Literature DB >> 25437727

Chromosome abnormalities detected by current prenatal screening and noninvasive prenatal testing.

Mary E Norton1, Laura L Jelliffe-Pawlowski, Robert J Currier.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To estimate how many additional chromosomal abnormalities can be detected by diagnostic testing compared with noninvasive prenatal testing in a high-risk prenatal population.
METHODS: All karyotype results of invasive prenatal testing in singleton pregnancies performed in response to a positive prenatal screen through the California Prenatal Screening Program from April 2009 through December 2012 were examined. Abnormal karyotypes were categorized as to whether the abnormality is detectable by current noninvasive prenatal testing methods.
RESULTS: Of 1,324,607 women who had traditional screening during the study period, 68,990 (5.2%) were screen-positive. Of screen-positive women, 26,059 (37.8%) underwent invasive diagnostic testing and 2,993 had an abnormal result (11.5%). Of these, 2,488 (83.1%) were predicted to be detectable with current noninvasive prenatal testing methods, and 506 (16.9%) were considered not currently detectable. Trisomy 21 accounted for 53.2% of the abnormal results (n=1,592). Common aneuploidies, detectable by noninvasive prenatal testing, comprised a higher percentage of abnormal results in older women (P<.01).
CONCLUSION: For pregnant women with a positive aneuploidy screen who pursued diagnostic testing, 16.9% of chromosome abnormalities are not currently detectable by noninvasive prenatal testing. Undetectable aneuploidies range from relatively mild to those associated with significant disability. This is important information to be considered by patients, health care providers, and screening programs in evaluating the use of traditional screening and invasive prenatal diagnosis compared with noninvasive prenatal testing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25437727     DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000452

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  12 in total

1.  PURLs: Aneuploidy screening: Newer noninvasive test gains traction.

Authors:  Sarah Nickolich; Narges Farahi; Kohar Jones; Anne Mounsey
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 0.493

Review 2.  Genomics-based non-invasive prenatal testing for detection of fetal chromosomal aneuploidy in pregnant women.

Authors:  Mylène Badeau; Carmen Lindsay; Jonatan Blais; Leon Nshimyumukiza; Yemisi Takwoingi; Sylvie Langlois; France Légaré; Yves Giguère; Alexis F Turgeon; William Witteman; François Rousseau
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-11-10

Review 3.  Pre- and post-test genetic counseling for chromosomal and Mendelian disorders.

Authors:  Jill Fonda Allen; Katie Stoll; Barbara A Bernhardt
Journal:  Semin Perinatol       Date:  2015-12-21       Impact factor: 3.300

4.  The Integration of Noninvasive Prenatal Screening into the Existing Prenatal Paradigm: a Survey of Current Genetic Counseling Practice.

Authors:  Emily Suskin; Laura Hercher; Kathleen Erskine Aaron; Komal Bajaj
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-02-15       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 5.  Have we done our last amniocentesis? Updates on cell-free DNA for Down syndrome screening.

Authors:  Kathryn J Gray; Louise E Wilkins-Haug
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2018-03-17

Review 6.  Cell-Free DNA Screening: Complexities and Challenges of Clinical Implementation.

Authors:  Matthew R Grace; Emily Hardisty; Sarah K Dotters-Katz; Neeta L Vora; Jeffrey A Kuller
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Surv       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 2.347

7.  The utility of nuchal translucency ultrasound in identifying rare chromosomal abnormalities not detectable by cell-free DNA screening.

Authors:  Victoria K Berger; Mary E Norton; Teresa N Sparks; Monica Flessel; Rebecca J Baer; Robert J Currier
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 3.050

Review 8.  Recent advances in prenatal genetic screening and testing.

Authors:  Ignatia B Van den Veyver
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2016-10-28

9.  The Use of Ultrasound as a Potential Adjunct to Cell-Free Fetal DNA Screening for Aneuploidy at Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, USA.

Authors:  Jessica Scholl; Stephen Chasen
Journal:  Surg J (N Y)       Date:  2018-02-09

10.  Trial by Dutch laboratories for evaluation of non-invasive prenatal testing. Part I-clinical impact.

Authors:  Dick Oepkes; G C Lieve Page-Christiaens; Caroline J Bax; Mireille N Bekker; Catia M Bilardo; Elles M J Boon; G Heleen Schuring-Blom; Audrey B C Coumans; Brigitte H Faas; Robert-Jan H Galjaard; Attie T Go; Lidewij Henneman; Merryn V E Macville; Eva Pajkrt; Ron F Suijkerbuijk; Karin Huijsdens-van Amsterdam; Diane Van Opstal; E J Joanne Verweij; Marjan M Weiss; Erik A Sistermans
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2016-11-15       Impact factor: 3.050

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.