahad S Hanna; Anita E Wluka; Yuanyuan Wang; Donna M Urquhart; Dallas R English; Graham G Giles; Flavia M Cicuttini Journal: Arthritis Res Ther Date: 2008-12-15 Impact factor: 5.156